Domain: tiger-web1.srvr.media3.us Stocks... | Page 19 | Money Talk
Started By
Message

re: Stocks...

Posted on 5/4/10 at 12:32 pm to
Posted by LSURussian
Member since Feb 2005
134072 posts
Posted on 5/4/10 at 12:32 pm to
How's MVIS doing today?
Posted by Zilla
Member since Jul 2005
10650 posts
Posted on 5/4/10 at 12:38 pm to
quote:

How's MVIS doing today?


why so immature ?


and it's sitting at the same price it opened up at yesterday
This post was edited on 5/4/10 at 12:42 pm
Posted by Zilla
Member since Jul 2005
10650 posts
Posted on 5/4/10 at 12:59 pm to
quote:

I got a hot one :

RTK

how's the chart look on that dude


up 10% since my post yesterday
This post was edited on 5/4/10 at 1:00 pm
Posted by LSURussian
Member since Feb 2005
134072 posts
Posted on 5/4/10 at 1:00 pm to
quote:

How's MVIS doing today?



why so immature ?
Your response made me look up MVIS. My response to you: why so sensitive? It's only down 15 cents today. From the way you responded I thought it must be down a buck minimum.
Posted by Zilla
Member since Jul 2005
10650 posts
Posted on 5/4/10 at 1:06 pm to
you expect me to believe that ? no way in hell you would post that without looking first
Posted by Zilla
Member since Jul 2005
10650 posts
Posted on 5/4/10 at 1:07 pm to
quote:

From the way you responded I thought it must be down a buck minimum.


what this :

quote:

and it's sitting at the same price it opened up at yesterday


oh wait, let me guess, you leave the window open and don't refresh but every 15 or 20 minutes right ? just a little FYI, edits have timestamps ;)
This post was edited on 5/4/10 at 1:08 pm
Posted by LSURussian
Member since Feb 2005
134072 posts
Posted on 5/4/10 at 1:11 pm to
quote:

oh wait, let me guess, you leave the window open and don't refresh but every 15 or 20 minutes right ? just a little FYI, edits have timestamps ;)

I have no idea what you're getting at. What did I edit? And, no, I don't follow MVIS. You should know that by now.


ETA: Anyway, congrats on your other stock that is doing well today. Not many are.
This post was edited on 5/4/10 at 1:12 pm
Posted by Zilla
Member since Jul 2005
10650 posts
Posted on 5/4/10 at 1:55 pm to
your innocent naive playbook is overplayed sir ...but thanks...I nibbled a little at $1.12 ... remember, this is one of those stocks that you once referred to as "another one of Zilla's gems"
Posted by LSURussian
Member since Feb 2005
134072 posts
Posted on 5/4/10 at 1:59 pm to
What did I edit, zilla? I went back and looked and I didn't edit any posts responding to you other than the most recent one congratulating you on the up stock you have. So what are you referring to?
Posted by TheHiddenFlask
The Welsh red light district
Member since Jul 2008
18384 posts
Posted on 5/4/10 at 2:45 pm to
Why can't we all just get along?

P.S. Do either of you understand what Beta is?
Posted by LSURussian
Member since Feb 2005
134072 posts
Posted on 5/4/10 at 2:48 pm to
quote:

Why can't we all just get along?
What would be the fun in that, Rodney?

quote:

Do either of you understand what Beta is?

I was in that club in high school. Does that help?
Posted by TheHiddenFlask
The Welsh red light district
Member since Jul 2008
18384 posts
Posted on 5/4/10 at 2:52 pm to
quote:

I was in that club in high school. Does that help?


That helps about as much as the 8 hours of discussion KFizz, Stick and I had about it.
Posted by Honkus
Member since Aug 2005
57133 posts
Posted on 5/4/10 at 2:53 pm to
Nobody has any insight on clean harbors? I hear they're getting the bulk of the clean up contracts n the gulf
Posted by LSURussian
Member since Feb 2005
134072 posts
Posted on 5/4/10 at 2:55 pm to
I always thought beta = the comparison to market volatility. If beta = 1, the security approximately equals market volatility. A value > 1 = more volatility than the market average. Value < 1 = volatility less than the market average.

Did that definition change recently?
Posted by TheHiddenFlask
The Welsh red light district
Member since Jul 2008
18384 posts
Posted on 5/4/10 at 2:59 pm to
quote:

I always thought beta = the comparison to market volatility. If beta = 1, the security approximately equals market volatility. A value > 1 = more volatility than the market average. Value < 1 = volatility less than the market average.


We agree on this, the question comes with the assumption that a positive beta not only indicates level of volatility relative to the market, but also direction of volatility.

IE:

A stock with a beta of 1 goes up (on average) 1% for every 1% that the market goes up

A stock with a beta of -1 goes down (on average) 1% for every 1% that the market goes up
Posted by LSURussian
Member since Feb 2005
134072 posts
Posted on 5/4/10 at 3:02 pm to
quote:

A stock with a beta of 1 goes up (on average) 1% for every 1% that the market goes up

A stock with a beta of -1 goes down (on average) 1% for every 1% that the market goes up


I didn't know a stock could have a negative beta. I thought beta was 0.00 or greater. Can you give me an example of a stock with a negative beta?

ETA: I know inverse ETF's can have a negative beta, but what stock has a negative beta?
This post was edited on 5/4/10 at 3:12 pm
Posted by TheHiddenFlask
The Welsh red light district
Member since Jul 2008
18384 posts
Posted on 5/4/10 at 3:13 pm to
quote:

I did a scan and came up with this:

# of stocks w/ Betas below 0: 72
# of stocks w/ Betas equal to 0: none
# of stocks w/ Betas between 0 and .49: 518
# of stocks w/ Betas between .5 and .99: 1,282
# of stocks w/ Betas between 1 and 1.49: 1,424
# of stocks w/ Betas between 1.5 and 1.99: 819
# of stocks w/ Betas greater than 2: 745


From RSBR.
Posted by LSURussian
Member since Feb 2005
134072 posts
Posted on 5/4/10 at 3:16 pm to
Could you give me a stock symbol with a negative beta from the list?
Posted by RedStickBR
Member since Sep 2009
14577 posts
Posted on 5/4/10 at 3:18 pm to
THF, surely you understand BETA after that mental marathon we had! Wiki was the most accurate, more so, I might add, than any of the other literature we found on the web and the professors opinions we received

quote:

By definition, the market itself has an underlying beta of 1.0, and individual stocks are ranked according to how much they deviate from the macro market (for simplicity purposes, the S&P 500 is usually used as a proxy for the market as a whole). A stock that swings more than the market (i.e. more volatile) over time has a beta whose absolute value is greater than 1.0. If a stock moves less than the market, the absolute value of the stock's beta is less than 1.0.
More specifically, a stock that has a beta of 2 follows the market in an overall decline or growth, but does so by a factor of 2; meaning when the market has an overall decline of 3% a stock with a beta of 2 will fall 6%. Betas can also be negative, meaning the stock moves in the opposite direction of the market: a stock with a beta of -3 would decline 9% when the market goes up 3% and conversely would climb 9% if the market fell by 3%.
Higher-beta stocks mean greater volatility and are therefore considered to be riskier, but are in turn supposed to provide a potential for higher returns; low-beta stocks pose less risk but also lower returns. In the same way a stock's beta shows its relation to market shifts, it also is used as an indicator for required returns on investment (ROI). If the market with a beta of 1 has an expected return increase of 8%, a stock with a beta of 1.5 should increase return by 12%.
Posted by RedStickBR
Member since Sep 2009
14577 posts
Posted on 5/4/10 at 3:19 pm to
quote:

Could you give me a stock symbol with a negative beta from the list?



Screen of stocks with Beta < 0:

LINK
Jump to page
Page First 17 18 19 20 21 ... 26
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 19 of 26Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram