- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Rank the conferences in terms of expansion winners/losers
Posted on 10/6/11 at 10:32 am
Posted on 10/6/11 at 10:32 am
1. Big10: +Nebraska, +CCG
2. SEC: +Texas A&M
3. ACC: +Syracuse, +Pitt
4. Pac12: +Colorado, +Utah, +CCG
5. Big 12: -Nebraska, -Colorado, -TexasA&M, +TCU, -CCG ...
6. Big East: -Syracuse, -Pitt, -TCU
I think Big10/SEC have pretty much done the same thus far....ACC/Pac12 have pretty much done the same...Big East is by far the biggest loser IMO. Big12 has certainly taken a hit and is a weaker conference now, but I don't think they have taken as big a hit as the BigEast.
2. SEC: +Texas A&M
3. ACC: +Syracuse, +Pitt
4. Pac12: +Colorado, +Utah, +CCG
5. Big 12: -Nebraska, -Colorado, -TexasA&M, +TCU, -CCG ...
6. Big East: -Syracuse, -Pitt, -TCU
I think Big10/SEC have pretty much done the same thus far....ACC/Pac12 have pretty much done the same...Big East is by far the biggest loser IMO. Big12 has certainly taken a hit and is a weaker conference now, but I don't think they have taken as big a hit as the BigEast.
This post was edited on 10/6/11 at 10:37 am
Posted on 10/6/11 at 10:35 am to JPLSU1981
I'd say Big 10 b/c they finally got a conf. championship game and the money, plus Nebraska has a much more storied history and stronger fanbase than A&M
SEC is second with adding TX market
Big 12 North was a joke and now I don't know what you call it
SEC is second with adding TX market
Big 12 North was a joke and now I don't know what you call it
Posted on 10/6/11 at 10:57 am to Hubbhogg
quote:
plus Nebraska has a much more storied history and stronger fanbase than A&M
Posted on 10/6/11 at 10:59 am to Greg09Ag
1) Pac 12, did you see their TV deal...
2) SEC, too early to tell
3) Big 10 (can start a championship game)
4) ACC (Survival)
5) Big 12 (will survive)
6) Big lEAST (they are in real trouble, soon to be a Bball conference.
2) SEC, too early to tell
3) Big 10 (can start a championship game)
4) ACC (Survival)
5) Big 12 (will survive)
6) Big lEAST (they are in real trouble, soon to be a Bball conference.
Posted on 10/6/11 at 11:00 am to Greg09Ag
Real Serious
A bunch of guys dressed alike droning on all game doesn't equate to shite
A bunch of guys dressed alike droning on all game doesn't equate to shite
Posted on 10/6/11 at 11:05 am to Hubbhogg
Neb has history and is history.
Dr. Tom out!
Dr. Tom out!
Posted on 10/6/11 at 11:05 am to JPLSU1981
I would put the Pac 12 ahead of the ACC and maybe the SEC too. Getting a conference championship game is huge. Their TV deal is massive.
Posted on 10/6/11 at 11:14 am to Hubbhogg
quote:
A bunch of guys dressed alike droning on all game doesn't equate to shite
So...you just described every program ever. Got ya.
Posted on 10/6/11 at 11:26 am to Mer Rouge
quote:
Neb has history and is history.
Storied History- A team that was formerly popular or influential, whose popularity or effectiveness has peaked and is now in decline. ~a person or thing that is no longer effective, successful, popular, etc. A discription by fans whose teams have now become irelevent. Ohio state has a storied history!
Posted on 10/6/11 at 11:39 am to Hubbhogg
quote:
plus Nebraska has a much more storied history and stronger fanbase than A&M
I agree with that
I would guess financially A&M is even or better tho (for what markets they bring)
Posted on 10/6/11 at 1:02 pm to JPLSU1981
1. Big Ten: Added a prestigious program and got a CG
2. Pac 12: Added two mediocre programs but got a CG
3. SEC: Added a quality program and huge TV market, but may find that 14 teams (assuming we go there) is unmanageable for scheduling
4. ACC: Insured its survival, strengthened itself in basketball and essentially murdered its only competition for east coast supremacy, but added nothing in football and may find 14 teams unamanageable as well
5. Big XII: Took a severe hit, and will probably take another one any time now, but will add some mediocre programs and survive...for now
6. Big East: Dead as a football conference, weakened as a basketball conference, will lose more teams soon
...
11. WAC: Lost its three best programs, having to add two new FBS schools for next year (Texas St. and Texas-San Antonio), will have to merge with Sun Belt even to have enough teams to have a conference, regardless of quality
2. Pac 12: Added two mediocre programs but got a CG
3. SEC: Added a quality program and huge TV market, but may find that 14 teams (assuming we go there) is unmanageable for scheduling
4. ACC: Insured its survival, strengthened itself in basketball and essentially murdered its only competition for east coast supremacy, but added nothing in football and may find 14 teams unamanageable as well
5. Big XII: Took a severe hit, and will probably take another one any time now, but will add some mediocre programs and survive...for now
6. Big East: Dead as a football conference, weakened as a basketball conference, will lose more teams soon
...
11. WAC: Lost its three best programs, having to add two new FBS schools for next year (Texas St. and Texas-San Antonio), will have to merge with Sun Belt even to have enough teams to have a conference, regardless of quality
This post was edited on 10/6/11 at 1:10 pm
Posted on 10/6/11 at 1:35 pm to Nuts4LSU
1) B1G
they added nebraska and a CCG
2) ACC
ensured survival, helped basketball, and (so far) didnt lose anyone, i have them so high not so much because they gained so much, but because they could've really lost a lot but didnt
3) Pac-12
sweet tv deal, added some mediocre teams to get a CCG
4)SEC
they were doing so great before, i think adding aTm and possibly mizzou just dilutes the product, hard to improve upon perfection
5) big 12
they didnt die, quite yet
6) big east
they're dead
they added nebraska and a CCG
2) ACC
ensured survival, helped basketball, and (so far) didnt lose anyone, i have them so high not so much because they gained so much, but because they could've really lost a lot but didnt
3) Pac-12
sweet tv deal, added some mediocre teams to get a CCG
4)SEC
they were doing so great before, i think adding aTm and possibly mizzou just dilutes the product, hard to improve upon perfection
5) big 12
they didnt die, quite yet
6) big east
they're dead
Popular
Back to top
3








