- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

LSU/UW 2009 vs LSU/UNC 2010
Posted on 9/8/10 at 1:41 pm
Posted on 9/8/10 at 1:41 pm
Looking at both of these games, it is quite strange how similar they both were.
Total Points Scored by LSU:
@ UW = 31
@ UNC = 30
Non-offensive Points:
@ UW = 7
@ UNC = 9
Big play TDs on offense:
@ UW = 2 (Both Toliver TDs are of 35+ yards)
@ UNC = 2 (RS TD and RR TD both of 50+ yards)
Total plays for opponents:
@ UW = 83
@ UNC = 79
Total plays for LSU:
@ UW = 48
@ UNC = 57
Total LSU yards:
@ UW = 321
@ UNC = 313
Total opponents yards:
@ UW = 478
@ UNC = 436
Just some odd similarities. We actually had better YPC that game than this past one also despite out longest run in that game being 21 yards compared to getting a 50 yard run from Shepard. In the end, Ridley had less YPC than both Scott and Williams had in that game as well.
I think he'll be a good one, but I think people are overstating his performance just a tad.
Total Points Scored by LSU:
@ UW = 31
@ UNC = 30
Non-offensive Points:
@ UW = 7
@ UNC = 9
Big play TDs on offense:
@ UW = 2 (Both Toliver TDs are of 35+ yards)
@ UNC = 2 (RS TD and RR TD both of 50+ yards)
Total plays for opponents:
@ UW = 83
@ UNC = 79
Total plays for LSU:
@ UW = 48
@ UNC = 57
Total LSU yards:
@ UW = 321
@ UNC = 313
Total opponents yards:
@ UW = 478
@ UNC = 436
Just some odd similarities. We actually had better YPC that game than this past one also despite out longest run in that game being 21 yards compared to getting a 50 yard run from Shepard. In the end, Ridley had less YPC than both Scott and Williams had in that game as well.
I think he'll be a good one, but I think people are overstating his performance just a tad.
Posted on 9/8/10 at 1:43 pm to LSUMafia
be prepared for more of the same from last year.
Posted on 9/8/10 at 1:44 pm to LSUMafia
quote:
Total plays for LSU:
@ UW = 48
@ UNC = 57
This is pathetic!
Posted on 9/8/10 at 1:45 pm to LSUMafia
This fact wasn't lost on me, either.
But, I wasn't up for the research or discussion.
Carry on.
But, I wasn't up for the research or discussion.
Carry on.
Posted on 9/8/10 at 1:46 pm to wahoocs
What was the score against Washington with 10 minutes to go? Also, our total amount of rushing yards was close to 200.
Posted on 9/8/10 at 1:48 pm to LSUMafia
that's because LSU has not improved/developed from a year ago.
Posted on 9/8/10 at 1:54 pm to LSUMafia
quote:
LSU/UW 2009 vs LSU/UNC 2010
Looking at both of these games, it is quite strange how similar they both were.
Total Points Scored by LSU:
@ UW = 31
@ UNC = 30
Non-offensive Points:
@ UW = 7
@ UNC = 9
Big play TDs on offense:
@ UW = 2 (Both Toliver TDs are of 35+ yards)
@ UNC = 2 (RS TD and RR TD both of 50+ yards)
Total plays for opponents:
@ UW = 83
@ UNC = 79
Total plays for LSU:
@ UW = 48
@ UNC = 57
Total LSU yards:
@ UW = 321
@ UNC = 313
Total opponents yards:
@ UW = 478
@ UNC = 436
quote:
Ridley had less YPC than both Scott and Williams had in that game.
Just to make this statement!!
quote:
I think he'll be a good one
I call bullshite you liar. You dont believe this at all. All someone has to do is read your post history and they can see how full of shite you are.
Your statement yesterday was "Ridley fumbled simply because he's an idiot"
Posted on 9/8/10 at 1:56 pm to bmy
quote:
What was the score against Washington with 10 minutes to go?
Score was 24-13 going into the 4th quarter, so a double digit lead, but I am not saying they played out identically, just that the stats were similar.
quote:
Also, our total amount of rushing yards was close to 200.
Umm.. WRONG. We had 149 yards rushing against UW. It's the stats genius. We had more against UNC (162), but had more rushes.
Posted on 9/8/10 at 1:57 pm to LSUMafia
You're missing something. LSU never dominated in the UW game like we did against UNC.
This post was edited on 9/8/10 at 1:58 pm
Posted on 9/8/10 at 2:03 pm to LSUTigerfaninHtown
UW had something like 160 yds rushing
UNC had 24
UNC had 24
Posted on 9/8/10 at 2:03 pm to LSUMafia
How many backups and freshmen did we play in the UW game?
Posted on 9/8/10 at 2:07 pm to LSUMafia
End results close but two completely different paths. LSU struggled from the jump against the Huskies and secured the game late. They dominated the stats against UNC and had to hold on for dear life. Washington being a true road game probably had the Tigers a bit behind the 8 ball as well. Between the turnovers, missed FG, blown coverages and lame officiating it's amazing LSU still won that game. Depleted roster notwithstanding, UNC still has a pretty good team.
Posted on 9/8/10 at 2:10 pm to loustuni
quote:
This is pathetic!
we won
Posted on 9/8/10 at 2:12 pm to LSUTigerfaninHtown
quote:
You're missing something. LSU never dominated in the UW game like we did against UNC.
This I agree with. However that scares me more that we were UP by so much on UNC and let them back in the game. There is a problem. Can't pinpoint it, but there is a definent problem.
Posted on 9/8/10 at 2:12 pm to LSUMafia
quote:
it is quite strange how similar they both were
But for the 5 to 1 T/O margin between the games.
Posted on 9/8/10 at 2:12 pm to RANDY44
quote:reminded me of the post-Katrina Tenn game and that's never a good thing
it's amazing LSU still won that game
Posted on 9/8/10 at 2:15 pm to dukke v
quote:
There is a problem. Can't pinpoint it, but there is a definent problem.
Maybe you don't have enough "want" to pinpoint the problem....
Posted on 9/8/10 at 2:16 pm to CptBengal
quote:
Maybe you don't have enough "want" to pinpoint the problem....
Got to come up with some new material
Posted on 9/8/10 at 2:16 pm to RANDY44
I'm sorry.
I thought I remembered us trailing to both at the end of the first quarter.
I seem to remember UNC having to be held to a FG inside of our 5 tied 7-7.
If you'd like to point out another difference, one was in a dome in the state of Georgia, and the other was outdoors in the state of Washington.
Just get ready to sweat a ton of games this year, except Florida and Alabama.
You won't have to sweat those.
I thought I remembered us trailing to both at the end of the first quarter.
I seem to remember UNC having to be held to a FG inside of our 5 tied 7-7.
If you'd like to point out another difference, one was in a dome in the state of Georgia, and the other was outdoors in the state of Washington.
Just get ready to sweat a ton of games this year, except Florida and Alabama.
You won't have to sweat those.
Posted on 9/8/10 at 2:17 pm to dukke v
quote:
However that scares me more that we were UP by so much on UNC and let them back in the game. There is a problem. Can't pinpoint it, but there is a definent problem.
They don't seem to have that will to put people away. Kind of idiotic to think they don't need to score anymore than a 20 point lead. This is 2010 not 1980. Teams can score 28 in one quarter with ease these days!
Popular
Back to top

11





