- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Condemned USA Files Supreme Court Petition to Stop New York’s Lawfare Against Trump
Posted on 6/8/24 at 10:53 am
Posted on 6/8/24 at 10:53 am
LINK
quote:
J6er Treniss Evans, through his legal advocacy group Condemned USA, filed a Supreme Court petition on Friday aimed squarely at halting the controversial New York case against former President Donald Trump.
Evans’ petition contends that allowing New York to proceed would create inconsistent interpretations of federal law across states, undermining national legal uniformity and fairness. The petition seeks an immediate stay of the trial proceedings in New York, requesting that the Supreme Court intervene to prevent further potential injustice.
Evans also requests a comprehensive review of the trial record, arguing that Trump may be entitled to a writ of habeas corpus — a fundamental safeguard against unlawful and indefinite imprisonment.
The petition invokes the Supreme Court’s ruling in Norma Jean Anderson v. Trump, which held that state courts lack subject matter jurisdiction to enforce a non-uniform version of federal law. According to Evans, the New York trial misinterprets and inconsistently applies federal campaign finance law, violating the principle of judicial estoppel established in Anderson v. Trump.
Evans alleges violations of the Fourteenth Amendment’s equal protection and due process clauses, suggesting potential bias and selective prosecution by the New York District Attorney.
3
Posted on 6/8/24 at 11:16 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
An actual example of no standing.
Posted on 6/8/24 at 11:39 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
All of the arguments presented seemed reasonable to me - unschooled in the art of legalize.
And it totally aligns with any application of actual LOGIC.
And - which is more - our constitution was written for the protection of the common man - not the interests of entrenched political organization.
And it totally aligns with any application of actual LOGIC.
And - which is more - our constitution was written for the protection of the common man - not the interests of entrenched political organization.
Posted on 6/8/24 at 1:16 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
Why can't a State AG take this up. Argue these points as it affects the ability of the rest of the country to hear from the candidate of their choice, etc, etc
Posted on 6/8/24 at 1:20 pm to Indefatigable
It’s almost like they went after Trump and made US history by using never before used law.
quote:
"In fact, no state prosecutor — in New York, or Wyoming, or anywhere — has ever charged federal election laws as a direct or predicate state crime, against anyone, for anything. None. Ever," Honig wrote.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News