Domain: tiger-web1.srvr.media3.us Will we throw more w Mett? | Page 3 | Tiger Rant
Started By
Message

re: Will we throw more w Mett?

Posted on 10/17/11 at 6:29 pm to
Posted by RBWilliams8
Member since Oct 2009
54024 posts
Posted on 10/17/11 at 6:29 pm to
quote:

And they probably wouldn't have been k rushers in the SEC. you're being an idiot tatum bell was their #1 guy, and he played in the NFL for a bit. if he could play in the NFL, he could play in the SEC but morency would have been a 1,000 yard rusher in the SEC (he had almost 1500 in the big12) also (another NFL back)



That was meant to be a blanket statement for RBs that don't play SEC defenses week in week out. Regardless of what he did there and what he is doing in the next level, he wouldn't had the same number going against SEC football.

Hypothetical theories dont make me an idiot my friend. For all you know he could have had a career ending injury in game 1. You're an idiot for making things personal about an outcome that we are both unknowing of.


Unknown college players never make a name for themselves in the NFL.... Ever. Only the ones with great stats in college.
This post was edited on 10/17/11 at 6:34 pm
Posted by Uncommon Cents
Baton Rouge
Member since May 2008
14381 posts
Posted on 10/17/11 at 6:30 pm to
How does a thread get from a third string QB to failed NFL running backs?
Posted by RBWilliams8
Member since Oct 2009
54024 posts
Posted on 10/17/11 at 6:31 pm to
quote:

you mean backs like keiland williams and charles scott, who couldn't even stick in the NFL (unlike tatum bell and morency)?


So blowing up the NFL is the criteria for being a 1000 yd back in college? Do you not know of any college superstars that were bunk in the NFL? Just because keiland wasn't utilized doran mean he couldn't have had a stellar college career.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
471106 posts
Posted on 10/17/11 at 6:31 pm to
quote:

Regardless of what he did there and what he is doing in the next level, he wouldn't had the same number going against SEC football.

i bet you thought that urban meyer's offense would never work in the SEC
Posted by bulldogger
New Orleans
Member since Mar 2010
2202 posts
Posted on 10/17/11 at 6:35 pm to
quote:

How does a thread get from a third string QB to failed NFL running backs?


Al Qaetards
Posted by RBWilliams8
Member since Oct 2009
54024 posts
Posted on 10/17/11 at 6:36 pm to
You mean an urban Meyers offense with or without tebow? Because without, it went to shite. You probably though auburn would still be a good offense without cam huh?
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
471106 posts
Posted on 10/17/11 at 6:38 pm to
quote:

You mean an urban Meyers offense with or without tebow? Because without, it went to shite.

they lost cam, another mobile QB. they would have been just fine had they kept him

brantley was a pocket passer and not suited for the offense. no idea why he even recruited brantley
Posted by Elleshoe
Wade’s World
Member since Jun 2004
143780 posts
Posted on 10/17/11 at 6:40 pm to
quote:

no idea why he even recruited brantley


5 stars.
Legacy.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
471106 posts
Posted on 10/17/11 at 6:41 pm to
brantley's recruitment is one of the most significant voyages in recent CFB. it fricked up texas and florida
Posted by Elleshoe
Wade’s World
Member since Jun 2004
143780 posts
Posted on 10/17/11 at 6:43 pm to
I haven't read through much of this but I'm trying to figure out how a Mett thread got to Scott/Williams
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
471106 posts
Posted on 10/17/11 at 6:44 pm to
our backs are just so badass that there is no need to throw it more than 15 times a game!!!
Posted by RBWilliams8
Member since Oct 2009
54024 posts
Posted on 10/17/11 at 6:47 pm to
I'm a passing guy, and didn't even bring up keiland and Scott. Just saying that we have had plenty of backs that ha the talent to do so. But whatever makes your point look better.
Posted by RBWilliams8
Member since Oct 2009
54024 posts
Posted on 10/17/11 at 6:52 pm to
quote:

I haven't read through much of this but I'm trying to figure out how a Mett thread got to Scott/Williams



Will we pass more with mett----> probably the same with lee in by himself bc miles likes smashmouth run game ----> something about OSU backs under miles ----> something about miles having better/more quality backs here ----> then somehow keiland and Scott were brought up
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram