- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Vetoed Trade - need some input
Posted on 10/9/19 at 6:55 pm to hollywoodhead
Posted on 10/9/19 at 6:55 pm to hollywoodhead
quote:
but it makes a strong team even stronger and it affords the lesser team to at least field a lineup of relevant starters.
So this is reason to veto? Lord
0
Posted on 10/9/19 at 7:36 pm to hollywoodhead
Trade should stand. Sounds like a league of plebs
Posted on 10/9/19 at 7:49 pm to Mr. Hangover
Lol reread my posts. I'm not the OP and I didn't say I would veto it. Just analyzing why I think it's lopsided
Posted on 10/9/19 at 8:01 pm to hollywoodhead
quote:
Their argument is that it makes both teams better which it technically does but it makes a strong team even stronger and it affords the lesser team to at least field a lineup of relevant starters.
what the frick do you think is the point of trading?
Posted on 10/9/19 at 9:06 pm to hollywoodhead
It’s not collision, should not be vetoed at all, but it is chickenshit. Lindsay isnt a no.1. He’s barely a no.2. He’a getting out-touched, out-snapped, and out-targetted by Freeman. Hopkins will progress back to his mean. It’s only Wk 6. How do some of these things even get proposed?
Posted on 10/9/19 at 9:17 pm to dnm3305
quote:Lindsay has 15 more touches
He’a getting out-touched
quote:Yep, mainly because he's not good in pass pro. But even then you're talking 52% vs 51%, or a 4-snaps difference.
out-snapped
quote:Nah, he has two more targets. pretty even there.
and out-targetted
You could have made your point without being wrong
Posted on 10/9/19 at 9:25 pm to hollywoodhead
I took over as commish in our league this year. Unless their is clear collusion I will not allow the league to veto a trade just because a team will get better.
Trade vetos are for baby back bitches.
Trade vetos are for baby back bitches.
Posted on 10/9/19 at 10:32 pm to dnm3305
quote:
He’a getting out-touched, out-snapped, and out-targetted by Freeman
Posted on 10/9/19 at 11:42 pm to castorinho
Damn, I was frickin off on all of those. I looked at the box score a few days ago but evidently not close enough. Still think he’s not aa no.2, much less a no.1. Still a ridiculous trade from the OP. Seems likes its gonna be a split with Freeman all year.
Posted on 10/10/19 at 12:23 am to hollywoodhead
quote:
makes both teams better which it technically does
Done.
Also, if somebody wanted Hopkins, why didn't they offer a better trade?
This post was edited on 10/10/19 at 12:30 am
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News