- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 3/20/10 at 1:17 pm to arrakis
quote:
It's TheDoc...he shoots off his mouth and can't back it up.
I provided you tons of pictures that shows he has possession.
want to argue if the sky is blue today as well?
Posted on 3/20/10 at 1:18 pm to TheDoc
BS, can you post a pic of that??
Posted on 3/20/10 at 1:18 pm to Books
quote:
he backed it up, you have your head up your arse
where is his evidence that the ball is not in his possession?
this is retarded
Posted on 3/20/10 at 1:19 pm to tigerO
quote:
BS, can you post a pic of that??
Posted on 3/20/10 at 1:20 pm to TheDoc
funny liberals
they call someone out that is showing them evidence and then they run away
they call someone out that is showing them evidence and then they run away
Posted on 3/20/10 at 1:20 pm to arrakis
quote:
Neither am I...merely asking a simple question.
quote:
Is that too difficult for all the FanTards to select one?
1, 2 and 3 all show possession in my eyes. these are stills (obviously) but when you see it in motion he catches it cleanly with his hands and doesn't bobble it with at least one foot in.
Posted on 3/20/10 at 1:23 pm to arrakis
quote:
Neither am I...merely asking a simple question. For it to be a reception, he has to gain possession. Pictures have been posted as evidence. Is that too difficult for all the FanTards to select one?
for it to be a catch, he has to maintain control of the football while getting his foot down inbounds.
Where did he lose control of the football?
Posted on 3/20/10 at 1:24 pm to TheDoc
quote:
hands are around the ball, ball is not moving, foot is inbounds.
OK....glad you found the guts to select one.
Therefore, by your definition, the player is now a runner. If the ball comes loose at this point, it's a fumble.
Just make sure you apply the same standard next year when an LSU receiver's "hands are around the ball, ball is not moving, foot is inbounds" and then drops it.
I'd bet $$$$ you'll whine about it being an incomplete pass.
Posted on 3/20/10 at 1:24 pm to TigerBait1127
quote:JUST CHOOSE A PICTURE!!
Where did he lose control of the football?
Posted on 3/20/10 at 1:25 pm to arrakis
quote:
If the ball comes loose at this point, it's a fumble.
if your aunt had balls, she'd be your uncle.
where is the ball moving?
Posted on 3/20/10 at 1:26 pm to arrakis
quote:
Therefore, by your definition, the player is now a runner. If the ball comes loose at this point, it's a fumble.
Just make sure you apply the same standard next year when an LSU receiver's "hands are around the ball, ball is not moving, foot is inbounds" and then drops it.
I'd bet $$$$ you'll whine about it being an incomplete pass
good lord, I bet everyone in your life hates you
Posted on 3/20/10 at 1:27 pm to arrakis
quote:
Therefore, by your definition, the player is now a runner. If the ball comes loose at this point, it's a fumble.
does the rule not say that he must maintain control of the football while getting at least 1 foot down inbounds?
Show me where he does not maintain control of the football. He has possession before going out of bounds, and it is egregiously obvious
Posted on 3/20/10 at 1:27 pm to arrakis
You asked me why I thought he had possesion.
I showed you and explained it to you.
Now show me in absolutes where he doesn't have possession.
I'll be waiting.
Posted on 3/20/10 at 1:28 pm to TigerBait1127
quote:
does the rule not say that he must maintain control of the football while getting at least 1 foot down inbounds?
Show me where he does not maintain control of the football. He has possession before going out of bounds, and it is egregiously obvious
Arrakis just wants to start shite on the rant
he is charles bronson lite when it comes to this
he'll never be wrong, because in his warped head, he's right, no matter what evidence is shown to him.
Posted on 3/20/10 at 1:29 pm to TheDoc
quote:
good lord, I bet everyone in your life hates you
Only ignorant fans who don't know the rules of the game. Nice standard you set there. I'll save for next year. It will be fun.
Posted on 3/20/10 at 1:29 pm to TheDoc
Ok, you win. The picture clearly shows the sky being blue at the point the pic was taken.
This is how you should respond when proven wrong
This is how you should respond when proven wrong
Posted on 3/20/10 at 1:30 pm to arrakis
quote:
Only ignorant fans who don't know the rules of the game. Nice standard you set there. I'll save for next year. It will be fun.
Nice dodge.
Why can't you answer the question?
because you're a liar, that's why.
Posted on 3/20/10 at 1:30 pm to arrakis
quote:This is your argument? good lord, you are an idiot.
Therefore, by your definition, the player is now a runner. If the ball comes loose at this point, it's a fumble.
Just make sure you apply the same standard next year when an LSU receiver's "hands are around the ball, ball is not moving, foot is inbounds" and then drops it.
Posted on 3/20/10 at 1:31 pm to TheDoc
quote:
Why can't you answer the question?
quote:
he shoots off his mouth and can't back it up.
Popular
Back to top


1



