- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Trade offered: Evans for Jacobs
Posted on 8/31/22 at 5:18 pm
Posted on 8/31/22 at 5:18 pm
10 team standard league. I would get Evans. My team now:
Herbert
Zeke, Ekeler, Jacobs, Etienne, Mattison
Diggs, Dionte Johnson, Juju, Devonta Smith, Lockett, Garrett Wilson
Ertz, Knox
The other franchise is in HUGE need of a RB and my WRs aren't great. It would make my starting lineup better, but that's assuming Etienne isn't vultured by Robinson and that Jacobs does well. Should I?
Herbert
Zeke, Ekeler, Jacobs, Etienne, Mattison
Diggs, Dionte Johnson, Juju, Devonta Smith, Lockett, Garrett Wilson
Ertz, Knox
The other franchise is in HUGE need of a RB and my WRs aren't great. It would make my starting lineup better, but that's assuming Etienne isn't vultured by Robinson and that Jacobs does well. Should I?
Posted on 8/31/22 at 5:27 pm to Yesca11
You would be leaving yourself thin at RB which is a volition position. Mattison is only good if (when) Cook goes down but as soon as Cook is healthy , he is back to bench.
Zeke will lose touches to Pollard. Ekeler gets injured. Etienne won’t be a full workload back when Robinson is healthy.
Zeke will lose touches to Pollard. Ekeler gets injured. Etienne won’t be a full workload back when Robinson is healthy.
Posted on 8/31/22 at 5:34 pm to MasterKnight
Lol. Come on baw. This is a smash accept whether he’d be “thin” at RB or not. Especially in a 10 team league where waivers will have useful guys every week
Hell, if you’re terrified of only having 4 RBs or whatever, just trade Jacobs for Evans and then flip Evans for a better RB than Jacobs
Hell, if you’re terrified of only having 4 RBs or whatever, just trade Jacobs for Evans and then flip Evans for a better RB than Jacobs
Posted on 8/31/22 at 5:38 pm to MasterKnight
quote:
You would be leaving yourself thin at RB which is a volition position.
I have this exact same thought process, no matter how deep I am at RB. RB is a very difficult thing to get out of me most of the time.
Posted on 8/31/22 at 6:09 pm to Yesca11
Pick up Zamir White and make the deal if he is available.
The cut Drake because White is there.
The cut Drake because White is there.
Posted on 8/31/22 at 6:54 pm to Blutarsky
Didn’t see he wants Mattison too. Is that enough to be a deal breaker?
Posted on 8/31/22 at 6:57 pm to MasterKnight
quote:
You would be leaving yourself thin at RB which is a volition position. Mattison is only good if (when) Cook goes down but as soon as Cook is healthy , he is back to bench.
Zeke will lose touches to Pollard. Ekeler gets injured. Etienne won’t be a full workload back when Robinson is healthy.
Everything you’re saying applies to Jacobs right now as well. All indications and reports are that LV will be a RBBC.
Evans is the best player in the trade by a decent margin. OP, you should always take the best player in the trade.
This post was edited on 8/31/22 at 7:03 pm
Posted on 8/31/22 at 7:44 pm to Yesca11
Evans is hurt too much for a RB1 so what other WR does he have or try to send Etienne instead
Posted on 8/31/22 at 7:46 pm to grich31
quote:
Evans is hurt too much for a RB1 so what other WR does he have or try to send Etienne instead
Well, Jacobs isn’t a RB1.
The guy is being offered a low end WR1 for a low end RB2, who’s his 3rd RB.
What am I missing here?
ETA: Apparently I missed you claiming a player who has missed 7 games in 8 seasons is “hurt too much”.
What a dumb statement.
This post was edited on 9/1/22 at 12:21 am
Posted on 8/31/22 at 8:09 pm to RB10
The question is, “is Etienne gonna be that good?” Also, “is Zeke gonna be worth a damn?”
Also, Jacobs numbers weren’t stellar last season, but they were decent.
Also, Jacobs numbers weren’t stellar last season, but they were decent.
This post was edited on 8/31/22 at 8:10 pm
Posted on 8/31/22 at 8:18 pm to Yesca11
quote:
The question is, “is Etienne gonna be that good?” Also, “is Zeke gonna be worth a damn?”
Also, Jacobs numbers weren’t stellar last season, but they were decent.
Let’s say all three end up mid range RB2s. One of them is going to be sitting on your bench no matter what. Meanwhile, Evans would be an every week start.
You’re overthinking this.
Posted on 8/31/22 at 10:12 pm to Yesca11
We all would have laughed at someone for picking Jacobs over Evans. Take the trade.
Posted on 8/31/22 at 10:51 pm to Yesca11
You’re getting a trade offer of a 2nd/3rd rounder for a 5th rounder when no meaningful news has happened since your draft. Take the damn gift lol
Posted on 8/31/22 at 11:33 pm to RB10
Missing Evans Injury history but go for it
Posted on 9/1/22 at 12:11 am to grich31
quote:
Missing Evans Injury history but go for it
Wtf does this even mean? You do realize Jacobs has missed more games than Evans has the last two years, right?
ETA: I went back and looked. Jacobs has missed 6 games through 3 seasons. Evans has missed 7 games his entire career (8 seasons). So, seriously, what the frick are you even talking about?
This post was edited on 9/1/22 at 12:20 am
Posted on 9/1/22 at 7:49 am to RB10
The Raiders obviously don't want Jacobs ... why should you?
Posted on 9/1/22 at 9:09 am to Yesca11
Yeah take that. Easy call there. Jacobs is asscheeks.
Posted on 9/2/22 at 10:32 am to Yesca11
Accept this trade IMMEDIATELY.
Evans is a lot better and like someone said earlier if you're worried about RB, you can trade Evans for someone better than Jacobs.
Evans is a lot better and like someone said earlier if you're worried about RB, you can trade Evans for someone better than Jacobs.
Posted on 9/2/22 at 11:46 am to Yesca11
I’d accept immediately especially considering Jacobs is in position that is vulnerable
Popular
Back to top


10








