- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 9/8/19 at 6:11 pm to tLSU
quote:
Stupid to the point of scary.
You clearly see the ball touching the turf? I see shadows.
Posted on 9/8/19 at 6:17 pm to tLSU
quote:
while I understand the limitations of much of our fanbase
You are being kind sir. We have some dumbasses.
Posted on 9/8/19 at 6:18 pm to tLSU
quote:
And at 34:52, the ball actually bounces off of the turf. And again after hitting his arm.
I watched that replay on YouTube earlier. I believe the ball hit the ground, but I haven't seen a still image of it hitting the ground. I'm not sure why you're acting like an a-hole when the image is limited by shadows.
Posted on 9/8/19 at 6:20 pm to slackster
If ruled INt like it should have been live, I don’t see how it’s overturned
Posted on 9/8/19 at 6:21 pm to slackster
Every single image of a ball on the ground will have shadows under it, as the field is lit from above. The "shadow" is between the ball and the ground. It is not possible for the elbow to be cradling the ball beyond the point at which the elbow ends.
This is simply common sense. Every single referee on the planet would consider that "definitive" evidence.
This is simply common sense. Every single referee on the planet would consider that "definitive" evidence.
This post was edited on 9/8/19 at 6:22 pm
Posted on 9/8/19 at 6:21 pm to Chad504boy
quote:
If ruled INt like it should have been live, I don’t see how it’s overturned
The ball was OOB before anyone had possession.
Other than that, I agree. I think it hit the ground, but I don't see it touching the ground. The shadows make that impossible.
Posted on 9/8/19 at 6:24 pm to jrodLSUke
quote:
Photo proof that the UT WR had his elbow under the ball.
Under the tip of the ball, the ball is still on the ground.
Unless you're going to try and argue that his elbow under the tip kept the entire football suspended above the ground.
Posted on 9/8/19 at 6:25 pm to slackster
quote:
The ball was OOB before anyone had possession.
This is really all that matters.
Posted on 9/8/19 at 6:27 pm to tLSU
quote:
Every single image of a ball on the ground will have shadows under it, as the field is lit from above. The "shadow" is between the ball and the ground. It is not possible for the elbow to be cradling the ball beyond the point at which the elbow ends.
It seemed like Stingley had the ball pinned against the UT guy with his right hip, but like I said, I think it hits the ground.
As for the shadow, you know what I mean.
:max_bytes(150000):strip_icc()/GettyImages-488858872-resize-56a314d83df78cf7727bb793.jpg)
This ball is on the ground. The Stingley one is far more difficult to see.
Posted on 9/8/19 at 6:28 pm to notiger1997
quote:
This is really all that matters.
Yeah my beef with the play is it being ruled a UT catch on the field. That's an atrocious call. It was an INT or incomplete. In no way was it ever a UT completion.
Posted on 9/8/19 at 6:32 pm to slackster
quote:
It seemed like Stingley had the ball pinned against the UT guy with his right hip
Unless Stingley has a significant beer belly, he's completely over the ball and unable to pin it against anything but the ground.
Posted on 9/8/19 at 6:33 pm to rds dc
I never saw it definatively it the ground from the angle they showed on replay. To me it rolled around on the side of the receiver.
Posted on 9/8/19 at 6:33 pm to slackster
quote:
Yeah my beef with the play is it being ruled a UT catch on the field. That's an atrocious call. It was an INT or incomplete. In no way was it ever a UT completion.
I was about to lose my shite thinking that after the review they were going to somehow still give him a catch.
Posted on 9/8/19 at 6:33 pm to Chad504boy
Lol, you or anyone else is welcomed to show me better, please do actually. I made a post this morning same as OP so I went back and watched on YouTube on repeat and came away with this and screenshot it
Posted on 9/8/19 at 6:34 pm to tigerfoot
Inconclusive. Should have been ruled an interception. The reverse angle in my opinion showed his hand underneath the ball. I agree the refs blew the call and took the easy way out. There was a small amount of home cooking.
Posted on 9/8/19 at 6:34 pm to slackster
quote:
but I haven't seen a still image of it hitting the ground.
Surely you think the video shows this, though? The replay shows the ball, however slightly, bouncing off the turf.
Posted on 9/8/19 at 6:34 pm to clamdip
It hit the ground. I have watched it about 20 times. The angle is not until almost the end of the replays they were showing us
Page 4 of 9
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News