- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 9/28/09 at 7:28 am to medtiger
quote:
Tyson Lee is most to blame...if he just pitches the ball we're 3-1.
But he didn't. If our deep snapper doesn't snap the ball to the 1 yard line, then MSU isn't even in the game. Works both ways....we gave them a free TD once, but not at the end when it counted most. Cheer your team for a job well done.
Posted on 9/28/09 at 7:33 am to Chicken
yes, lsu is 4-0. but the team has not looked good at all. i agree with the op that said lady luck. they can not continue to play this way and keep winning. there is no drop off in talent so there are problems on this team. just not getting the coaching they need.
Posted on 9/28/09 at 7:39 am to gmbdwbwcb
It is as simple as this. It ain't about 4-0 at all. It's easy to understand if you're see we're talking about Miss State. We're sitting here, and I'm supposed to be ok with performance, and we're talking about Miss State. I mean listen, we're sitting here talking about Miss State, not Bama, not Florida, not Georgia, but we're talking about Miss State. State, man!
Posted on 9/28/09 at 7:50 am to Jack Burton
quote:
It is as simple as this. It ain't about 4-0 at all. It's easy to understand if you're see we're talking about Miss State. We're sitting here, and I'm supposed to be ok with performance, and we're talking about Miss State. I mean listen, we're sitting here talking about Miss State, not Bama, not Florida, not Georgia, but we're talking about Miss State. State, man!
Teams change from year to year. That works both ways, you can't just complain and say "LSU isn't as good as they have been and we want them to be" and not accept the fact that poor teams can get better. Talking about a State team with a new staff. New staff means new energy around the program and a new style of offense. I mean, look how well that's worked for Washington this year. It was a game in Starkville, playing a team that has beaten them for the last 10 years. I'm confident everyone was pumped up for that game over at State. I am by no means saying this LSU team is perfect, but you must take everything into account.
Posted on 9/28/09 at 7:59 am to Sasquatch Smash
quote:
I am by no means saying this LSU team is perfect, but you must take everything into account.
I agree. But we, as fans, have been trying to rationalize and take everything into account for each game. At some point, we're going to have to quit making excuses. Hopefully, we can begin executing.
1) Washington--on the road, travel out west, late start time, field was wet
2) Vanderbilt-- field conditions
3) ULL-- it's their bowl game, field conditions... (did you see what Nebraska did to them?)
4) Mississippi State-- field conditions again, early start time (did you see what Auburn did to them?)
Posted on 9/28/09 at 8:00 am to Sasquatch Smash
I understand what you're saying, but here is something else to consider. Why can OU, Ohio State, USC, UF, etc compete year in and year out without significant performance drop-offs, yet I'm supposed to be ok with LSU playing poorly and "just getting by?"
This isn't 2001 when we were still a rebuilding program. The program is built! It is in place! Two BCS NC's, 3 SEC titles, bowl wins out the arse, and top 10 recruiting classes and I am supposed to be OK with the piss-poor play and execution that I have seen in 4 very lackluster games?? BULL. shite.
Talk all you want about other teams being allowed to get better, but even if State had made a big jump in coaching or talent, there is NO WAY that they should be anywhere near the level of LSU yet. NO WAY.
This isn't 2001 when we were still a rebuilding program. The program is built! It is in place! Two BCS NC's, 3 SEC titles, bowl wins out the arse, and top 10 recruiting classes and I am supposed to be OK with the piss-poor play and execution that I have seen in 4 very lackluster games?? BULL. shite.
Talk all you want about other teams being allowed to get better, but even if State had made a big jump in coaching or talent, there is NO WAY that they should be anywhere near the level of LSU yet. NO WAY.
Posted on 9/28/09 at 8:25 am to BlueCrab
quote:
I think you can blame whoever scheduled our first 4 games.
winner winner chicken dinner!!
Posted on 9/28/09 at 8:31 am to 7 Moves
quote:See this weeks Poll. They are right back in the thick of things.
I blame the Huskies for beating USC and knocking them probably out of the BCS again.
Posted on 9/28/09 at 8:55 am to Jack Burton
quote:OU, OSU, and USC all have a loss right now, four games into the season.
Why can OU, Ohio State, USC, UF, etc compete year in and year out without significant performance drop-offs, yet I'm supposed to be ok with LSU playing poorly and "just getting by?"
And we are rebuilding at the most important position in college football: QB. RP was supposed to be the guy this year. He's not here.
Posted on 9/28/09 at 8:58 am to Jack Burton
quote:
Why can OU, Ohio State, USC, UF, etc compete year in and year out without significant performance drop-offs, yet I'm supposed to be ok with LSU playing poorly and "just getting by?"
Well, I'm sure you can put a lot of that on the conferences those other teams play in, and none of those teams ever lose to inferior talent or struggle with them. As far as UF, I guess that 2007 season was a fluke for them and complete dominance is the norm. They never struggle with anyone, good call. Never hurts to have a quarterback stay with a team for four years.
Posted on 9/28/09 at 9:01 am to jlsutiger
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Is Miles to blame for the 4-0 start?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
And just as much as the year-before-that's 4-0 start!
Is Miles to blame for the 4-0 start?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
quote:
Just as much as last year's 4-0 start I guess.
And just as much as the year-before-that's 4-0 start!
Posted on 9/28/09 at 9:01 am to Chicken
You can blame our +7 best-in-the-nation turnover ratio. And if we keep it up we might be 5-0 next week.
Posted on 9/28/09 at 9:03 am to Chicken
Clever. Will you share the same sentiment when we are 4-4?
Posted on 9/28/09 at 9:04 am to Walt OReilly
Some people can't stand the truth. 
Popular
Back to top

0






