- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 10/7/22 at 12:29 am to RB10
quote:
including all of the scoring ones.
And did nothing with lol
quote:
Gordon is the clear lead back.
Who had a lower efficiency than Mike Boone lol
Posted on 10/7/22 at 12:30 am to TackySweater
quote:
So we just ignore opportunities and snap counts now? Lol
Seriously dude, do you struggle with reading comprehension?
I’ve posted several times about Gordon having 65% of the RB opportunities.
Posted on 10/7/22 at 12:32 am to TackySweater
quote:
And did nothing with lol
Don’t care. Getting those touches > Not getting them.
quote:
Who had a lower efficiency than Mike Boone lol
Don’t care. For running backs, volume is more important than efficiency.
Posted on 10/7/22 at 12:33 am to RB10
quote:
I’ve posted several times about Gordon having 65% of the RB opportunities.
While ignoring the bigger picture.
You can’t just pick the one stat in your favor and roll with it.
Posted on 10/7/22 at 12:35 am to RB10
quote:
For running backs, volume is more important than efficiency.
Not for a coaching g staff. Even an inept one.
Posted on 10/7/22 at 12:41 am to RB10
quote:
Don’t care. Getting those touches > Not getting them.
Better efficiency numbers mean those touches will go to the more efficient back going forward. Murray didn’t even play and he will get his share. You think that’s coming from Gordon or Boone? Hint: it’s gonna mean less opportunities for Gordon.
Posted on 10/7/22 at 12:46 am to TackySweater
quote:
Better efficiency numbers mean those touches will go to the more efficient back going forward. Murray didn’t even play and he will get his share. You think that’s coming from Gordon or Boone? Hint: it’s gonna mean less opportunities for Gordon.
If Murray carves out any sort of relevant role Boone is going back to 3rd downs and 3 opportunities a game, like he was getting before Williams got hurt.
Posted on 10/7/22 at 12:50 am to RB10
Boone isn’t going anywhere.
I know you think Gordon is the guy. But he’s just not.
I know you think Gordon is the guy. But he’s just not.
Posted on 10/7/22 at 12:51 am to TackySweater
quote:
Boone isn’t going anywhere.
Nah, he’ll still be on the roster.
quote:
I know you think Gordon is the guy. But he’s just not.
He was tonight.
Posted on 10/7/22 at 12:53 am to RB10
quote:
He was tonight.
By a small margin. And Boone did more with less.
Posted on 10/7/22 at 5:59 am to TackySweater
Murray is going to come into Denver and get 75% snap share.
Because, fantasy really do be like that.
Because, fantasy really do be like that.
Posted on 10/7/22 at 6:03 am to TheRouxGuru
quote:
I’d like to get her in the flex position for week 6
You win.
Posted on 10/7/22 at 10:52 am to RB10
quote:
For running backs, volume is more important than efficiency.
Unless you're CEH apparently.
Posted on 10/7/22 at 11:22 am to RB10
Boone also ran 19 routes to Gordon’s 21
Gordon is fine but it doesnt appear Williams’ injury is really going to boost him in anyway. That’s a split backfield by NFL standards
The elephant in the room is his fumbling. Broncos are already an embarrassment, I question how long they let it go on, especially with Murray also lurking
Gordon is fine but it doesnt appear Williams’ injury is really going to boost him in anyway. That’s a split backfield by NFL standards
The elephant in the room is his fumbling. Broncos are already an embarrassment, I question how long they let it go on, especially with Murray also lurking
Posted on 10/7/22 at 11:26 am to GynoSandberg
Gordon will be a Flex as long as the volume remains consistent. Boone will be a spot flex start if you’re desperate. Murray will be irrelevant other than stealing touches from both backs.
That offense is gross so I don’t see any reason to start any of them unless you have to. The scoring opportunities are obviously going to be few and far between.
That offense is gross so I don’t see any reason to start any of them unless you have to. The scoring opportunities are obviously going to be few and far between.
This post was edited on 10/7/22 at 11:29 am
Posted on 10/7/22 at 11:29 am to BhamTigah
quote:
Unless you're CEH apparently.
TD regression is coming for Clyde at some point. When it does he better be getting more than 10 opportunities or people are going to be hurting.
Posted on 10/7/22 at 12:20 pm to RB10
quote:
TD regression is coming for Clyde at some point. When it does he better be getting more than 10 opportunities or people are going to be hurting.
20 touches last week, fingers crossed his average will be closer to this number than 10 going forward
I think Pacheco is overtaking McKinnon btw. Clyde owners who have room might want to add Pacheco.
This post was edited on 10/7/22 at 12:25 pm
Posted on 10/7/22 at 12:32 pm to DeathValley85
quote:
20 touches last week, fingers crossed his average will be closer to this number than 10 going forward
They definitely went to him to ice the game. 8 of his touch were on their final 2 drives, 5 on the final drive.
quote:
I think Pacheco is overtaking McKinnon btw. Clyde owners who have room might want to add Pacheco.
Definitely agree with this, which is good for both Pacheco and Clyde.
This post was edited on 10/7/22 at 12:33 pm
Posted on 10/7/22 at 8:04 pm to GynoSandberg
quote:
Gordon is fine but it doesnt appear Williams’ injury is really going to boost him in anyway. That’s a split backfield by NFL standards The elephant in the room is his fumbling. Broncos are already an embarrassment, I question how long they let it go on, especially with Murray also lurking
Everything I said last night. RB didn’t agree and said Gordon was and is the lead guy but that’s just not true.
quote:
it doesnt appear Williams’ injury is really going to boost him in anyway.
And Williams injury should have def given him a boost but it didn’t because they don’t trust Gordon and he’s not that good. And he wasn’t as efficient with his extra touches that they gave him as a vet courtesy.
quote:
I question how long they let it go on, especially with Murray also lurking
He said Murray is a non factor.
This post was edited on 10/7/22 at 8:06 pm
Page 7 of 10
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News