- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: TNF Thread: Colts @ Broncos
Posted on 10/6/22 at 11:06 pm to TackySweater
Posted on 10/6/22 at 11:06 pm to TackySweater
Lat Murray is simply depth. No meaningful Carries without injuries
0
Posted on 10/6/22 at 11:07 pm to TackySweater
quote:
No lol
Because Melvin Gordon is not that good, he has fumbling issues, they picked up another mediocre RB, and they don’t trust him at all. This was never going to be the Melvin Gordon show.
You have no clue what you’re talking about, do you?
Posted on 10/6/22 at 11:11 pm to RB10
quote:
- Melvin Gordon: 52% snaps, 15 carries, 3 targets (103 yards)
- Mike Boone: 46% snaps, 7 carries, 3 targets (85 yards)
Gordon had 5 carries inside the 15
Posted on 10/6/22 at 11:11 pm to RB10
quote:
You have no clue what you’re talking about, do you?
I mean. I’m backing up my claim.
You just keep laughing and not saying anything to backup yours.
Again. Anyone who thrift things were going to change simply wasn’t thinking logically.
Posted on 10/6/22 at 11:14 pm to TackySweater
quote:
I mean. I’m backing up my claim.
No you aren’t. You’re just posting a bunch of nonsense.
quote:
You just keep laughing and not saying anything to backup yours.
There’s nothing for me to back up. I thought Gordon would see increased usage, which he did. It was just a surprise that Boone was given entire drives instead of just spelling him.
quote:
Again. Anyone who thrift things were going to change simply wasn’t thinking logically.
Except they did change. Gordon was the lead back.
Posted on 10/6/22 at 11:19 pm to RB10
quote:
No you aren’t. You’re just posting a bunch of nonsense.
Please point out what’s nonsense here.
quote:
Because Melvin Gordon is not that good, he has fumbling issues, they picked up another mediocre RB, and they don’t trust him at all. This was never going to be the Melvin Gordon show.
quote:
Except they did change. Gordon was the lead back.
Ok you got me there. 52% vs 46%
Big time lead back there.
Posted on 10/6/22 at 11:24 pm to TackySweater
quote:
Ok you got me there. 52% vs 46% Big time lead back there.
Correct. 18 opportunities to 10 opportunities shows who’s the lead dog.
Posted on 10/6/22 at 11:31 pm to RB10
quote:
Correct. 18 opportunities to 10 opportunities shows who’s the lead dog.
Sure they wanted to give him more chances to prove himself as the vet. He did himself zero favors with the extra chances.
This small gap is only going to get less going forward.
This post was edited on 10/6/22 at 11:32 pm
Posted on 10/6/22 at 11:35 pm to TackySweater
quote:
Sure they wanted to give him more chances to prove himself as the vet. He did himself zero favors with the extra chances.
This small gap is only going to get less going forward.
Wtf
Posted on 10/6/22 at 11:42 pm to TackySweater
quote:
What’s funny?
Your takes. Have I not made that clear?
Posted on 10/6/22 at 11:45 pm to RB10
quote:
Sure they wanted to give him more chances to prove himself as the vet. He did himself zero favors with the extra chances. This small gap is only going to get less going forward.
Yea but tell me here what’s funny
Cause it’s all true and it’s all pointing to him not being the main guy by a big margin like he should be.
He should be dominating this backfield with Williams out. But he’s in close to a 50/50 split with Mike freaking Boone lol
This post was edited on 10/6/22 at 11:47 pm
Posted on 10/6/22 at 11:47 pm to TackySweater
quote:
Yea but tell me here what’s funny
Claiming a guy totaling 104 yards on 18 touches “did himself zero favors” is fricking dumb bro.
I’m not sure how else to spell it out for you.
Posted on 10/6/22 at 11:51 pm to RB10
quote:
Claiming a guy totaling 104 yards on 18 touches “did himself zero favors” is fricking dumb bro.
He had 5.7yds per touch
Boone had 8.5yds per touch
Gordon had 5 touches inside the 15 with shite to show for it
He def didn’t do himself any favors with his increased usage.
Like I’ve been saying. This wasn’t and isn’t going to be the Melvin Gordon show. And it def should be. He’s not good.
This post was edited on 10/6/22 at 11:53 pm
Posted on 10/6/22 at 11:54 pm to TackySweater
quote:
Gordon had 5 touches inside the 15 with shite to show for it
I’ll take the guy who got 65% of the running back opportunities, including the important scoring opportunities any day.
quote:
He def didn’t do himself any favors with his increased usage.
Repeating shitty takes doesn’t make them better. Just saying.
Posted on 10/6/22 at 11:55 pm to RB10
quote:
Repeating shitty takes doesn’t make them better. Just saying.
So Gordon was more efficient tonight?
Posted on 10/7/22 at 12:04 am to TackySweater
quote:
So Gordon was more efficient tonight?
Did I say that? Are you under the impression that this is the first time a backup has been more efficient on fewer touches?
Boone was solid tonight, but he wasn’t anything special. Gordon will continue to see the bulk of the workload this season, and you’ll continue to be wrong.
Posted on 10/7/22 at 12:11 am to TackySweater
TBH, not sure of many RBs who would ball out against the Colts run D. He did better than I expected
Posted on 10/7/22 at 12:14 am to RB10
quote:
Are you under the impression that this is the first time a backup has been more efficient on fewer touches?
No lol. But when you have the chance to come in and claim the lead role and take the backups out of the equation, and you do shot with it, then signs point to you not being that good.
Like I said before, this was his chance with Williams out of the equation, to come prove that he can be the guy. He absolutely didn’t do that. And what’s worse is that Boone was more efficient with less opportunities. This coaching staff is dumb beyond measure, but I don’t think they miss this fact.
quote:
Boone was solid tonight, but he wasn’t anything special.
He only put up 8.5yds per touch to Gordon’s 5.7. So if he wasn’t special, then wtf was Gordon? Lol
quote:
Gordon will continue to see the bulk of the workload this season,
If you want to quibble and use semantics on the term “bulk” 52% vs 46% then go ahead. I wouldn’t say a majority is the same as the bulk. Reality is, he had a chance to put a lock on this situation and be the 75/25 guy but he shite himself and we are looking him getting 50-55% going forward. If he was good, he’d be commanding higher and that’s just not going to happen.
Posted on 10/7/22 at 12:24 am to TackySweater
Gordon got 65% of the RB opportunities, including all of the scoring ones.
The rest of the shite you keep posting about is lagniappe. Gordon is the clear lead back.
The rest of the shite you keep posting about is lagniappe. Gordon is the clear lead back.
Page 6 of 10
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News