Domain: tiger-web1.srvr.media3.us Big win today for 2A supporters under Trump, Bondi and Dillon ... | Political Talk
Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

Big win today for 2A supporters under Trump, Bondi and Dillon ...

Posted on 1/15/26 at 9:41 pm
Posted by scrooster
Resident Ethicist
Member since Jul 2012
42433 posts
Posted on 1/15/26 at 9:41 pm
Huge news!


Mark Smith, for those that don't know, is the #1 2A guy out there, and a great all-around Constitutional attorney, (you see him on Fox News often), and he's a Gamecock and massive SEC fan.
Posted by DownshiftAndFloorIt
Here
Member since Jan 2011
71286 posts
Posted on 1/15/26 at 9:43 pm to
Can a brother get a cliff note
Posted by OU Guy
Member since Feb 2022
25473 posts
Posted on 1/15/26 at 9:43 pm to
Whats the news?
Posted by bamadontcare
Member since Jun 2013
3687 posts
Posted on 1/15/26 at 9:46 pm to
Bondi says Fed gun law violates 2nd
Amendment
Posted by GoGators1995
Member since Jan 2023
6813 posts
Posted on 1/15/26 at 9:47 pm to
The law banning using the USPS to ship handguns is unconstitutional.
Posted by SuperSaint
Sorting Out OT BS Since '2007'
Member since Sep 2007
148713 posts
Posted on 1/15/26 at 9:51 pm to
quote:

you see him on Fox News ofte
pardon me?, maybe you do
Posted by 10thyrsr
Texas
Member since Oct 2020
1051 posts
Posted on 1/15/26 at 10:16 pm to
quote:

can  a brother get a cliff note


You currently have to go through an FFL to ship firearms. This memo issued by the federal government says that is against the second amendment and cites a number of scenarios that support this. They say those previous rules are unenforceable, so the USPS should allow people and manufacturers to ship guns through USPS now.

Basically abolishes the need for FFL and permits shipping through regular mail.

There are some other intricacies in the federal memo that support second amendment rights, such as being able to have a gun for personal and community defense, but those are too deep for Cliffs.

This post was edited on 1/15/26 at 10:17 pm
Posted by 10thyrsr
Texas
Member since Oct 2020
1051 posts
Posted on 1/15/26 at 10:25 pm to
I suppose the burden of background checks will be placed on the seller. Probably upload your license?
Posted by Don Quixote
Member since May 2023
4353 posts
Posted on 1/15/26 at 10:28 pm to
quote:

background checks


also unconstitutional

you want to do one before selling to someone, knock yourself out but making it a requirement is unconstitutional
Posted by Jugbow
Member since Nov 2025
2252 posts
Posted on 1/15/26 at 10:29 pm to
Good job Pam!
Posted by 10thyrsr
Texas
Member since Oct 2020
1051 posts
Posted on 1/15/26 at 10:30 pm to
quote:

background checks


I was speaking to manufacturers shipping not "face to face".
Posted by scrooster
Resident Ethicist
Member since Jul 2012
42433 posts
Posted on 1/15/26 at 11:41 pm to
quote:

Can a brother get a cliff note

The Post Office is now going to be forced to allow firearms to be mailed through the USPS.

But that's not what's really at issue here.

Legal interstate transportation of lawfully owned firearms by American Citizens is what's at stake.

So states that currently ban tourists or travelers from carrying in their states will be forced to allow them to do so, unhindered and without fear of repercussions if, for whatever reason one is stopped on a trip, from say SC to Maine and you have to travel through all the Northeastern anti-2A states.

It's a huge deal. It's being supported by the Bondi DOJ and it'll likely end up in front of the SCOTUS ... and, it will inevitably lead to national carry laws that will overrule all the blue state bullshite that leaves a licensed gunowner defenseless when in a blue state.

Not only that, but because it also makes legal mailing guns within your state, ... it gives gunowners in blue states the right to carry, own, and protect themselves.

This is very pertinent given the 67 year old man who was sentenced to four years in prison today (a veteran with no criminal history) in NYC, for simply defending himself against a deranged lunatic with 15 prior arrests for violent crimes.

It's got far sweeping ramifications in support of our 2nd Amendment Rights ... our God Given Right to self protection of our loved ones and ourselves.
Posted by Tight 10
Member since Nov 2021
488 posts
Posted on 1/16/26 at 6:26 am to
When I can purchase a suppressor over the counter talk to me
Posted by scrooster
Resident Ethicist
Member since Jul 2012
42433 posts
Posted on 1/16/26 at 10:14 am to
quote:

When I can purchase a suppressor over the counter talk to me

If I may ask, how do you support our Right to Keep and Bear Arms?

Do you contribute monthly to the GOA, the FPC, or even the NRA or that shithook over at the NAGR? How about yearly? Have you ever contributed?

Do you actively support the cause, the industry, by going to events, writing letters to your senators and congressmen, or buying from vendors who have a Round-Up (to the nearest dollar) campaign that helps with the legal battles?

Do you vote for A+ rated 2A politicians?

Do you stay current and knowledgeable about the entire fight against the Marxo-Commie socialist progressive libtards who are constantly trying to take our Rights away ....

.... or is all you care about is being able to buy an over the counter can?

Just asking, given the wording and tone of your contribution to this thread.

You seem like the type that likes the spoils ... but not interested in the fights and battles, or the war, it takes to maintain and regain our 2A Rights.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram