- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Lacy lawyer interview
Posted on 4/16/25 at 4:53 pm to Red Stick Tigress
Posted on 4/16/25 at 4:53 pm to Red Stick Tigress
Look what it also says
Look familiar?
quote:
As Lacy was illegally passing the other vehicles, the driver of a northbound pickup truck abruptly braked and swerved to the right to avoid a head-on collision with the approaching Dodge. Traveling behind the pickup was a 2017 Kia Cadenza whose driver swerved left to avoid the on coming Dodge Charger. As the Kia Cadenza took evasive action to avoid impact with the Dodge, it crossed the centerline and collided head-on with a southbound 2017 Kia Sorento.
Look familiar?
0
Posted on 4/16/25 at 4:56 pm to Red Stick Tigress
quote:
Are you a lip reader as you know what he "bragged" to his teammates?
LINK
Fast forward to :58 seconds into the video.
Watch it
Tell me if you need the ability to read lips to know wtf he’s doing
If your emotional self can’t handle the truth in these threads, you should probably avoid them
Posted on 4/16/25 at 4:57 pm to SammyTiger
quote:
The only way it’s his fault is if she would have hit him if she didn’t swerve into the other guy.
There’s a question of whether he would have been convicted, then there’s a question of whether he logically deserves blame.
Let’s say I walk out into the middle of the interstate and cause the first cars in line to lock up their brakes. There’s a 15-car pileup behind them and someone dies. Am I criminally responsible for that death? I don’t know, probably not. Did I cause the accident? Uhh… yeah.
Posted on 4/16/25 at 5:00 pm to lostinbr
quote:
and cause the first cars in line to lock up their brakes. There’s a 15-car pileup behind them and someone dies.
Those 15 cars should have just stopped.
-SammyTiger
Posted on 4/16/25 at 5:01 pm to lostinbr
how far behind someone are you supposed to drive?
The answer by law is far enough to stop in anal emergency.
if the car in front of you could stop and avoid an accident, that means there is enough time to stop safely and you weren’t doing what you needed to do.
and that’s rear end accidents.
it’s not swerving into oncoming traffic.
The answer by law is far enough to stop in anal emergency.
if the car in front of you could stop and avoid an accident, that means there is enough time to stop safely and you weren’t doing what you needed to do.
and that’s rear end accidents.
it’s not swerving into oncoming traffic.
Posted on 4/16/25 at 5:04 pm to Vacherie Saint
quote:
Because no one has ever reported that anyone stopped. Not one. Ever. You are driving right behind someone in traffic at 40ish MPH and they abruptly slam on their brakes and swerve half out of the lane. You are hitting something. Thousands of accidents go down like this every year.
thousands of accidents happen like that and it’s usually the fault of the person who could t stop safely.
not if you’re following at a safe distance.
I literally have slammed on my breaks going 60 on the interstate and avoided an accident.
Like I said, the impact with lacey has to be reasonably likely to happen to justify her taking evasive maneuvers that cause an accident.
and that doesn’t seem to be the case.
Posted on 4/16/25 at 5:04 pm to SammyTiger
quote:
anal emergency.
I think you are having one of those now friend.
Posted on 4/16/25 at 5:06 pm to Vacherie Saint
What would have happened if she didn’t swerve.
Posted on 4/16/25 at 5:08 pm to Ryan3232
U got it all wrong buddy on Kyren.
Posted on 4/16/25 at 5:09 pm to SammyTiger
In Louisiana you’d have to establish comparative fault to make that case. And that’s the grandaddy of all long shots. Even then, he’s not absolved of guilt.
Posted on 4/16/25 at 5:09 pm to SammyTiger
quote:
how far behind someone are you supposed to drive?
3-4 seconds and use a landmark to count one thousand one... one thousand two? etc. to brake safely
If I am driving faster I add more time to stop.
Posted on 4/16/25 at 5:09 pm to SammyTiger
She plows into the back of the truck
Posted on 4/16/25 at 5:10 pm to Ryan3232
quote:He wasn’t.
