Domain: tiger-web1.srvr.media3.us anyone else think | LSU Recruiting
Started By
Message
locked post

anyone else think

Posted on 3/11/09 at 5:22 pm
Posted by dranknpurple
austin
Member since Nov 2007
2181 posts
Posted on 3/11/09 at 5:22 pm
lache's a little overrated at #2? I don't think he has the build or lateral movement to be up that high. five star, but high teens, low twenties?
Posted by Cornholio
LaPlace
Member since Nov 2007
8268 posts
Posted on 3/11/09 at 5:23 pm to
No, not overrated. End of thread.
This post was edited on 3/11/09 at 5:24 pm
Posted by geauxtigers28
Gadsden, Alabama
Member since Dec 2008
1401 posts
Posted on 3/11/09 at 5:29 pm to
watch his film and look at his offer list, them come back and tell me if you still think he is overrated
Posted by eyeran
New Orleans
Member since Dec 2007
22201 posts
Posted on 3/11/09 at 5:31 pm to
quote:

lache's a little overrated at #2?

You must be scared he's not going to UT
Posted by NorfolkVATiger
Guam
Member since Nov 2005
2786 posts
Posted on 3/11/09 at 5:37 pm to
Actually, I've never gotten the hype about him even after watching his film. He looks good but not necessarily 5-star good to me.

He's got plenty of offers, so obviously he's a top player...I just don't get the internet mania about him.
Posted by sabanfan2010
New Orleans
Member since Dec 2008
52 posts
Posted on 3/11/09 at 5:44 pm to
if you've seen the kids highlight tape, you would know he is not overrated. the kid is a work horse on the field. He's a reggie bush type back that you want in space such as on screens and dump offs. Lache is the perfect back for whatg we are trying to do with our spread offense. The athletes are all coming into place here at LSU and we will be a force to reckon with for the next 4 years IMHO. No, he is not the in between tackle runner. but thats what we got Michael Ford for. If Lache comes here, i see him and ford being Thunder and Lightning©. And of course Ridley will be a man amongst boys on the fields.
Posted by Books
BR
Member since Jun 2005
11174 posts
Posted on 3/11/09 at 6:03 pm to
He's a top 5 talent imo, so no. Just about all the film is from his Soph year, and I don't see anything lacking in lateral movement. He's got speed, explosiveness, and burst better than anyone in this class by a good bit.
This post was edited on 3/11/09 at 6:05 pm
Posted by sugatowng
Look at my bling Bitches
Member since Nov 2006
25595 posts
Posted on 3/11/09 at 6:05 pm to
There is a poll on the Main Rivals board for the #1 spot...As good as LS is I think many believe Dyer and Lattimore are better...

I'd say he is the #3 RB on the board IMO
This post was edited on 3/11/09 at 6:07 pm
Posted by Books
BR
Member since Jun 2005
11174 posts
Posted on 3/11/09 at 6:08 pm to
quote:

There is a poll on the Main Rivals board for the #1 spot...As good as LS is I think many believe Dyer and Lattimore are better
You really using that as an argument when there's several links on the Ark board asking Ark fans to vote in that poll for Dyer? GTFO

Dyer's got an argument, Lattimore is overrated
This post was edited on 3/11/09 at 6:10 pm
Posted by sugatowng
Look at my bling Bitches
Member since Nov 2006
25595 posts
Posted on 3/11/09 at 6:11 pm to
quote:

You really using that as an argument when there's several links on the Ark board asking Ark fans to vote in that poll for Dyer? GTFO


No not completely...I'm also looking at comments from those not tied to the Arky program and from posts I've seen over the last few months concerning this group.

Posted by Books
BR
Member since Jun 2005
11174 posts
Posted on 3/11/09 at 6:23 pm to
quote:

...I'm also looking at comments from those not tied to the Arky program and from posts I've seen over the last few months concerning this group.
then you have selective reading, there's been just as many for LS as Dyer or Lattimore.
Posted by Charlie Scene
Hollywood Undead
Member since Jan 2009
1004 posts
Posted on 3/11/09 at 6:26 pm to
Seastrunk is a complete beast that would suceed in any offense.
Posted by sugatowng
Look at my bling Bitches
Member since Nov 2006
25595 posts
Posted on 3/11/09 at 6:34 pm to
quote:

then you have selective reading, there's been just as many for LS as Dyer or Lattimore.


I'll agree that most say LS has got more speed than both of these guys...Dyer and Lattimore are more complete backs IMO
Posted by Texaswill
North Carolina
Member since Jul 2008
613 posts
Posted on 3/11/09 at 6:39 pm to
quote:

lache's a little overrated at #2? I don't think he has the build or lateral movement to be up that high. five star, but high teens, low twenties?


No.
Posted by Born to be a Tiger
Somewhere lost in Texas
Member since Jan 2008
2741 posts
Posted on 3/11/09 at 7:01 pm to
quote:

He's a top 5 talent imo, so no. Just about all the film is from his Soph year, and I don't see anything lacking in lateral movement. He's got speed, explosiveness, and burst better than anyone in this class by a good bit.


I have to agree with you on that statment. I know it might be the first time we both agree on the same thing. The question out there is, how good is ML really? We know what ML can do with a great team in front of him. The question about MD is will he have 100,000 carries before he gets to college? We know what he can do against Ark. high school competition. The question about LS is what can he do when he gets on a team that will play him correctly? We already know what he can do against the Texas 5A schools with a line in front of him that only had one All District player. LS has more up side than any of the running backs in this class. IMO, Nick Parker is the most complete RB in this class and should be ranked over everyone.


Posted by bmy
Nashville
Member since Oct 2007
48203 posts
Posted on 3/11/09 at 7:10 pm to
Seastrunk has incredible balance and I don't think he'll struggle after adding on some mass.
Posted by dranknpurple
austin
Member since Nov 2007
2181 posts
Posted on 3/11/09 at 8:11 pm to
quote:

if you've seen the kids highlight tape, you would know he is not overrated. the kid is a work horse on the field. He's a reggie bush type back that you want in space such as on screens and dump offs.


I have seen it, like six months ago when they put it on youtube. I don't see any lateral moves comparable to reggie bush - he's straight line speed with decent movement

quote:

Lache is the perfect back for whatg we are trying to do with our spread offense. The athletes are all coming into place here at LSU and we will be a force to reckon with for the next 4 years

oh joy. what does this have to do with him being #2 in the country? a 190# gamechanger equal to RR, daquan bowers, JM, andre smith, etc? I disagree.
Posted by rtbtiger
Member since Jan 2009
842 posts
Posted on 3/11/09 at 9:08 pm to
chooses texas... yes over rated

chooses LSU... hell no, not over rated

This post was edited on 3/11/09 at 9:09 pm
Posted by Mmorsey
Member since Jan 2008
605 posts
Posted on 3/11/09 at 11:16 pm to
Lattimore is overated
Posted by GeauxTigrs1
Member since Apr 2008
1976 posts
Posted on 3/11/09 at 11:57 pm to
quote:

or lateral movement

quote:

I don't see any lateral moves


Watch about the 40 to 45 sec mark...what more do you want?!
LINK
This post was edited on 3/11/09 at 11:59 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram