Domain: tiger-web1.srvr.media3.us What OC fits our style of recruting, and runs Pro Style??? | Page 2 | Coach Changes
Started By
Message

re: What OC fits our style of recruting, and runs Pro Style???

Posted on 12/29/10 at 10:58 am to
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
471589 posts
Posted on 12/29/10 at 10:58 am to
quote:

why do people want pro style so bad?

a pro-style offense with the right personnel is still the hardest offense to stop (and our personnel is a pro-style group)

and as an offense it has stood the test of time
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
471589 posts
Posted on 12/29/10 at 11:01 am to
quote:

Both run the spread?

yeah OU and UT ran the spread in 08-09 (UT also had some spread option)
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
471589 posts
Posted on 12/29/10 at 11:03 am to
quote:

adapt or get left behind.

LSU currently runs a spread/spread-option offense...or at least crowton attempts to.

quote:

you know what i like more than tradition? winning football games

well when LSU gets the best player in CFB to play QB, and that QB fits the spread option, i'll be mad if we don't run that offense

go through those years...

2005: vince young
2008: tebow
2010: newton

there is a much higher correlation with having an amazing QB WITH that offense than the offense iteslf
Posted by MachineTiger
Florida
Member since Oct 2010
71 posts
Posted on 12/29/10 at 11:04 am to
Spread may work for some programs sure, but for LSU I think we build off a strong run game along with big plays from physical, big WR's. Metts a pocket passer that could manage the Pro-Style perfectly. With the stud RB's coming up we need to run the ball. These discussions is why fans love college football. Exciting, entertaining, and unpredictable at times.
Posted by Angry LLAMA
the energy capital of the world
Member since Mar 2009
2731 posts
Posted on 12/29/10 at 11:05 am to
quote:

a pro-style offense with the right personnel is still the hardest offense to stop
well, we can cross out fingers that one day leinert, bush, and lendale white fall in out lap so we can go on an unprecedented run, or we can get more with less- which is what the spread does. i dont want the planets to have to align before our offense is any good again.....
This post was edited on 12/29/10 at 11:06 am
Posted by OBUDan
Chicago
Member since Aug 2006
40723 posts
Posted on 12/29/10 at 11:07 am to
quote:

yeah OU and UT ran the spread in 08-09 (UT also had some spread option)



I know, that's why I was wondering why he listed them as "bowl losers" and lumped them in with Ohio State.
Posted by Angry LLAMA
the energy capital of the world
Member since Mar 2009
2731 posts
Posted on 12/29/10 at 11:09 am to
quote:

but for LSU I think we build off a strong run game along with big plays from physical, big WR'
you can do all this from the spread

i just dont understand why we dont want to use coaching to get an advantage on offense. use formations, motion, and some running QB to get an advantage. its like everyone just wants to put pro-style QBs into the NFL over winning football games
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
471589 posts
Posted on 12/29/10 at 11:10 am to
quote:

we can cross out fingers that one day leinert, bush, and lendale white fall in out lap

you don't need these. bama won it all with mceloy, ingram, and jones. LSU has comparable players to these players

quote:

or we can get more with less- which is what the spread does

LSU runs teh spread and spread option already, brotha

seems like with LSU, we get less from more

and no spread team has really won a title, and none have arguably done so since OU in 2000 (and i'd love to hear an argument as to how their offense won them that title)

a few spread option teams have won titles, but all had super duper elite QBs (young, tebow, newton this year possibly) other than UF 2006 (who had the #1 defense in the country).

LSU and more of a pro-style attack won it all in 2003 and 2007 with 2 so-so QBs at the helm. Bama did it in 2008 as well. want to get more from less? seems like pro-style is the way to do so and the spread option relies on super rare/elite talent
Posted by Angry LLAMA
the energy capital of the world
Member since Mar 2009
2731 posts
Posted on 12/29/10 at 11:11 am to
quote:

quote:

yeah OU and UT ran the spread in 08-09 (UT also had some spread option)
I know, that's why I was wondering why he listed them as "bowl losers" and lumped them in with Ohio State.
b/c they lost, but still run the spread. making my point- the best 2 teams every year seem to run the spread.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
471589 posts
Posted on 12/29/10 at 11:11 am to
quote:

i just dont understand why we dont want to use coaching to get an advantage on offense. use formations, motion, and some running QB to get an advantage

that's what LSU has been trying to do in 2009 and 2010. where have you been?

quote:

its like everyone just wants to put pro-style QBs into the NFL over winning football games

yeah because we use JJ like such a pro style QB
Posted by OBUDan
Chicago
Member since Aug 2006
40723 posts
Posted on 12/29/10 at 11:15 am to
My personal stance is that getting guys to the league is one of the top recruiting pitches you can make.

In the current NFL, most teams run Pro-Style, though some Spread influences are being infused.

That's why I personally like the Pro-Style offense... but I'd be happy with any type of system that actually functions.
Posted by ATLTiger
#TreyBiletnikoffs
Member since Sep 2003
46337 posts
Posted on 12/29/10 at 11:15 am to
quote:

LSU currently runs a spread/spread-option offense


I think it's more pro style with some spread and option stuff thrown in.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
471589 posts
Posted on 12/29/10 at 11:16 am to
quote:

I think it's more pro style with some spread and option stuff thrown in.

i'll rephrase

we run an offense that incorporates a ton of the beloved spread and spread option, and it's still shite
Posted by Angry LLAMA
the energy capital of the world
Member since Mar 2009
2731 posts
Posted on 12/29/10 at 11:19 am to
quote:

LSU runs teh spread and spread option already, brotha

seems like with LSU, we get less from more
b/c crowton is fricking terrible. dont let the bottom quarter of the coaching profession ruin the good name of the people who know what they are doing.
Posted by Angry LLAMA
the energy capital of the world
Member since Mar 2009
2731 posts
Posted on 12/29/10 at 11:20 am to
quote:

that's what LSU has been trying to do in 2009 and 2010. where have you been?
crowton mutha fricka. hes terrible
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
471589 posts
Posted on 12/29/10 at 11:24 am to
quote:

b/c crowton is fricking terrible

and we don't have the personnel

not everybody can pluck a 5 star JUCO who happens to be the best player in the country

JJ, Lee, and Mett are all pocket passers. JJ has speed, and has improve his running a lot, but he's not a running QB

the only other option would be shep, and i think we all know that's likely a disaster (size, throwing inability)
Posted by Linkovich
crater lake
Member since Feb 2007
9550 posts
Posted on 12/29/10 at 11:24 am to
quote:

quote:
LSU currently runs a spread/spread-option offense


I think it's more pro style with some spread and option stuff thrown in.


I think it's more of a big pile of Joker horseshite. I honestly think Gary is up their pulling a fricking slot machine lever to figure it out.

or when the chicken is dancing
Posted by Angry LLAMA
the energy capital of the world
Member since Mar 2009
2731 posts
Posted on 12/29/10 at 11:28 am to
quote:

and we don't have the personnel

not everybody can pluck a 5 star JUCO who happens to be the best player in the country

JJ, Lee, and Mett are all pocket passers. JJ has speed, and has improve his running a lot, but he's not a running QB

the only other option would be shep, and i think we all know that's likely a disaster (size, throwing inability)
its amazing what some coaching does. check 2009 dickface chris todd. he sucked before malzahn got there, turned it into the the #14 offense in the land. coaching. and QB mentoring. crowton knows neither
Posted by ATLTiger
#TreyBiletnikoffs
Member since Sep 2003
46337 posts
Posted on 12/29/10 at 11:31 am to
quote:

it's still shite


which is the bottom line. to be honest, I don't have a problem with our playbook, it's the playcalling/ personnel use. we shouldn't have been this bad. but I digress...

give me Steve Logan, Borges, Whipple, or Friedgen.
Posted by ATLTiger
#TreyBiletnikoffs
Member since Sep 2003
46337 posts
Posted on 12/29/10 at 11:37 am to
quote:

JJ, Lee, and Mett are all pocket passers. JJ has speed, and has improve his running a lot, but he's not a running QB



I'm not sure what the hell JJ is at this point. to be a pocket passer, you actually have to be able to pass. let's say shitty pocket passer.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram