Domain: tiger-web1.srvr.media3.us Shonn Greene for Matt Forte | Page 2 | Fantasy Sports
Started By
Message

re: Shonn Greene for Matt Forte

Posted on 8/30/10 at 1:59 pm to
Posted by Shankopotomus
Social Distanced
Member since Feb 2009
21082 posts
Posted on 8/30/10 at 1:59 pm to
quote:

So Mike Martz is in town and there are concerns that he is going to put a damper on Matt Forte’s fantasy stock. Bringing even more questions was the arrival of Chester Taylor from the rival Minnesota Vikings. Since Taylor’s specialty up north was catching passes, people assume that will be his role in Chicago.

People forget that Matt Forte led the league in 2008 for Running Back receptions with 63. He was third for Running Back Receptions in 2009 with 57. The man can catch the ball. Chester Taylor arriving isn’t going to make him less capable
Posted by GynoSandberg
Bay St Louis, MS
Member since Jan 2006
74173 posts
Posted on 8/30/10 at 2:07 pm to
People are going nuts over Greene and he hasn't proven shite in the NFL for the most part. LT will steal more carries from him than Taylor will steal from Forte. Also, Sanchez will dictate his success.

People forget Forte ran for over 1200 yards as a rookie and caught 63 passed for another 500. Last year he was struggling with recovering from knee surgery. This year he is healthy. People who took Forte are getting great value, and he is more valuable than Taylor is Martz's system.
Posted by Billy Mays
Member since Jan 2009
25816 posts
Posted on 8/30/10 at 2:08 pm to
quote:

Will Forte be the Marshall Faulk of the Chicago Bears? Possibly.


Warner > Cutler
Faulk > Forte
Bruce > Hester
Holt >>> Aromashadou
Knox = Hakim
STL OL > CHI OL


ISWYDT, but Forte was pretty bad last year and there are questions about the supporting cast.

We don't know what the Martz effect will have on his productivity yet, either.

For now, I'd stick with Greene over Forte in all formats.
Posted by GynoSandberg
Bay St Louis, MS
Member since Jan 2006
74173 posts
Posted on 8/30/10 at 2:25 pm to
quote:

Warner > Cutler
Faulk > Forte
Bruce > Hester
Holt >>> Aromashadou
Knox = Hakim
STL OL > CHI OL


I don't think you understood "Will Forte be the Marshall Faulk of the Chicago Bears? Possibly."

quote:

but Forte was pretty bad last yea


Again, coming off major surgery that usually takes 2 years to fully heal. Why was his rookie year so good and not last year?

quote:

there are questions about the supporting cast.


Like? A decent QB who can sling it? A offensive tactician as an O-Coordinator? A stable of young, talented, fast receivers? A damn good TE? One of the best backup RBs in the league? The only questions comes with the OL, IMO.

I'd give the slight nod to Greene still, but Forte will surprise a lot of people. He's a damn good back.

Posted by TheFranchise
The Stick
Member since Feb 2005
6321 posts
Posted on 8/30/10 at 2:42 pm to
I get: Shonn Greene, Malcolm Floyd

I give: Michael Bush, DeSean Jackson

Thoughts?
Posted by GynoSandberg
Bay St Louis, MS
Member since Jan 2006
74173 posts
Posted on 8/30/10 at 2:49 pm to
I'd take Greene and Floyd in a heartbeat. Floyd should put up some good numbers with Rivers throwing the ball around in SD.

Bush is already hurt, which could give McFadden the opportunity to prove himself and not look back. Plus Oakland is pretty shitty and now Campbell is banged up as well.

Jackson may very well be the best player in this deal, but it isn't worth taking on Bush to get him.
Posted by Billy Mays
Member since Jan 2009
25816 posts
Posted on 8/30/10 at 2:55 pm to
quote:

I don't think you understood "Will Forte be the Marshall Faulk of the Chicago Bears? Possibly


WTF didn't I understand? He's not Marshall Faulk and we don't know if Martz still has it or not.

quote:

Again, coming off major surgery that usually takes 2 years to fully heal. Why was his rookie year so good and not last year?


Maybe he couldn't quite overcome the injury and had a minor sophomore slump? It happens to 2nd year vets all the time who beast their rookie years (Bowe, Royal, etc.)

quote:


Like? A decent QB who can sling it? A offensive tactician as an O-Coordinator? A stable of young, talented, fast receivers? A damn good TE? One of the best backup RBs in the league? The only questions comes with the OL, IMO.


The Bears were meh last year, and until proven otherwise, they are still meh.

quote:

I'd give the slight nod to Greene still, but Forte will surprise a lot of people. He's a damn good back.


I agree it's not far off, but Greene is the consensus amongst pretty much everyone to be the higher draft pick, ergo the better fantasy back. I thought Forte was good his rookie year, but not great. Last year was not good.

I actually like Forte better than his ADP, tho
This post was edited on 8/30/10 at 3:00 pm
Posted by GynoSandberg
Bay St Louis, MS
Member since Jan 2006
74173 posts
Posted on 8/30/10 at 3:33 pm to
quote:

WTF didn't I understand? He's not Marshall Faulk and we don't know if Martz still has it or not.


He meant that Forte will play a role similar to what Faulk played, not that he actually will be Marshall Faulk. And do coordinators just "lose it"?
Posted by Billy Mays
Member since Jan 2009
25816 posts
Posted on 8/30/10 at 3:42 pm to
quote:

And do coordinators just "lose it"?


A couple of meh seasons in STL where he wore out his welcome, followed by no production in Detroit or San Fran. He's been a year removed from the NFL, and now he's back.

I'd say he needs to prove that he's still a good coordinator in the NFL . He's definitely not categorized as an offensive genius like he used to be.
Posted by GynoSandberg
Bay St Louis, MS
Member since Jan 2006
74173 posts
Posted on 8/30/10 at 3:47 pm to
The talent was pretty limited in detroit and san fran. i guess we will see
Posted by el tigre
your heart
Member since Sep 2003
49712 posts
Posted on 8/30/10 at 4:01 pm to
quote:

And do coordinators just "lose it"?


some do....esp ones known for a specific innovative system. That system becomes less unique, defenses evolve and get used to seeing it.
Posted by jrholdman
Baton Rouge
Member since Jul 2010
140 posts
Posted on 8/30/10 at 4:03 pm to
I wouldn't mess with it, Chester Taylor looked really good
Posted by GynoSandberg
Bay St Louis, MS
Member since Jan 2006
74173 posts
Posted on 8/30/10 at 4:14 pm to
quote:

some do....esp ones known for a specific innovative system. That system becomes less unique, defenses evolve and get used to seeing it.


any specific examples i can look up? i know of bill walsh's system, that's about it.

quote:

I wouldn't mess with it, Chester Taylor looked really good


Forte's 89 yard run looked really good too
Posted by BhamTigah
Lurker since Jan 2003
Member since Jan 2007
17464 posts
Posted on 8/30/10 at 4:59 pm to
quote:

I get: Shonn Greene, Malcolm Floyd

I give: Michael Bush, DeSean Jackson

Thoughts?


Only one thought...why are you here asking us instead of pulling the trigger before the other guy changes his mind?
Posted by Me Bite
A.K.A. - Bite Me
Member since Oct 2007
7271 posts
Posted on 8/30/10 at 10:32 pm to
So after all this discussion, it's stil about a 50/50 split.
Posted by adammwilson
Carrollton (GA)
Member since Jul 2009
21519 posts
Posted on 8/30/10 at 10:34 pm to
quote:

I'm thinking about giving up Shonn Greene for Matt Forte. What do y'all think?


definitely not. Although I've heard Forte looks good.
Posted by diat150
Louisiana
Member since Jun 2005
47480 posts
Posted on 8/31/10 at 7:43 am to
the bears have one of the worst lines in the league with a pass happy mike martz. the jets have one of the best lines in the league with a run happy rex ryan.
Posted by Me Bite
A.K.A. - Bite Me
Member since Oct 2007
7271 posts
Posted on 9/1/10 at 11:29 pm to
FWIW... I decided to keep Shonn Greene. Thanks for all the input.
Posted by ISDSTiger
Member since Sep 2006
5071 posts
Posted on 9/2/10 at 7:43 am to
quote:

the bears have one of the worst lines in the league with a pass happy mike martz. the jets have one of the best lines in the league with a run happy rex ryan.


Posted by LSUChamp06
Kansas City
Member since Nov 2007
2860 posts
Posted on 9/2/10 at 10:43 am to
Cutler has ruined Forte. Forte would do well with a good QB and a decent line.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram