- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: TDFL Week 8
Posted on 10/27/11 at 3:07 pm to TigerPhan27
Posted on 10/27/11 at 3:07 pm to TigerPhan27
quote:
Jennings/Pettigrew for Foster
You really offered that?
And he really responded with that?
Send this clown to the Droppings Conference!
Posted on 10/27/11 at 3:09 pm to reddman
quote:
You really offered that?
And he really responded with that?
Send this clown to the Droppings Conference
yes so imagine how far off you were.
He would do Peterson and Pettigrew for Foster though
Posted on 10/27/11 at 3:10 pm to reddman
I offered him MJD/Finley for Foster
Jennings/Pettigrew is a better deal than that
Jennings/Pettigrew is a better deal than that
Posted on 10/27/11 at 3:10 pm to reddman
Gnat can get Foster if he wants to give up Peterson +1. You not grabbing the #1 fantasy rb from here out for a jennings and pettigrew.
Posted on 10/27/11 at 3:11 pm to Boomshockalocka
Oh snap. SFP is alive.
Posted on 10/27/11 at 3:12 pm to Boomshockalocka
quote:
Gnat can get Foster if he wants to give up Peterson +1. You not grabbing the #1 fantasy rb from here out for a jennings and pettigrew.
Posted on 10/27/11 at 3:13 pm to Boomshockalocka
Jennings has the same points as Peterson and plays a position which you blow at. You have another #1 RB in Fred Jackson. You also get a top TE which is another position you blow at. You aren't getting Peterson and Pettigrew for Foster, that makes no sense whatsoever for me.
I feel Jennings/Pettigrew is too much for Foster but i'm trying to gamble since i'm 3-4 and pretty much middle of the pack although I'm .8 points away from being 5-2. You are 2-5, I'm not sure why you wouldn't want to improve your team at positions you sorely lack.
GLTY
I feel Jennings/Pettigrew is too much for Foster but i'm trying to gamble since i'm 3-4 and pretty much middle of the pack although I'm .8 points away from being 5-2. You are 2-5, I'm not sure why you wouldn't want to improve your team at positions you sorely lack.
GLTY
Posted on 10/27/11 at 3:15 pm to Boomshockalocka
quote:
Gnat can get Foster if he wants to give up Peterson +1. You not grabbing the #1 fantasy rb from here out for a jennings and pettigrew.
Wow. You suck at this.
Posted on 10/27/11 at 3:15 pm to GynoSandberg
apparantly the #4 WR and #6 TE is not enough to pry the "#1" RB
Posted on 10/27/11 at 3:15 pm to reddman
quote:
Wow. You suck at this.
that's why I drafted him into the conference, now I guess the joke's on me
Posted on 10/27/11 at 3:16 pm to reddman
This is the same situation as Nobes with that Graham offer.
It's a must do for that team IMO
It's a must do for that team IMO
Posted on 10/27/11 at 3:16 pm to reddman
quote:
Send this clown to the Droppings Conference!
We will trade you guys LE for Boom. No questions asked.
Posted on 10/27/11 at 3:17 pm to LSUAlum2001
quote:
We will trade you guys LE for Boom. No questions asked.
we would need karma and rouge thrown in, we will put you in a port
Posted on 10/27/11 at 3:20 pm to TigerPhan27
not sure how to take that :/
Posted on 10/27/11 at 3:20 pm to TigerPhan27
I'm .8 from being 4-3 what's your point? Get Foster AND Jackson in my lineup together and healthy for the 2nd week all year starting now til the end of the year. I'll take my chances with what I've got now.
Posted on 10/27/11 at 3:21 pm to reddman
Boom's WR's are David Nelson, Moss, Jenkins, Burress, Simpson, and Walter and he just told me he doesn't have a need and will be able to make the playoffs with Foster and Fred Jackson.

Posted on 10/27/11 at 3:22 pm to PortCityTiger24
quote:
not sure how to take that :/
I personally would have offered Geaux and Boom for LE, Rouge, and Karma.
Why? Because Geaux likes penis.
Posted on 10/27/11 at 3:22 pm to PortCityTiger24
quote:
not sure how to take that :/
just needed to trade one of our leaders if we were getting LE. nothing personal
Posted on 10/27/11 at 3:23 pm to reddman
quote:
Why? Because Geaux likes penis.
You can keep him. Unless we also get CE Tiger.
I must say I'm a little shocked anyone was willing to trade away Rodgers.
Popular
Back to top



4




