- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Coaches poll voters on crack
Posted on 11/14/10 at 1:56 pm to HAGENT1
Posted on 11/14/10 at 1:56 pm to HAGENT1
It ain't over yet. I tried to tell you guys they were never gonna let LSU touch the title game. They are gonna put a 1 loss conference leader/champion ahead of us. They will find somebody to jump us. I know the year is not done yet, but LSU is gonna be left out some kinda of way since we did not win our SEC West division let alone the conference. Our best bet at a BCS is auburn winning out.
Posted on 11/14/10 at 1:59 pm to apostel tiger
quote:
" Stuggled to score 51"!!! Wow, in my two years reading post on the rant this is the stupidest comment by far! Go kill your self!!!
Then you haven't been paying attention. I've said stupider shite.
And did you watch the game you dumb frick? Or read one of my other posts declaring the offense a struggle and giving props to the defense? Or do you always jump in this late after reading half the posts? Our offense sucked, struggles, ate arse, whatever. That was my point.
Posted on 11/14/10 at 2:00 pm to peopleschamp
quote:
It ain't over yet. I tried to tell you guys they were never gonna let LSU touch the title game. They are gonna put a 1 loss conference leader/champion ahead of us. They will find somebody to jump us. I know the year is not done yet, but LSU is gonna be left out some kinda of way since we did not win our SEC West division let alone the conference. Our best bet at a BCS is auburn winning out.
If we win out we'll be #3 or #4 when it's all said and done. A team that doesn't win its conference doesn't deserve to play for a NC. Bottom line.
Posted on 11/14/10 at 2:07 pm to chilge1
Struggled to score 51 points the week after beating the defending and hated National Champions in a meaning Top 10 matchup.
updated for accuracy
updated for accuracy
Posted on 11/14/10 at 2:45 pm to WelcomeToDeathValley
quote:
TCU and Boise had no right being ahead of Auburn in the 1st place, IMO voters just didnt buy that Auburn was THAT good.
You're contradicting yourself. The voters have every right to vote however they want.
Posted on 11/14/10 at 4:22 pm to DEG
quote:Wrong. Sometime tie breakers or unfortunate circumstances won't allow a better team to be conference champions. In 2003, OU was not a conference champion, but their resume was much better than 115 of 117 Div 1A teams, including the Sun Belt, CUSA, ACC, Big10, Big East, and yes, the Big12 and Pac10 champions. Neither conference champions mentioned had a better resume than OU that year. In other words, the team the AP voted #1 leading up to bowl games had a worse record, worse SOS, and worse MOV than OU. Not only that, OU's only loss came against a conference champion while the AP's #1 team lost to an unranked team. Why not have the TWO BEST play for the NC, regardless if they're conference champs or not?
If we win out we'll be #3 or #4 when it's all said and done. A team that doesn't win its conference doesn't deserve to play for a NC. Bottom line.
Posted on 11/14/10 at 5:05 pm to DEG
quote:
DEG
It's spelled GED. Let us all know when you get one.
Posted on 11/14/10 at 5:08 pm to DEG
quote:
Dude - they hung 83 points on a conference opponent. We struggled to score 51 on a directional school. How does it not makes sense to you?
i guessed Au struggled against them too. wow!
Posted on 11/14/10 at 5:48 pm to DEG
quote:
Dude - they hung 83 points on a conference opponent. We struggled to score 51 on a directional school. How does it not makes sense to you?
Dude - Wisconsin has only played three teams with a winning record and won two of those games. LSU has played 7 teams with a winning record and won 6 of them.
Posted on 11/14/10 at 6:13 pm to dmbear
quote:
Dude - Wisconsin has only played three teams with a winning record and won two of those games. LSU has played 7 teams with a winning record and won 6 of them.
and if LSU fans could do the voting LSU would be ahead of the Badgers. If I was a voter and saw how bad the QBs struggled to pass the ball and saw Wisconsin without their star RB route a big 10 who has played competitive with other big 10 teams this year I can't say I would have jumped LSU over Wisconsin.
Posted on 11/14/10 at 6:49 pm to jdlsu
Wisconsin did not jump LSU, they were ahead of last week as well.
Popular
Back to top

1






