- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Tim Williams on playing LSU
Posted on 5/9/17 at 8:16 pm to Mr. Hangover
Posted on 5/9/17 at 8:16 pm to Mr. Hangover
quote:
And you do the same thing to him so what's the difference?
I dont regurtitate the same tired information over and over hoping that it will change people's minds. I'm defending the current coach...because he hasnt been here long enough to tear down...just as he did when Miles was here. He's defending a coach long gone. See the difference meathead?
Posted on 5/9/17 at 8:19 pm to SportTiger1
quote:
And O gets a complete pass. I guess people see what they want to see, and nothing more.
Bullshite....he doesn't get a pass for either in my book. The only one I hold him completely responsible for is UF. Miles would have fked the pooch as well against Bama and anyone who says different hasnt watched any LSU-Bama games in recent years.
Posted on 5/9/17 at 8:19 pm to Space Cowboy
quote:
Explain to me how O’s stint at Ole Miss was a failure dingbat?
I mean... I... Seriously? Is this an actual question? Are you just an elaborate troll? I'm so confused right now.
quote:
O signed a four-year contract to do it, just like Charlie Strong signed a four-year deal to do it at Texas too. However, after three years the Athletic Department got cold feet and fired O
Maybe he got cold feet because Orgeron had no control of the program and WON 3 SEC GAMES IN 3 YEARS
Holy shite I can't believe you need someone to explain to you why that is a failure.
quote:
Then Houston Nutt gets hired at Ole Miss and comes in and immediately wins with coach O’s player in what would have been coach O’s fourth year of his contract. So, we will see if Tom Herman will be able to win immediately with Charlie Strong’s players next season in what would have been Strong’s fourth year of his contract. If not, then that means that Strong didn’t do as good of a job as O did.
Holy. shite.
Posted on 5/9/17 at 8:23 pm to Gray Tiger
quote:
I asked first. What compels you to denigrate him and call him names? What do YOU gain by that? Does that somehow help your self esteem? Why is it important to you?
It makes you look dumb, and that's a fun day for anyone.
This post was edited on 5/9/17 at 8:24 pm
Posted on 5/9/17 at 8:37 pm to Damone
quote:
Yeah, in trying to argue in favor of 0 he is saying that 0 left the cupboard bare for Nutt.
Let's see, O was hired by Ole Miss to completely rebuild the Ole Miss football program after it had been decimated by David Cutcliffe. He is given a four-year deal to do it in. However, at the end of the third year, Ole Miss's Athletic Department gets cold feet and fires O and then hires Houston Nutt to take his place.
Nutt takes over in what should have been O's fourth year and wins immediately with O's players and wins as long as O's players remain. Once O's players graduate, the Ole Miss program goes down do fast it makes your head spin.
Indeed, O did exactly what he set out to do, rebuild the Ole Miss football program, but is never allowed to enjoy the fruits of his labor because the Ole Miss Athletic Department gets cold feet and fires him.
So how can you construe what I'm saying as me saying that O left the cupboard bare for Nutt? Are you loons retards or something?
Posted on 5/9/17 at 8:40 pm to Space Cowboy
quote:
Indeed, O did exactly what he set out to do
Minus the whole... you know... "win games" part. Which is kind of the goal of every coach in every sport at every level. But let's not get bogged down in pointless stuff like wins and losses. Let's take solace in the fact that Nutt won 9 games with a roster out of which O couldn't squeeze 1 solitary SEC win. That shows me O was the right guy for the job!
Posted on 5/9/17 at 8:46 pm to Space Cowboy
quote:
Space Cowboy
Posted on 5/9/17 at 8:47 pm to Space Cowboy
quote:
it had been decimated by David Cutcliffe
You really have no clue what you're talking about. You also obviously don't know what the word "decimated" means.
Posted on 5/9/17 at 8:49 pm to Mo Jeaux
I've been reading (and sometimes posting) dumb shite on this board for 13+ years. Attempting to classify Orgeron's time at Ole Miss as anything but abject failure is one of the dumbest things I've ever read and I mean it. We can argue all day about whether or not he's learned, changed, grown, etc. But it really isn't a debate that he was fricking atrocious at Ole Miss
Posted on 5/9/17 at 8:54 pm to Space Cowboy
quote:
Let's see, O was hired by Ole Miss to completely rebuild the Ole Miss
Complete bullshite. They won 10 games 2 years before he got there.
Posted on 5/9/17 at 8:55 pm to lsu2006
If Orgeron was from Gary, Indiana is he head coach of LSU today?
Posted on 5/9/17 at 9:00 pm to lsu2006
quote:
I mean... I... Seriously? Is this an actual question? Are you just an elaborate troll? I'm so confused right now.
No…I’m just not retarded like you. My mother didn’t drop me on my head like yours did deliberately when I was a baby.
quote:
Maybe he got cold feet because Orgeron had no control of the program and WON 3 SEC GAMES IN 3 YEARS
Uhm…nobody could have won with Cutcliffe’s players, which is why O was hired in the first place. He was hired to fix the Ole Miss football program from scratch after Cutcliffe had totally decimated it, and he did fix it. In fact, in the fourth year, exactly as O had been hired to do, the football program was completely repaired, and the proof of it is that Houston Nutt was able to win immediately with O’s players. However, once O’s players graduated, Ole Miss under Nutt when downhill so fast it made my head spin.
quote:
Holy shite I can't believe you need someone to explain to you why that is a failure.
You didn’t explain anything. You just demonstrated that you are more than just a little retarded.
Posted on 5/9/17 at 9:02 pm to SportTiger1
quote:
Complete bull shite. They won 10 games 2 years before he got there.
Then why was Cutcliffe fired dingbat?
Posted on 5/9/17 at 9:07 pm to Space Cowboy
Holy fricking lol at you calling anyone a retard. I'm done here. Seek professional help.
Posted on 5/9/17 at 9:11 pm to BayouBengals18
quote:
You really have no clue what you're talking about. You also obviously don't know what the word "decimated" means.
Okay...you wingnut: decimated - To devastate to reduce or destroy significantly but not completely.
Meanwhile, that was really a terrific refutation of me dingbat. Thanks again for demonstrating that you have mush for brains.
Posted on 5/9/17 at 9:14 pm to Mo Jeaux
quote:
you are off your rocker.
Okay, all right, prove it dingbat.
Posted on 5/9/17 at 9:15 pm to SportTiger1
Cutcliffes 2 classes before O got there were ranked 38 and 30. that's right about where O recruited while there. Hardly a rebuilding job.
Posted on 5/9/17 at 9:17 pm to Space Cowboy
I want to commend everyone on the middle school shade being thrown around in this thread.
Posted on 5/9/17 at 9:42 pm to lsu2006
quote:
Minus the whole... you know... "win games" part. Which is kind of the goal of every coach in every sport at every level. But let's not get bogged down in pointless stuff like wins and losses.
Uhm…O wouldn’t have been hired to rebuild the Ole Miss football program after Cutcliffe had decimated it in the first place had it been stocked with good football players. Nobody could have won with those piss poor players O inherited from Cutcliffe, which again is exactly why O was hired. What did your momma drop you on your head even harder than I first thought? Apparently.
quote:
Let's take solace in the fact that Nutt won 9 games with a roster out of which O couldn't squeeze 1 solitary SEC win. That shows me O was the right guy for the job!
Sorry doofus, but Nutt won with O’s recruits. Cutcliffe’s players were no longer there or were on the bench at that time, and Nutt won until O’s players graduated, and then the program went right back downhill. Nutt was then fired and Hugh Freeze was then hired.
Even Freeze who was with O when he was fired, says that Ole Miss made a big mistake when they fired O at the end of three years because if O had been given his final year of his contract, Nutt never would have been hired and Ole Miss’s football program would never have been decimated again.
Posted on 5/9/17 at 9:45 pm to SportTiger1
Had the Ole Miss football program not gone to crap, Cutcliffe never would have been fired and O never would have been hired. So go fly a kite you doofus and stop giving me brain damage with your immense stupidity.
Popular
Back to top



1




