- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Keiland Problems?
Posted on 8/11/08 at 2:13 pm to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 8/11/08 at 2:13 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
should my grades be penalized b/c i didn't work in college and made As while there are plenty of people who busted arse to get Bs?
No. But that doesn't relate at all to what we are talking about.
quote:
i think it would tell the guys who are behind him to start working harder
Right. You dont think Keiland got the message?
quote:
that seriously happens all the time
without pulling strings, people get promoted because they generate business for firms.
9 times out of 10 the harder worker generates more money for whatever business they are in.
you have a lot to learn. I realize you are fresh at your job...maybe down the road you'll see what I am talking about.
quote:
if i had a company i'd promote the guy who was best for my company, which would almost assuredly be the guy who made my company the most money
which assuredly would be the guy who works the hardest.
1
Posted on 8/11/08 at 2:14 pm to The Egg
quote:
can we off this thread or something
ive been attempting to get that done for quite a while now
Posted on 8/11/08 at 2:14 pm to hashtag
there are hard workers who can make money
but there are a lot of hard workers who have the social intelligence/charm of a dead turtle and have no real promotion prospects
there are some fields that require both to really get ahead. sports/entertainment agents come to mind. hell most things involving the business side of sports and entertainment fall into this category
but there are a lot of hard workers who have the social intelligence/charm of a dead turtle and have no real promotion prospects
there are some fields that require both to really get ahead. sports/entertainment agents come to mind. hell most things involving the business side of sports and entertainment fall into this category
Posted on 8/11/08 at 2:15 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
but there are a lot of hard workers who have the social intelligence/charm of a dead turtle and have no real promotion prospects
Quit talking about Asians like that, Slow.
Posted on 8/11/08 at 2:15 pm to hashtag
misslou and Psycho, you all correct, I made a similar post and that's the problem. I am wrong and I did not make that post.
Posted on 8/11/08 at 2:20 pm to Stagg8
quote:whoa whoa, i'm a light-to-moderate worker with the charm of a rhinocerous so yeah
Quit talking about Asians like that, Slow.
Posted on 8/11/08 at 2:23 pm to The Egg
quote:
whoa whoa, i'm a light-to-moderate worker with the charm of a rhinocerous so yeah
Nice. But the question is Egg... do you bring your own food to work, cook it in the common microwave, and then does the smell linger in the break room for over an hour after you're done with it?
ETA: And I've had a bad enough day already to not worry about the 666 curse.
This post was edited on 8/11/08 at 2:24 pm
Posted on 8/11/08 at 2:24 pm to Stagg8
egg totally does that
Posted on 8/11/08 at 2:26 pm to Lester Earl
quote:
No. But that doesn't relate at all to what we are talking about.
you're right
let's say i'm going for a job against a person who works a lot harder than me but i have a better gpa, and i get the job. i don't think that's wrong, and that happens all the time
quote:
you have a lot to learn. I realize you are fresh at your job...maybe down the road you'll see what I am talking about.
i'm basing my knowledge off what a lot of corporate lawyers told me. many of whom are the guys who worked hard, didn't be promoted, and ended up quitting as a result. i'm actually not in that kind of position at the moment.
Posted on 8/11/08 at 2:26 pm to Maximus
i can smell egg's lunch from kirby street
Posted on 8/11/08 at 2:31 pm to SlowFlowPro
ok this is my whole point, but ill spell it out:
so 2 guys making the company the same amount of money
who should get the promotion first:
hard worker
half asser
so 2 guys making the company the same amount of money
who should get the promotion first:
hard worker
half asser
This post was edited on 8/11/08 at 2:31 pm
Posted on 8/11/08 at 2:32 pm to Lester Earl
quote:
so 2 guys making the company the same amount of money
who should get the promotion first:
hard worker
half asser
Does the half asser run a sub 4.4?
Posted on 8/11/08 at 2:32 pm to Lester Earl
in that situation, the hard worker
but i'm assuming that keiland will have the most net positive effect as a RB on the team. if he doesn't, then no, he doesn't deserve to start. and i've said that charles scott may be the guy to be the most positive back
but i strongly believe KW and Scott were our 2 best backs LAST year
but i'm assuming that keiland will have the most net positive effect as a RB on the team. if he doesn't, then no, he doesn't deserve to start. and i've said that charles scott may be the guy to be the most positive back
but i strongly believe KW and Scott were our 2 best backs LAST year
Posted on 8/11/08 at 2:34 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
but i strongly believe KW and Scott were our 2 best backs LAST year
no shite?
Posted on 8/11/08 at 2:58 pm to Stagg8
quote:
Does the half asser run a sub 4.4?
Trindon Holliday does. I wouldn't call him a half asser though.
Posted on 8/11/08 at 3:00 pm to Sammich
quote:
Trindon Holliday does. I wouldn't call him a half asser though.
My point being that KW likely will (if he doesn't already) run a sub 4.4.
Posted on 8/11/08 at 3:14 pm to Stagg8
quote:
My point being that KW likely will (if he doesn't already) run a sub 4.4.
Maybe.. Still the fact remains that both Scott & Holliday both have better yards per carry average than KW in both 2006 & 2007.
Posted on 8/11/08 at 3:20 pm to Sammich
quote:
Still the fact remains that both Scott & Holliday both have better yards per carry average than KW in both 2006 & 2007.
First off, Holliday is not a "runningback."
Secondly, KW has averaged 6.5 ypc over about 150 carries. Scott's sampling size is a good bit smaller (he has more than 50 fewer carries over that time if I remember correctly).
By your reasoning, Hester must have really sucked.
Posted on 8/11/08 at 3:27 pm to hashtag
quote:
where's the link that says KW doesn't know his assignments?
Go back about a hundred and fifty pages, someone quoted one of the coaches as saying that KW often ran to the wrong hole. Who thinks football requires a high IQ?
Since you mentioned intelligence, are you implying the lack of was the reason he went to Hargrave?
Posted on 8/11/08 at 3:28 pm to roygu
quote:
Since you mentioned intelligence, are you implying the lack of was the reason he went to Hargrave?
He went to Hargrave because of his age.
Page 34 of 37
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News