- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 4/7/18 at 5:11 pm to Tigerbait357
This announcer really wants a 10... not happening with that bobble though. Still a great beam rotation.
Posted on 4/7/18 at 5:14 pm to CheerWhine
Nice rotation
Even with an off meet we scored over a 197.600 which is impressive
I will have to watch the other regionals to attest for their scores
Even with an off meet we scored over a 197.600 which is impressive
I will have to watch the other regionals to attest for their scores
Posted on 4/7/18 at 5:17 pm to Tigerbait357
Nebraskas highest score this year was 197.125?
Posted on 4/7/18 at 5:18 pm to Tigerbait357
I feel like those beam scores could have been a bit higher. Was very nice to see them hit beam. That’s the rotation we will start with at nationals. We need those sticks at nationals on vault. Floor was just odd. I was so scared for the ankles. So strange to see them all struggle with short last passes.
Posted on 4/7/18 at 5:19 pm to uway
Yes
Nebraska has been ridiculously overscored
Its funny how everyone is somehow scoring career highs in a post season meet where scores are suppose to be a little tighter.
All rotations are .10 to .20 higher than what they normally score
Bar scores have been really rough, lets see how they score on it
Nebraska has been ridiculously overscored
Its funny how everyone is somehow scoring career highs in a post season meet where scores are suppose to be a little tighter.
All rotations are .10 to .20 higher than what they normally score
Bar scores have been really rough, lets see how they score on it
This post was edited on 4/7/18 at 5:21 pm
Posted on 4/7/18 at 5:20 pm to Tigerbait357
quote:
Its funny how everyone is somehow scoring career highs in a post season meet where scores are suppose to be a little tighter.
Except LSU.
Posted on 4/7/18 at 5:21 pm to Tigerbait357
Do they limit the roster for postseason? I could have sworn I saw that tall Asian girl for LSU cheering in the stands.
Posted on 4/7/18 at 5:23 pm to uway
LSU were their open problems on floor. I can say it was pretty fair
On vault it was very fair it was an overall nice rotation with 3 9.9 scores
Some of the bar scores were questionable
Beam was pretty accurate for the most part, except for Desiderio. Should been higher, no clue where her deductions came from.
No one was over scored to me or blatantly that is
I thought for the most part LSU was fairly scored and deserved what they earned outside maybe two routines but every meet has a score or two that we don't agree with.
On vault it was very fair it was an overall nice rotation with 3 9.9 scores
Some of the bar scores were questionable
Beam was pretty accurate for the most part, except for Desiderio. Should been higher, no clue where her deductions came from.
No one was over scored to me or blatantly that is
I thought for the most part LSU was fairly scored and deserved what they earned outside maybe two routines but every meet has a score or two that we don't agree with.
This post was edited on 4/7/18 at 5:27 pm
Posted on 4/7/18 at 5:27 pm to Tigerbait357
I think LSU's scores were fair for the most part.
I don't know that Nebraska (or Bama in the SECs) were overscored. I just know they are scoring higher than they've scored all season, and that doesn't make a lot of sense. These things tend to average out. If anything, you would expect lower scores with tighter judging, given the increased scrutiny judges could expect to receive in this setting.
It feels like there's some gamesmanship going on, where the judges try to make things close. Of course that's just a feeling, based in not much.
I don't know that Nebraska (or Bama in the SECs) were overscored. I just know they are scoring higher than they've scored all season, and that doesn't make a lot of sense. These things tend to average out. If anything, you would expect lower scores with tighter judging, given the increased scrutiny judges could expect to receive in this setting.
It feels like there's some gamesmanship going on, where the judges try to make things close. Of course that's just a feeling, based in not much.
Posted on 4/7/18 at 5:30 pm to lsursb
Seems fair
Can't say much when I haven't seen their routines
OU on pace for 198
Can't say much when I haven't seen their routines
OU on pace for 198
Posted on 4/7/18 at 5:31 pm to Tigerbait357
Illinois and Michigan are not far behind Bama, a major mistake could hurt anyone at this point.
Posted on 4/7/18 at 5:32 pm to lsursb
quote:
Florida scored 197.725 at home.
Florida was not at home. They didn’t host.
Posted on 4/7/18 at 5:33 pm to Tigerbait357
Looks like Breen for Nebraska fell on bars.
Posted on 4/7/18 at 5:38 pm to irnfan
Looks like they’ll still grab 2nd spot.
Posted on 4/7/18 at 5:39 pm to lsufanz
I think the best they can get is a 197.625 at this point. Should be lower than that though.
Posted on 4/7/18 at 5:39 pm to Tigerbait357
This coverage is terrible! I don't even know why I bothered watching honestly. I mean I feel like I saw less than half of our athletes perform.
Posted on 4/7/18 at 5:41 pm to cajunsaint
And the announcers didn’t seem to understand the meet or the rules
Posted on 4/7/18 at 5:42 pm to allincontext
Did the announcer say Nebraska was in contention for first after they received their final score and clearly ended with a score lower than LSU?
Popular
Back to top


1





