- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: That ball was on the rim. But we won.
Posted on 2/12/19 at 8:37 pm to tigercraig
Posted on 2/12/19 at 8:37 pm to tigercraig
The ball was off the rim and coming out towards the key which is set for tip in. Also Kentucky hit the rim and also had ARM through the hoop. That’s goaltending.
Posted on 2/12/19 at 8:37 pm to tigercraig
quote:
Goaltending should have been called on them making this all a mute point
What's that? I can’t hear your point....
This post was edited on 2/12/19 at 8:39 pm
Posted on 2/12/19 at 8:39 pm to touchdown moses
What’s the rule then?
Posted on 2/12/19 at 8:40 pm to arseinclarse
Good basket. If there was any way they could have justified interference they would have.
Posted on 2/12/19 at 8:41 pm to tigercraig
quote:
God we have some morons in here
By rule it was basket interference on LSU and it isn’t even debatable.
It isn't even debatable?? Speaking of morons...
Posted on 2/12/19 at 8:47 pm to burdman
Posted on 2/12/19 at 8:53 pm to tigerfish7997
quote:
Basket interference occurs when a player:... Touches the ball while any part of it is within the cylinder that has the ring as its lower base;
So it should have been basket interference on Bigby Williams. Why do I keep seeing people say that's not a college basketball rule but an international rule? Is this rule that you quoted here from the international book, the NBA or the college book?
quote:
Basket interference occurs when a player:...Pulls down a movable ring so that it contacts the ball before the ring returns to its original position, and 5? Causes the basket or backboard to vibrate when the ball is on or within the basket or the backboard and/or is on or in the cylinder?
The Kentucky player with the hand though the basket didn't do either of these. Although he caused the basket or backboard to vibrate it wasn't while the ball was 'on or within the basket or the backboard and/or is on or in the cylinder'
This post was edited on 2/12/19 at 8:55 pm
Posted on 2/12/19 at 8:54 pm to arseinclarse
According to the rule book if the official doesn’t believe the ball has a chance of scoring it’s not a goaltend, even if it’s in the cylinder
Posted on 2/12/19 at 8:55 pm to TigahJay
You WRONG! Learn the rules. It was off the rim and not over the cylinder!
Posted on 2/12/19 at 8:57 pm to bstew3006
quote:if majority is still over cylinder then yes
So if it's off the rim, but 50% of ball is still above (in cylinder) it's goaltending?
I'm not a basketball guy, so please fill me in.
If it is, pretty that could be called 3/4 times a game in every game
Posted on 2/12/19 at 8:58 pm to TigahJay
quote:Glad we won. Cylinder? There’s no debate. About half the ball was inside the cylinder. We got a break…
Definitely wasnt on the rim...debatable whether it was in the cylinder
Posted on 2/12/19 at 8:59 pm to tigerfish7997
quote:
Ball was not in the cylinder.
It was, but it was missed. LSU wins
Posted on 2/12/19 at 8:59 pm to tigerfish7997
quote:
None of those happened. Ball was not on the rim. Ball was not in the cylinder.
quote:
2 Touches the ball while any part of it is within the cylinder that has the ring as its lower base
Well, this happened. The ball was about half within this cylinder.
Posted on 2/12/19 at 9:02 pm to arseinclarse
If the Kentucky player doesn’t vibrate the rim the ball stays on the rim.
Is this called irony?
Is this called irony?
Posted on 2/12/19 at 9:04 pm to tigerfish7997
quote:Of course it was.
. Ball was not in the cylinder
Posted on 2/12/19 at 9:07 pm to tigercraig
quote:
By rule it was basket interference on LSU and it isn’t even debatable.
The refs reviewed it and both announcers called it good. Pretty sure it's at least "debatable".
Posted on 2/12/19 at 9:10 pm to arseinclarse
And the Kentucky player had his hand in the net on the shot. Clearly goal tending. Go back and watch. Ref should have called that in addition to over the back when Naz was rebounding the Kentucky shoot. refs tried to give them Kentucky game.
Posted on 2/12/19 at 9:11 pm to tigercraig
quote:
making this all a mute point
Moot. The word you are trying to use is moot.
Posted on 2/12/19 at 9:11 pm to olgoi khorkhoi
quote:
he refs reviewed it and both announcers called it good.
It’s not reviewable. They were making sure the tip was before time expired
Popular
Back to top


0






