- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Bolden may have to sit out
Posted on 7/30/12 at 7:06 pm to TigerStripes30
Posted on 7/30/12 at 7:06 pm to TigerStripes30
You guys are pussies and quitters!
if les has to prove his point in B'ham in 2014 he'll do it!
He just ran out of eligibility with JJ, that's all...
He'll prove it with Bolden!
(so, how may years will Bolden have?)
if les has to prove his point in B'ham in 2014 he'll do it!
He just ran out of eligibility with JJ, that's all...
He'll prove it with Bolden!
(so, how may years will Bolden have?)
2
Posted on 7/30/12 at 7:07 pm to nitwit
He will have 3 to play 2 But i think he wont be redshirted but this is if he comes in under sanctions if he comes in as regular transfer then he will only be eligible to play one year
This post was edited on 7/30/12 at 7:09 pm
Posted on 7/30/12 at 7:09 pm to southernelite
quote:
I really need to brush up on my eligibilty rules. I thought if the school granted their release they were eligible immediately
This. He was granted a release so he wouldn't have to sit out a year, but if this thread is true than we would have to count him against our 85 limit
Posted on 7/30/12 at 7:09 pm to TigerStripes30
quote:
Then u would rather them come in as a starter that hasnt played a down
Even if they're behind Mett and potentially Bolden that doesn't mean they won't play a down. Plus if Jennings or Rettig is better in two years than one of them could start.
Posted on 7/30/12 at 7:10 pm to whodidthat
We aren't at 85 though so we are clear there as well.
Posted on 7/30/12 at 7:10 pm to TigerStripes30
quote:
if so do we still take this guy?
Hell no
Posted on 7/30/12 at 7:13 pm to southernelite
quote:
I thought if the school granted their release they were eligible immediately
WowPosted on 7/30/12 at 7:14 pm to Broham
Posted on 7/30/12 at 7:14 pm to saintsfan22
Saints i do not understand your logic on this?....still they will need to start sometime
Posted on 7/30/12 at 7:16 pm to saintsfan22
quote:i believe this too.
Plus if Jennings or Rettig is better in two years than one of them could start.
Posted on 7/30/12 at 7:17 pm to JBeam
I agree with saints on that part jus do not understand the parts before
Posted on 7/30/12 at 7:18 pm to southernelite
You still have to sit out a year.
Posted on 7/30/12 at 7:18 pm to TigerStripes30
quote:quote:Well they gotta start sometime
That is more than our two back ups can say.
Rivers and Randall(the two backups he's referring to) may never start for LSU.
quote:
jus do not understand the parts before
The 3rd string QB can play without ever starting
This post was edited on 7/30/12 at 7:20 pm
Posted on 7/30/12 at 7:20 pm to whodidthat
quote:
This. He was granted a release so he wouldn't have to sit out a year
A release only means they can receive a scholarship from the new school immediately. Immediate eligibility has to be granted by the NCAA, it is the exception...not the rule.
ETA: But there is no way the NCAA will require him to sit out.
This post was edited on 7/30/12 at 7:22 pm
Posted on 7/30/12 at 7:24 pm to TigerStripes30
Why do we want this guy? I have higher confidence in our current roster than a lackluster Big Ten QB.
Posted on 7/30/12 at 7:25 pm to saintsfan22
Gotcha now saints...guess when rettig and jennings comes in whoever has the best practices will decern all this
Posted on 7/30/12 at 7:25 pm to MOT
he wanted a release last season. But, Joe Pa blocked it.
Posted on 7/30/12 at 7:26 pm to Roll JaMarcus Roll
RMR- never said i wanted him cause im am def confident in our roster now as is and whats coming next year But i am on the fence about it all
This post was edited on 7/30/12 at 7:27 pm
Posted on 7/30/12 at 7:26 pm to JBeam
Seems to me we must have originally said no thanks but now figure we can get the NCAA to provide exception.
Posted on 7/30/12 at 7:30 pm to TigerStripes30
Some on this board are stressing way too much over this kid.
If the coaches think we need him, so be it. If they don't, so be it. There's no reason IMO for people to be bickering about a guy that will likely never play a snap at LSU either way. Let the coaches handle it...They know what they're doing, and they know what we need better than anyone.
Some of our fans can get worked up over very trivial things sometimes.
If the coaches think we need him, so be it. If they don't, so be it. There's no reason IMO for people to be bickering about a guy that will likely never play a snap at LSU either way. Let the coaches handle it...They know what they're doing, and they know what we need better than anyone.
Some of our fans can get worked up over very trivial things sometimes.
This post was edited on 7/30/12 at 7:31 pm
Page 2 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News