- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Should I drop Taysom Hill?
Posted on 11/2/22 at 10:19 am
Posted on 11/2/22 at 10:19 am
1pt PPR 6pt TD. Have Kyle Pitts (i know) at TE. Debating dropping Taysom and going for stash of Kyren Williams at RB. I'm a little weak at RB with Cook, Pollard, Jamaal Williams, Khalil Herbert, and Gus Edwards.
We play 1 qb, 3 wr, 2 rb, 1 te, 1 flex
Thoughts?
We play 1 qb, 3 wr, 2 rb, 1 te, 1 flex
Thoughts?
3
Posted on 11/2/22 at 10:25 am to Shotgun Willie
I’m out on Taysom for fantasy purposes. There’s zero predictability there.
Andy Dalton is the guy for 2022. Kamara looks like he’s locked in if last week was any evidence. Ingrams injury does help.
He will probably get some TDs and make my most look bad, but I’m riding or dying with Pitts.
With all of this bullshite I just said, Rams backfield may just be a complete dud even with Kyren. It would be a flyer on him getting opportunity AND an OL improvement.
Andy Dalton is the guy for 2022. Kamara looks like he’s locked in if last week was any evidence. Ingrams injury does help.
He will probably get some TDs and make my most look bad, but I’m riding or dying with Pitts.
With all of this bullshite I just said, Rams backfield may just be a complete dud even with Kyren. It would be a flyer on him getting opportunity AND an OL improvement.
Posted on 11/2/22 at 11:10 am to LSUcam7
quote:
There’s zero predictability there.
Yep. He could score 40 or 4 and you will never really know which week either is going to happen.
Posted on 11/2/22 at 11:13 am to TigerLunatik
Now apply that same logic to Kyle Pitts.
You shouldn't have to drop either player. Trade whoever will extract you the most value.
You shouldn't have to drop either player. Trade whoever will extract you the most value.
Posted on 11/2/22 at 11:20 am to papz
It’s not apples to apples to compare Taysom to really any player. But I’ll try..
Taysom snap share averages around 25% yet gets extremely high value RZ touches and is consistent with those touches.
Pitts is logging 75-80% snap share but is on a team that, so far, has passed the ball like a Pop Warner league. 9 targets last week. If that continues, Pitts has a better floor moving forward.
ETA: as I mentioned the new update in Taysom’s favor is the Ingram injury. He might get better snap counts and build a floor off rushing.
If I owned both, I’d hate making that decision week to week.
Taysom snap share averages around 25% yet gets extremely high value RZ touches and is consistent with those touches.
Pitts is logging 75-80% snap share but is on a team that, so far, has passed the ball like a Pop Warner league. 9 targets last week. If that continues, Pitts has a better floor moving forward.
ETA: as I mentioned the new update in Taysom’s favor is the Ingram injury. He might get better snap counts and build a floor off rushing.
If I owned both, I’d hate making that decision week to week.
This post was edited on 11/2/22 at 11:24 am
Posted on 11/2/22 at 12:10 pm to TigerLunatik
quote:
He could score 40 or 4 and you will never really know which week either is going to happen.
True, but most TEs have a range more like 4-14 with no more predictability. I'd rather the guy that can get 40.
Posted on 11/2/22 at 12:31 pm to BhamTigah
As a Pitts owner, I fully get it 
Posted on 11/2/22 at 12:31 pm to BhamTigah
quote:
True, but most TEs have a range more like 4-14 with no more predictability. I'd rather the guy that can get 40.
Exactly. You shouldn’t expect much out of TE unless you have a top 2-3
guy. Might as well go big.
Dalton is the best thing for Hill. They are running the offense through Taysom at times. He actually put up like 9 points for me in PPR league where he doesn’t even catch passes. He nearly broke one for a TD.
Week or so before he had the receiving TD. I still expect TDs if not decent rushing totals from Taysom until more receivers come back. He is almost a cheat code at times.
Posted on 11/2/22 at 12:34 pm to beauchristopher
With all that said you paid the price for Pitts, so maybe stick with him after the Falcons finally decided to pass. I hate to roster two TEs, but I probably would here. At least until I saw consistency from Pitts.
If you don’t want to go rogue at TE then go Pitts only.
If you don’t want to go rogue at TE then go Pitts only.
Posted on 11/2/22 at 1:20 pm to BhamTigah
quote:
True, but most TEs have a range more like 4-14 with no more predictability. I'd rather the guy that can get 40.
Waited too long to draft a TE and got Kmet. I'll gladly ride it out with Taysom the rest of the season.
Posted on 11/2/22 at 5:34 pm to Shotgun Willie
Depends on your roster construction. But I'll take his 4 boom weeks knowing he won't do shite the other weeks. Which is most of the other TEs, without the boom potential
Posted on 11/3/22 at 5:07 am to beauchristopher
quote:
Dalton is the best thing for Hill. They are running the offense through Taysom at times. He actually put up like 9 points for me in PPR league where he doesn’t even catch passes. He nearly broke one for a TD.
Week or so before he had the receiving TD. I still expect TDs if not decent rushing totals from Taysom until more receivers come back. He is almost a cheat code at times.
All of this. The offense moves well down the field with Dalton but he can't seem to have any success in the red zone. Expect a LOT of red zone touches(whether rushing, receiving, or direct snaps) from Taysom.
Posted on 11/3/22 at 3:05 pm to pankReb
A concern of mine moving forward was once Michael Thomas returned then the red zone opportunities could significantly go away. Well that is no longer a concern since MT went on IR.
Posted on 11/4/22 at 2:59 am to beauchristopher
Always operate under the assumption that the Saints will be without MT.....even when he's listed as starting.
Posted on 11/4/22 at 8:28 am to pankReb
The news yesterday certainly helps!
Posted on 11/4/22 at 10:01 am to Shotgun Willie
I have him on a few rosters.
He’s good for 5-10 at a min with a potential for 16+. A decent bye week filler.
He’s good for 5-10 at a min with a potential for 16+. A decent bye week filler.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News