Domain: tiger-web1.srvr.media3.us PC Discussion - Gaming, Performance and Enthusiasts | Page 1912 | Gaming Board
Started By
Message

re: PC Discussion - Gaming, Performance and Enthusiasts

Posted on 1/9/26 at 10:50 am to
Posted by Scruffy
Kansas City
Member since Jul 2011
77077 posts
Posted on 1/9/26 at 10:50 am to
Nice! Thanks.
Posted by SpeedyNacho
Member since May 2014
2578 posts
Posted on 1/11/26 at 6:24 am to
What about Monitors. I'll be building a monster of a PC next gen. Wanna get a nice 2k oled for competitive fps gaming.

someone was telling me something about the difference between 27 vs 32 inch and something I needed to steer clear for on 2k, it was either the 27 or the 32 inch.


help me, im lost and drunk.
Posted by Joshjrn
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2008
32621 posts
Posted on 1/11/26 at 7:41 am to
If I had to guess, I would say they are conveying one of two things:

1. 32” is too big for 1440p resolution and will look bad (which is false)
2. 32” is physically too large for a twitchy competitive game because you can’t see the entire screen at once (probably true)

But twitchy competitive games aren’t my jam, so I’ll defer to others.
Posted by SpeedyNacho
Member since May 2014
2578 posts
Posted on 1/12/26 at 7:18 pm to
Im pretty sure its 1.

I remember it specifically being 27' because 32' at 1440 was worse. But I just couldnt remember what it was and was curious. Thanks
Posted by Joshjrn
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2008
32621 posts
Posted on 1/12/26 at 9:49 pm to
quote:

Im pretty sure its 1.

I remember it specifically being 27' because 32' at 1440 was worse. But I just couldnt remember what it was and was curious. Thanks


I'm typing this on a 34" 3440x1440 monitor; ignore them.
Posted by SaintEB
Member since Jul 2008
23641 posts
Posted on 1/14/26 at 1:41 pm to
quote:

I remember it specifically being 27' because 32' at 1440 was worse. But I just couldnt remember what it was and was curious. Thanks




I don't play FPS in a competitive nature, but I do play them. I have gotten used to my 32" but you do have to slight turn your head. I'm not good, so take it for what its worth. But the damn thing looks glorious at 1440p.
Posted by SaintEB
Member since Jul 2008
23641 posts
Posted on 1/14/26 at 1:43 pm to
quote:

PCPartPicker Part List: LINK

CPU: AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D 4.7 GHz 8-Core Processor ($469.00 @ Amazon)
CPU Cooler: ARCTIC Liquid Freezer III Pro 360 77 CFM Liquid CPU Cooler ($89.99 @ Amazon)
Motherboard: MSI PRO X870-P WIFI ATX AM5 Motherboard ($206.00 @ Amazon)
Memory: Crucial Pro Overclocking 32 GB (2 x 16 GB) DDR5-6000 CL36 Memory ($273.99 @ Best Buy)
Storage: Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB M.2-2280 PCIe 4.0 X4 NVME Solid State Drive ($229.99 @ Best Buy)
Video Card: MSI VENTUS 3X OC GeForce RTX 5070 Ti 16 GB Video Card ($829.99 @ Amazon)
Case: Lian Li Lancool 207 ATX Mid Tower Case ($82.99 @ Amazon)
Power Supply: Corsair RM1000x (2024) 1000 W Fully Modular ATX Power Supply ($169.99 @ Best Buy)
Total: $2351.94
Prices include shipping, taxes, and discounts when available
Generated by PCPartPicker 2026-01-09 11:43 EST-0500



Nice build. Gun to my head I would have guessed something like this would have crept up closer to $3K. However, I think there may be some room to wiggle down a bit at the NVME and the PSU. With that said, we aren't talking budget saving number here, but just a bit of wiggle.
Posted by Joshjrn
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2008
32621 posts
Posted on 1/15/26 at 8:06 am to
quote:

However, I think there may be some room to wiggle down a bit at the NVME and the PSU. With that said, we aren't talking budget saving number here, but just a bit of wiggle.

No doubt. With that said, when I do rough draft proof of concept builds, I tend to go higher end on secondary components so that way I don’t have people “well actually…” me over $50
Posted by LSUGent
Member since Jun 2011
3262 posts
Posted on 3/16/26 at 4:54 pm to
I considered making a specific thread for this, but the DLSS preview by digital foundry is absolutely insane.



What it does to characters faces is going to cause a lot of debate about whether this technology is destroying the artistic intent of the devs, but how it’s manipulating lighting in realtime is just nuts.
Posted by Joshjrn
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2008
32621 posts
Posted on 3/16/26 at 6:00 pm to
I'm torn on it. On the one hand, there are situations in which it obviously improves upon what was there. There are other situations in which it fundamentally changes what's there. I think my issue is that this is clearly Nvidia's way of "improving performance" without actually improving hardware, while potentially trampling on the vision of the people making the games.

If I had to give a kneejerk reaction now, I'm not a fan. But I'll hold my pitchfork until they actually release it.
Posted by LSUGent
Member since Jun 2011
3262 posts
Posted on 3/16/26 at 6:48 pm to
quote:

But I'll hold my pitchfork until they actually release it.


The biggest aspect to me would be, being able to simulate path traced lighting using AI, then all of a sudden, even low end cards could have the benefit of insanely realistic lighting, and maybe even less die space dedicated to RT cores and more space on the die for raster/AI capabilities.
Posted by bad93ex
Walnut Cove
Member since Sep 2018
35813 posts
Posted on 3/22/26 at 10:58 am to
Red Dead Redemption 2 is on sale through Steam for $14.99, been waiting on this one
Posted by GoGators1995
Member since Jan 2023
7553 posts
Posted on 4/11/26 at 11:12 am to
Microcenter is bundling Ryzen 5000 with B550 mobos and DDR4 now in 2026. What a time to be alive.
Jump to page
Page First 1910 1911 1912
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 1912 of 1912Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram