- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Are Miles supporters delusional?
Posted on 12/13/09 at 9:50 pm to peopleschamp
Posted on 12/13/09 at 9:50 pm to peopleschamp
quote:
peopleschamp
peopleschump...there ya go, fixed it.
you are a fricking quitter...but of course, you all ready knew that. the dictionary defines 'delusional' as "not understanding what an accomplishment 51-14 really is. gfy...repeatedly.
Posted on 12/13/09 at 9:51 pm to Ipreciateu2
quote:
Ipreciateu2
quote:
Kiss my stanky arse, dude.
How are you people even able to walk upright? The dumbing down of America. Sickening.
Posted on 12/13/09 at 9:52 pm to byubengalboy
quote:
the dictionary defines 'delusional' as "not understanding what an accomplishment 51-14 really is. gfy...repeatedly.
See above.
Posted on 12/13/09 at 9:58 pm to peopleschamp
2004 with Saban
Final Record 9-3
Get blow out by UGA
Almost lost to Troy
Capital One Bowl
2009 with Miles
Current Record 9-3
Never blown out, but Ole Miss loss was just as embarressing
Almost lost to La Tech
Capital One Bowl
I'm not seeing a huge difference here, yet Saban is worshiped like a god and Miles is on the hot seat.
Final Record 9-3
Get blow out by UGA
Almost lost to Troy
Capital One Bowl
2009 with Miles
Current Record 9-3
Never blown out, but Ole Miss loss was just as embarressing
Almost lost to La Tech
Capital One Bowl
I'm not seeing a huge difference here, yet Saban is worshiped like a god and Miles is on the hot seat.
This post was edited on 12/13/09 at 10:02 pm
Posted on 12/13/09 at 10:05 pm to Jason9782003
1998-1999: 3-13
1999-2000: 6-10
2000-2001: 10-6
2001-2002: 11-5
2002-2003: 12-4
2003-2004: 13-3
2004-2005: 13-3
2005-2006: 13-3
2006-2007: 12-4
2007-2008: 9-7
2008-2009: 8-8
1999-2000: 6-10
2000-2001: 10-6
2001-2002: 11-5
2002-2003: 12-4
2003-2004: 13-3
2004-2005: 13-3
2005-2006: 13-3
2006-2007: 12-4
2007-2008: 9-7
2008-2009: 8-8
Posted on 12/13/09 at 10:15 pm to drizztiger
please detail the statistical significance of analyzing a 2 year moving average of conference results over a 12 year period...thanks
Posted on 12/13/09 at 10:29 pm to ForeLSU
Ignore, I mean analyze, how you prefer. The problem with you idiots is that you want to argue the data, which only proves you are clueless. Here's expanding through DiNardo's full tenure for you to argue.
1995-1996: 10-5-1
1996-1997: 12-4
1997-1998: 8-8
1998-1999: 3-13
1999-2000: 6-10
2000-2001: 10-6
2001-2002: 11-5
2002-2003: 12-4
2003-2004: 13-3
2004-2005: 13-3
2005-2006: 13-3
2006-2007: 12-4
2007-2008: 9-7
2008-2009: 8-8
1995-1996: 10-5-1
1996-1997: 12-4
1997-1998: 8-8
1998-1999: 3-13
1999-2000: 6-10
2000-2001: 10-6
2001-2002: 11-5
2002-2003: 12-4
2003-2004: 13-3
2004-2005: 13-3
2005-2006: 13-3
2006-2007: 12-4
2007-2008: 9-7
2008-2009: 8-8
Posted on 12/13/09 at 10:34 pm to drizztiger
quote:
The problem with you idiots is that you want to argue the data, which only proves you are clueless.
you're the idiot arguing data...
Posted on 12/13/09 at 10:40 pm to ForeLSU
quote:
you're the idiot arguing data...
No, you're the idiot arguing data.
I provided data which isn't the argument.
The argument is the analysis of the data.
Which again shows why you fricking idiots are clueless. I really never bought into the idea that America was truly getting dumber until the last 10 years. The internet has given every moron a voice to spout his uneducated and unintelligent thoughts. I hold nothing against honest labor, but guys like you should just stick to picking up the trash.
Posted on 12/13/09 at 10:45 pm to drizztiger
quote:
The argument is the analysis of the data.
so why is the analysis of a 2 year moving average over a 12 year period any more valid than a comparison of 09 vs 05, or the analysis of a comparison of 09 improvements over 08, or the analysis of a 3 year moving average after a coaching change over the last 4 changes, or the statistical insignificance of the 08 season???
Posted on 12/13/09 at 11:08 pm to freakazoid
quote:
All 3 losses we were in the game at the end.
Uh...no...Florida had us beat pretty early. They drove the field and sat on the ball, instead of scoring, with a 10 point lead.
Posted on 12/13/09 at 11:31 pm to Jason9782003
quote:
I'm not seeing a huge difference here, yet Saban is worshiped like a god and Miles is on the hot seat.
That's cause there isn't a huge difference or hardly any difference at all.
Nick 5 yrs 28-12 in the SEC
Les 5 yrs 27-13
Nick 1 nat. title and Les 1 nat. title
Nick 2 west titles and Les 2 west titles
Nick 2 SEC titles and Les 1
Nick 5 yr win total 48 and Les 51
Nick 3-2 in bowls and Les 4-0
Nick two 10 win seasons and Les 3
Nick worst record 8-5 and Les worst record 8-5
Nick's 5th yr record 9-3 and Les' 5th yr 9-3
Nick's 5 yrs here were very good yrs and Les' 5 yrs here have been very good yrs as well.
Posted on 12/13/09 at 11:46 pm to Lonnie4LSU
quote:
Nick's 5 yrs here were very good yrs and Les' 5 yrs here have been very good yrs as well.
Except, Saban took over a program that hadn't won at title in 50 years and was 3-8 the previous year being last place in the SEC West.
Miles came in coaching a team that was built for success, 2 years out from a National Title.
Posted on 12/14/09 at 12:21 am to theunknownknight
quote:
was 3-8 the previous year being last place in the SEC West.
I take nothing away from Nick. He is a very fine coach, but LSU had talent when Nick got here or he would never have been able to win 18 games in his 1st 2 yrs here. DiNardo had his problems at LSU but recruiting wasn't one of them.
And yes, Les had talent here when he got here as well.
If we want to give an edge to Nick cause he started the roll, ok....but let not hold Nick up as God and Les as bum.
Popular
Back to top

1






