- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

TAF / Joe Alleva question???
Posted on 1/3/15 at 4:57 pm
Posted on 1/3/15 at 4:57 pm
How much freedom does the AD have in regards to contracts with coaches when spending TAF money? Does he have a open checkbook? ( I doubt ) At what point does he have to talk to the real power of LSU athletics ( TAF ) and ask permission how much he can offer or spend on a particular coach?
Posted on 1/3/15 at 4:57 pm to Ponchy Tiger
TAF isn't as powerful as people like to think
Posted on 1/3/15 at 4:59 pm to Choctaw
Perhaps not, but they do put enough money into the program that they get have some input. When you are looking at a self-supporting athletic program, and part of that support comes from a booster foundation such as TAF, they are going to get some input.
Posted on 1/3/15 at 5:03 pm to Choctaw
TAF has very little say on contracts at all....it is BOS and a few donors and the Chancellor, the TAF Board etc is not involved in day to day AD operations. It's that simple. Joe does not have autonomy either, he has a budget (BOS approves) and a chancellor to answer to. He, Verge, Miriam (women), Nunez, all play roles and make proposals to BOS. In case of football, Les makes proposals to Joe and or goes around him....fact...some get approved but not all. Power is mostly at BOS...and Chancelor etc.
Posted on 1/3/15 at 5:03 pm to Choctaw
quote:
TAF isn't as powerful as people like to think
I have no way of knowing, but life experience tells me that those that controls the money controls the house. TAF provides the largest percentage of coaching salaries. So common sense would say that their would be a certain amount of consultation when high dollars are being spent. Is there a point where TAF says no?
Posted on 1/3/15 at 5:05 pm to Choctaw
I would feel better if they were more powerful. we have an assload of money that floods in from the TAF.
Posted on 1/3/15 at 5:07 pm to Ponchy Tiger
Didn't we have this thread today already?
Posted on 1/3/15 at 5:11 pm to top100lsudonor
quote:
TAF has very little say on contracts at all....it is BOS and a few donors and the Chancellor, the TAF Board etc is not involved in day to day AD operations. It's that simple. Joe does not have autonomy either, he has a budget (BOS approves) and a chancellor to answer to. He, Verge, Miriam (women), Nunez, all play roles and make proposals to BOS. In case of football, Les makes proposals to Joe and or goes around him....fact...some get approved but not all. Power is mostly at BOS...and Chancelor etc.
Thanks, that answers alot
Posted on 1/3/15 at 5:11 pm to notiger1997
quote:
Didn't we have this thread today already?
Possibly, I don't live on here.
Popular
Back to top

2





