- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

My prediction: Ohio State vs USC play for it all...
Posted on 5/19/09 at 8:28 am
Posted on 5/19/09 at 8:28 am
tOSU > USC.
D1 tennis championship game today at 3(ET) on ESPNU.
Another Buckeye Championship?
... or another second place finish?

D1 tennis championship game today at 3(ET) on ESPNU.
Another Buckeye Championship?
... or another second place finish?
Posted on 5/19/09 at 8:33 am to BuckeyeFan87
Oh shite...this title will fit nicely in with our second consecutive pistol team national title.
Posted on 5/19/09 at 8:40 am to BuckeyeFan87
you're predicting ohio state and usc will play for it all when the matchup has already been set? thats bold.
Posted on 5/19/09 at 8:41 am to bbap
... thought I met get a few rantards in here thinking it was about football.
Posted on 5/19/09 at 8:45 am to BuckeyeFan87
i know this is a tennis topic, but just to burst your bubble...
i don't think tOsu or Oklahoma should be allowed in another NC for the next 5 years.
i don't think tOsu or Oklahoma should be allowed in another NC for the next 5 years.
Posted on 5/19/09 at 8:46 am to Klark Kent
quote:
i don't think tOsu or Oklahoma should be allowed in another NC for the next 5 years.
Don't watch this season then
Posted on 5/19/09 at 8:53 am to SprintFun
and i'm sure it will be deserved with the grueling schedule you both have...hopefully neither will trip up on a Oregon State, Ohio, or Appalacian State like team, but i wouldn't bet against it.
Posted on 5/19/09 at 8:55 am to Klark Kent
Show me the grind that Florida is going through this year please
Posted on 5/19/09 at 8:58 am to Buckeye06
Not really a valid point considering....when they made it to the NC.....they won it, but just to play along:
Florida
Sat. Sept. 5 Charleston Southern
Sat. Sept. 12 Troy
Sat. Sept. 19 Tennessee
Sat. Sept. 26 at Kentucky (Lexington KY)
Sat. Oct. 10 at LSU (Baton Rouge LA)
Sat. Oct. 17 Arkansas (Homecoming)
Sat. Oct. 24 at Mississippi State (Starkville MS)
Sat. Oct. 31 Georgia (Jacksonville FL)
Sat. Nov. 7 Vanderbilt
Sat. Nov. 14 at South Carolina (Columbia SC)
Sat. Nov. 21 Florida International
Sat. Nov. 28 Florida State (Senior Day)
Ohio State
September 5 Navy Columbus, Ohio
September 12 USC Columbus, Ohio
September 19 Toledo Cleveland, Ohio
September 26 Illinois Columbus, Ohio
October 3 Indiana Bloomington, Ind. Octoner 10 Wisconsin Columbus, Ohio
October 17 Purdue West Lafayette, Ind.
October 24 Minnesota Columbus, Ohio
October 31 New Mexico State Columbus, Ohio
November 7 Penn State State College, Penn.
November 14 Iowa Columbus, Ohio November 21 Michigan Ann Arbor, Mich.
neither tough schedules granted, but seriously tOSU plays 2 teams all year.
Florida
Sat. Sept. 5 Charleston Southern
Sat. Sept. 12 Troy
Sat. Sept. 19 Tennessee
Sat. Sept. 26 at Kentucky (Lexington KY)
Sat. Oct. 10 at LSU (Baton Rouge LA)
Sat. Oct. 17 Arkansas (Homecoming)
Sat. Oct. 24 at Mississippi State (Starkville MS)
Sat. Oct. 31 Georgia (Jacksonville FL)
Sat. Nov. 7 Vanderbilt
Sat. Nov. 14 at South Carolina (Columbia SC)
Sat. Nov. 21 Florida International
Sat. Nov. 28 Florida State (Senior Day)
Ohio State
September 5 Navy Columbus, Ohio
September 12 USC Columbus, Ohio
September 19 Toledo Cleveland, Ohio
September 26 Illinois Columbus, Ohio
October 3 Indiana Bloomington, Ind. Octoner 10 Wisconsin Columbus, Ohio
October 17 Purdue West Lafayette, Ind.
October 24 Minnesota Columbus, Ohio
October 31 New Mexico State Columbus, Ohio
November 7 Penn State State College, Penn.
November 14 Iowa Columbus, Ohio November 21 Michigan Ann Arbor, Mich.
neither tough schedules granted, but seriously tOSU plays 2 teams all year.
This post was edited on 5/19/09 at 9:04 am
Posted on 5/19/09 at 9:01 am to Klark Kent
No it plays exactly to your point; you said they shouldn't be allowed in the game.
