- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Would you veto?
Posted on 11/2/17 at 7:38 pm
Posted on 11/2/17 at 7:38 pm
I've always hated when trades are vetoed but this one made me scratch my head.
After the Watson news broke sixth place team traded Fuller to last place owner for Chris Thompson.
This is a twelve team full ppr league with 1.2k to winner. Would be a stretch with Watson healthy but I wouldn't begrudge an owner for smartly selling high. However without Watson, Fuller has no value.
What are your thoughts?
P.S. I'm not going to vote to veto. No proof of collusion other than this being a horrible trade.
After the Watson news broke sixth place team traded Fuller to last place owner for Chris Thompson.
This is a twelve team full ppr league with 1.2k to winner. Would be a stretch with Watson healthy but I wouldn't begrudge an owner for smartly selling high. However without Watson, Fuller has no value.
What are your thoughts?
P.S. I'm not going to vote to veto. No proof of collusion other than this being a horrible trade.
5
Posted on 11/2/17 at 7:39 pm to Shunface
quote:
P.S. I'm not going to vote to veto. No proof of collusion other than this being a horrible trade.
That's your answer
Posted on 11/2/17 at 7:41 pm to Shunface
You are assuming everything
Fuller has value
That trade is fine
Fuller has value
That trade is fine
Posted on 11/2/17 at 7:42 pm to VermilionTiger
quote:
Fuller has value
Lulz
Posted on 11/2/17 at 7:42 pm to Shunface
Fuller for Thompson is a fine trade.
Posted on 11/2/17 at 7:44 pm to Gtothemoney
I know that's my answer. I was more curious of the boards thoughts.
But judging by the second response people seem to think Fuller will be able to maintain his 54% td to catch ratio (which is absurd and due for regression to begin with) with Savage now that Watson is done.
But judging by the second response people seem to think Fuller will be able to maintain his 54% td to catch ratio (which is absurd and due for regression to begin with) with Savage now that Watson is done.
Posted on 11/2/17 at 7:45 pm to Shunface
Let people run their teams. Just bc you think fuller won’t be any good ROS is not a good reason to veto.
Posted on 11/2/17 at 7:46 pm to Boomshockalocka
Hence why I said I would not vote to veto.
Sometimes reading the post will help.
Sometimes reading the post will help.
Posted on 11/2/17 at 7:52 pm to Shunface
Stop being so defensive, bra. No collusion no veto.
Posted on 11/2/17 at 7:54 pm to Boomshockalocka
So you believe fuller will maintain his 50% catch to td ratio? With Tom Savage?
I'll put $100 down he doesn't score three more ros.
I'll put $100 down he doesn't score three more ros.
Posted on 11/2/17 at 7:56 pm to Gtothemoney
Not defensive and I'm not vetoing.
As I said, it's a horrible trade but that isn't grounds to veto. I'm more blown away by everyone thinking Fuller maintains this production.
I want to play in leagues with y'all next year.
As I said, it's a horrible trade but that isn't grounds to veto. I'm more blown away by everyone thinking Fuller maintains this production.
I want to play in leagues with y'all next year.
Posted on 11/2/17 at 7:57 pm to Shunface
No I don’t think that. I said i let other people run their own team. When you get to vetoing other peoples trade Guess what the chances of getting your own trade vetoed goes up bc if you don’t let other people trade why would they let you?
Posted on 11/2/17 at 7:59 pm to Shunface
Post your trophy case bubba. If you looking to throw around money....
Posted on 11/2/17 at 8:01 pm to Boomshockalocka
And your 100% correct.
probably should have the thread title as "How horrible is this trade"
Throw the word veto in and no matter the subject matter the only response is no veto, no other dialogue.
probably should have the thread title as "How horrible is this trade"
Throw the word veto in and no matter the subject matter the only response is no veto, no other dialogue.
Posted on 11/2/17 at 8:08 pm to Shunface
quote:
probably should have the thread title as "How horrible is this trade
Yep
quote:
Throw the word veto in and no matter the subject matter the only response is no veto, no other dialogue.
That's because any league that allows league vetos is bush league. You want to have commish veto to prevent collusion, fine but allowing the league to veto other people's decisions is a clown car.
Posted on 11/2/17 at 8:11 pm to Boomshockalocka
So you don't think Fuller scores 3 more td's this year. Good to know we agree on that.
Where the hell to I find the trophy case in the app.
Where the hell to I find the trophy case in the app.
Posted on 11/2/17 at 8:15 pm to Shunface
Yahoo = goat fantasy football host keeps all of the trophies you have won over the years in a really nice looking case.
Posted on 11/2/17 at 8:25 pm to Shunface
quote:
So you believe fuller will maintain his 50% catch to td ratio? With Tom Savage?
Literally no one said that. Quit being a defensive bitch
It’s a fine trade
Posted on 11/2/17 at 8:28 pm to Shunface
If not collusion no veto. Can't blame the 6th place guy for the last place guy's lack of knowing what the news is
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News