It was the first I heard that Kyren was wrongfully arrested.
quote:Make sure to find out from more than just the defense attorney like with your wrongfully arrested comment.
I really would like to know more about this case.
quote:Not sure what point you are getting at. The amount of Anthony’s bail reduction was a travesty for the crime and due to him and family renting an almost $900,000 house in a gated neighborhood with private streets and a new additional car in their driveway purchased right after the murder while claiming a higher bail was a financial burden. You shouldn’t imply Kyren’s bail amount was a mistake by comparing it to a mistake and one made in another state. It’s a bad comparison. Also, there were eye witnesses to Kyren illegally passing, speeding, and being the cause of vehicles wrecking as one was trying to avoid Kyren illegally being in his lane.
And then on a complete side note, I saw that the dude who stabbed the high schooler the other day (Karmelo Anthony) was released on $250,000 bail while Kyren was released on $151,000 bail for something his lawyer stated he had nothing to do with. There really wasn't any proof that Kyren caused the wreck.
Posted on 4/16/25 at 5:12 pm to SammyTiger
quote:
how far behind someone are you supposed to drive?
Do you drive 260+ feet behind the car in front of you on the interstate? Because that’s your stopping distance at 70 mph with a 0.25 second reaction time.
Yeah, people should leave enough following distance to fully stop. The vast majority of people don’t. I would bet money that you don’t.
The vast majority of people do have enough sense not to pass in a no-passing zone, on a two-lane road with no shoulder.
Only an idiot or a contrarian would argue that a pedestrian walking into the interstate didn’t “cause the wreck” in the example I gave, regardless of whether that pedestrian is held legally responsible.
Also..
quote:
The answer by law is far enough to stop in anal emergency.
Posted on 4/16/25 at 5:16 pm to Vacherie Saint
quote:
She plows into the back of the truck
are you supposed to be following so close that if the car in front of you hits the breaks you blow into the back of them?
hint: NO you’re not supposed to be following that close.
Posted on 4/16/25 at 5:16 pm to lostinbr
quote:
Do you drive 260+ feet behind the car in front of you on the interstate? Because that’s your stopping distance at 70 mph with a 0.25 second reaction time.
have to factor in the same numbers for the car in front of you
Posted on 4/16/25 at 5:17 pm to dallastigers
quote:
Kyren illegally being in his lane
The truck had the only male driver other than KL and truck didn't get hit.
Herman's wife was driving behind KL and the person who swerved into them was female. She hit Herman's vehicle on driver's side and Herman was the passenger.
This post was edited on 4/16/25 at 5:21 pm
Posted on 4/16/25 at 5:17 pm to lostinbr
quote:
Do you drive 260+ feet behind the car in front of you on the interstate? Because that’s your stopping distance at 70 mph with a 0.25 second reaction time.
depends how fast i’m going and what’s ahead of them.
But i have slammed on my breaks and avoided the car in front of my multiple times.
Posted on 4/16/25 at 5:21 pm to 777Tiger
quote:
have to factor in the same numbers for the car in front of you
Fair (although there are scenarios such as collision in front of you where this isn’t necessarily the case). Pick 100 drivers at random and have the car in front of them lock their brakes. What percentage do you think can avoid accident without swerving into another lane?
What’s more reckless: driving on the wrong side of the road in a no-passing zone with no shoulders or driving too closely behind someone to avoid them when they lock their brakes up?
Posted on 4/16/25 at 5:22 pm to SammyTiger
It depends. In a chain of events you have to consider the diminishing response time and distance involved as you move down the chain. She’s reacting to a vehicle reacting to another vehicle reacting to the victim. At some point, the adequate time and distance is lost. Just like in any multi car pileup. Probably why she was never cited. Comparative fault couldn’t be established. But either way, he’s at fault.
ETA: also consider that the accident happened where the speed limit drops from 55 to 40. She and the truck were coming from the faster side.
ETA: also consider that the accident happened where the speed limit drops from 55 to 40. She and the truck were coming from the faster side.
This post was edited on 4/16/25 at 5:29 pm
Page 7 of 16
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News