And Ohio State>Florida on 2009 schedules.
USC and @Penn State are harder games than any on UF's schedule
And Ohio State>Florida on 2009 schedules.
USC and @Penn State are harder games than any on UF's schedule
Posted on 5/19/09 at 9:02 am to Klark Kent
quote:
i don't think tOsu or Oklahoma should be allowed in another NC for the next 5 years.
What if they play each other?
Posted on 5/19/09 at 9:04 am to Buckeye06
quote:
USC and @Penn State are harder games than any on UF's schedule
naw
Posted on 5/19/09 at 9:05 am to bbap
Aside from at LSU, tell me which game is harder?
USC is a top 5 team and no one will argue that. Penn State is a top 15 team, and one of the hardest places to play in CFB.
USC is a top 5 team and no one will argue that. Penn State is a top 15 team, and one of the hardest places to play in CFB.
Posted on 5/19/09 at 9:06 am to Buckeye06
quote:
And Ohio State>Florida on 2009 schedules.
USC and @Penn State are harder games than any on UF's schedule
again, my point is based upon their beat downs in their last NC showings.....neither tOSU nor Oklahoma should be allowed in the NC.
and their upcoming schedules isn't convincing me or anyone one else, besides USC and tOSU homers, that they should be either...
Posted on 5/19/09 at 9:06 am to Buckeye06
i wasnt arguing usc. just penn st. what an overrated program.
Posted on 5/19/09 at 9:08 am to bbap
quote:
i wasnt arguing usc. just penn st. what an overrated program.
Posted on 5/19/09 at 9:09 am to bbap
So What you're telling me is that a team that has something like 20 out of 22 starters different from 2 years before should be penalized from what that team did on the field
I don't know if you watched the national title game this year, but it wasn't too much of a blowout. OU had the ball inside the 5 and didn't get points and if they at least kick a fg there, they are within 1 possession.
Edit: Now I am not saying that if OSU and UF both have 1 loss then OSU should get in; I'm saying if OSU goes through that path unbeaten, you can't say they shouldn't be allowed in the game
I don't know if you watched the national title game this year, but it wasn't too much of a blowout. OU had the ball inside the 5 and didn't get points and if they at least kick a fg there, they are within 1 possession.
Edit: Now I am not saying that if OSU and UF both have 1 loss then OSU should get in; I'm saying if OSU goes through that path unbeaten, you can't say they shouldn't be allowed in the game
This post was edited on 5/19/09 at 9:11 am
Posted on 5/19/09 at 9:10 am to Buckeye06
quote:
So What you're telling me is that a team that has something like 20 out of 22 starters different from 2 years before should be penalized from what that team did on the field
I don't know if you watched the national title game this year, but it wasn't too much of a blowout. OU had the ball inside the 5 and didn't get points and if they at least kick a fg there, they are within 1 possession
are you talking to me? i didnt say shite about anything other than penn state being an overrated program and osu's schedule having two teams on it that are tougher games than anyone on florida's schedule.
This post was edited on 5/19/09 at 9:11 am
Posted on 5/19/09 at 9:13 am to Buckeye06
maybe so, but i think the entire viewing population had a hunch of what the outcome of that game was going to be...
i mean how many shots do you think they should get at it? 2 in 3 years isn't enough?
why not give the boise st.'s of the world a chance, instead of hyping up tOSU every year to only have the same outcome?
i mean how many shots do you think they should get at it? 2 in 3 years isn't enough?
why not give the boise st.'s of the world a chance, instead of hyping up tOSU every year to only have the same outcome?
This post was edited on 5/19/09 at 9:15 am
Popular
Back to top

4




