- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Are we watching something historic with the Warriors?
Posted on 11/5/15 at 11:32 am to Lester Earl
Posted on 11/5/15 at 11:32 am to Lester Earl
He wouldn't even get off the bench for any of the western conference top 5 outside of maybe OKC.
Posted on 11/5/15 at 11:41 am to Boomshockalocka
quote:
Even at full strength the Warriors have something the Cavs don't and that's continuity. Look at the recent champs they're all teams who have been together for multiple seasons with little turnover. CLE won't have that level of comfort this season.
Even at full strength? The Cavs won 2 games against the "historic" Warriors without 2 NBA All Stars. To sit there with a strait face and tell me that with Kyrie and Kevin, the Cavs couldn't have won it all last year is delusional. The Cavs are light years better at this point in the season then they were a year ago. The Cavs were 19-19 and then went on an absolute tear. They are even better this year. Just wait until Kyrie comes back at full strength. The Cavs could be realistically looking at a 13-1 start.
Posted on 11/5/15 at 12:13 pm to Buckeye Backer
Sure they could have. Doesn't mean they would have. Hey clippers were 1-1 without Chris Paul. With him 2-3 vs Houston in the playoffs. Just because the players who are better miss games doesn't mean the team would automatically win games if those guys played. Over a season yes. In a series no. As much as CLE would gain offensively they would lose almost as much defensively by having those guys.
Posted on 11/5/15 at 12:36 pm to Lester Earl
Why do you think I won $ from TBM on fantasy hoops last year? My talent evaluator skills are superior.
Posted on 11/5/15 at 12:37 pm to Boomshockalocka
i didnt think you were scared of a bet until brandin cooks came around, but i was wrong
Posted on 11/5/15 at 12:52 pm to Lester Earl
Cavs got owned in the finals. Warriors>>>>>>> Cavs
Posted on 11/5/15 at 12:56 pm to Tiger Nation 84
Agreed. Warriors weren't even playing all that well and they took it to them.
Posted on 11/5/15 at 1:35 pm to Boomshockalocka
W's are already missing their center. he's fragile (injured a lot anyway).
Not very historic if they do not have the big guy in the middle at playoff time or if the slight substitute is injured (again).
They are a nice team. We can judge if historic after the fact.
They need both centers to be healthy at playoff time and all the rest of them too.
Unlikely that all their best guys are healthy at playoff time.
Kyrie was giving Steph Curry a very hard time before he went out.
Cavs can beat the W's.
If the Cavs and W's are both healthy at playoff time, it will be a great finals. Cavs in 6. Curry goes off for 50 once and Thompson goes on fire in the 3rd quarter for 25 another night. LeBron wins another ring.
The supporting cast for the W's are pretty good. Thompson shows up big time, then the W's can win it all vs Cavs. If not, Cavs win.
Kyrie can't guard them both. Thompson is the key.
Not very historic if they do not have the big guy in the middle at playoff time or if the slight substitute is injured (again).
They are a nice team. We can judge if historic after the fact.
They need both centers to be healthy at playoff time and all the rest of them too.
Unlikely that all their best guys are healthy at playoff time.
Kyrie was giving Steph Curry a very hard time before he went out.
Cavs can beat the W's.
If the Cavs and W's are both healthy at playoff time, it will be a great finals. Cavs in 6. Curry goes off for 50 once and Thompson goes on fire in the 3rd quarter for 25 another night. LeBron wins another ring.
The supporting cast for the W's are pretty good. Thompson shows up big time, then the W's can win it all vs Cavs. If not, Cavs win.
Kyrie can't guard them both. Thompson is the key.
This post was edited on 11/5/15 at 1:37 pm
Posted on 11/5/15 at 1:41 pm to Boomshockalocka
quote:
Boomshockalocka
the cavs would pistol whip your top 5 teams in the western conference besides the warriors and the spurs. To say that they couldnt beat the warriors is pathetic.
Posted on 11/5/15 at 1:51 pm to tigerclaws15
Spurs aren't even the second best team in the west. Stick to you own conference bro. I got the west, ok?
Posted on 11/5/15 at 1:53 pm to Boomshockalocka
quote:
Spurs aren't even the second best team in the west. Stick to you own conference bro. I got the west, ok?
and the rockets are not top 5
Posted on 11/5/15 at 2:05 pm to tigerclaws15
Put some money up bro, I'll put up $2 to every $1 of yours that HOU finishes top 5.
This post was edited on 11/5/15 at 2:06 pm
Posted on 11/5/15 at 2:24 pm to Boomshockalocka
quote:
Put some money up bro, I'll put up $2 to every $1 of yours that HOU finishes top 5.
put money against the cavs record
Posted on 11/5/15 at 2:28 pm to tigerclaws15
Posted on 11/5/15 at 2:30 pm to Boomshockalocka
quote:
OKC, SAS, GSW, LAC, etc etc etc.
all better than houston
Posted on 11/5/15 at 2:34 pm to tigerclaws15
Lets do this:
$25 bet HOU finishes above each one of these teams.
OKC, SAS, LAC
$25 bet HOU finishes above each one of these teams.
OKC, SAS, LAC
This post was edited on 11/5/15 at 2:35 pm
Posted on 11/5/15 at 2:35 pm to Boomshockalocka
Make it 1000 for each
This post was edited on 11/5/15 at 2:36 pm
Posted on 11/5/15 at 2:37 pm to tigerclaws15
I doubt you have that kind of money to lose on a bet. Better to keep it low enough that I have a good chance to collect.
Popular
Back to top


1



