- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 12/22/17 at 4:31 pm to MakeMoney
I don't know how to look at this. If he was a four year kid I wouldn't really care. But LSU may have gotten the BPA at a position of need. Idk. We couldn't go into next season with the same guys we had this year.
Posted on 12/22/17 at 4:33 pm to CP3forMVP
We will get one year of starting out of him. There are players that take up 5 years of scholarship that we don't get a year of starting out of.
This is not a big deal.
This is not a big deal.
Posted on 12/22/17 at 4:33 pm to Bjorn Cyborg
Sooooo this leaves us with four (4).
How many grayshirts can we take?
I'm thinking if we can take 2 as in the past, then Mike Williams is certainly one. He'll need a year anyhow to get into playing shape.
Who would be the other?
How many grayshirts can we take?
I'm thinking if we can take 2 as in the past, then Mike Williams is certainly one. He'll need a year anyhow to get into playing shape.
Who would be the other?
Posted on 12/22/17 at 4:34 pm to Salviati
quote:
So what?
Why does that matter?
Hmmmm. Let's see. Maybe that we only have 4 scholarships left to give out? Not including Ardarious Washington
Posted on 12/22/17 at 4:34 pm to CP3forMVP
So if nothing can be done and the K does count, how many spots are left?
And the two kickers we had may have been just fine if they had a position coach, which they will next year!
And the two kickers we had may have been just fine if they had a position coach, which they will next year!
Posted on 12/22/17 at 4:35 pm to tigerskin
Posted on 12/22/17 at 4:37 pm to Sampson
If this is true.... we will lose Chase, Watkins, Foster, or another highly rated recruit... this is a screw up. 
Posted on 12/22/17 at 4:38 pm to Bjorn Cyborg
quote:
We will get one year of starting out of him. There are players that take up 5 years of scholarship that we don't get a year of starting out of. This is not a big deal.
I agree with you. I tend to trust the staff and their evaluations.
I would also disagree with the people criticizing this move saying "now you have to use a scholly on a kicker two years in a row." Not necessarily, you still have Culp and Gonsoulin. One of those (or both) may stick.
Posted on 12/22/17 at 4:39 pm to Moonlight
And we only get him for one year?!?! Why would they do this and burn a spot???
Posted on 12/22/17 at 4:40 pm to Bottom9
quote:Reading is fundamental.quote:Hmmmm. Let's see. Maybe that we only have 4 scholarships left to give out? Not including Ardarious Washington
So what?
Why does that matter?
I didn't question the signing. I questioned why he thinks it matters that the kids has only one year of eligibility.
The 85 scholly maximum is a big limiter too, and this kid will drop off after next year.
Looks like a good pick up.
Posted on 12/22/17 at 4:41 pm to phi1514
Not having a great kicker could legit lose a game (or two) for us next year. Signing a 5th WR will not be the difference in winning or losing next year.
Posted on 12/22/17 at 4:42 pm to Moonlight
I think this means we finish with either:
Surtain, Goodrich, Joseph and Joiner
-OR-
Surtain, Goodrich, Joseph and Chase
I want both Joiner and Chase, but it sucks we can't have them both. I definitely want Goodrich, though.
Surtain, Goodrich, Joseph and Joiner
-OR-
Surtain, Goodrich, Joseph and Chase
I want both Joiner and Chase, but it sucks we can't have them both. I definitely want Goodrich, though.
Posted on 12/22/17 at 4:44 pm to Bjorn Cyborg
quote:
Not having a great kicker could legit lose a game (or two) for us next year
It did cost us the Troy game this year, didn't it?
Posted on 12/22/17 at 4:48 pm to TigersFan64
Any waivers that the coaches can apply for? Wonder how long it would take to get an answer. He’s a grad transfer. It really shouldn’t be this hard.
Posted on 12/22/17 at 4:48 pm to TigersFan64
I think Florida wished it had a kicker that could make all of his PATs.
Posted on 12/22/17 at 4:57 pm to Salviati
Yeah...I don't understand why he had to sign and be a part of the class at this time.
What if he wanted to come aboard next summer...well after after signing day...as a grad transfer?
Is the NCAA not going to allow him to transfer as a graduate because LSU had a 25 man signing class months earlier?
I've never heard of graduate transfers doing formal signings like he did.
What if he wanted to come aboard next summer...well after after signing day...as a grad transfer?
Is the NCAA not going to allow him to transfer as a graduate because LSU had a 25 man signing class months earlier?
I've never heard of graduate transfers doing formal signings like he did.
Posted on 12/22/17 at 4:59 pm to Salviati
Yep 
I loved that game.
I loved that game.
Posted on 12/22/17 at 4:59 pm to tigerskin
It's not a SEC matter, it's an NCAA matter, so what does the SEC office have to do with it. Is there a link somewhere that states this for a fact, or just someone's interpretation of the new signing rules? 
Posted on 12/22/17 at 5:01 pm to Game2620
Good question, I don't know. It'd be great if they could find some way, though...
Page 2 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News