- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: If LeBron was on the lakers....
Posted on 5/18/10 at 10:46 pm to StraightCashHomey21
Posted on 5/18/10 at 10:46 pm to StraightCashHomey21
quote:
that team would be .500 in the awful east
Ther is no way the Cavs without Lebron are a .500 team. Chicago finished .500 and in the 8th spot. There is no way u can say that Cleveland without Lebron isbetter than the Bulls.
1
Posted on 5/18/10 at 10:51 pm to PortCityTiger24
quote:
He beat the Detroit Pistons, who lost to the Celtics the next year in 6 games, who also beat the Lakers in 6 games.
So you are using "this team beat that team but that team but this other team, therefore this team is better than that team" argument and you are calling MINE weak?
If mine as SO weak as you say, point me to an instance where Lebron beat a team with over 53 wins in the playoffs. It should be quite simple if Lebron was BETTER than Kobe at carrying a team.
Posted on 5/18/10 at 10:52 pm to theunknownknight
That's what I thought.
You fail.
You fail.
Posted on 5/18/10 at 10:53 pm to shel311
quote:
Ther is no way the Cavs without Lebron are a .500 team. Chicago finished .500 and in the 8th spot. There is no way u can say that Cleveland without Lebron isbetter than the Bulls.
well if you look at my post after that it pretty much sums it up, they would not be left starless.
Yes they would be at least .500, the bulls being .500 was inexcusable
Posted on 5/18/10 at 10:53 pm to theunknownknight
Stop trying to reason with lebron fanboys, the excuses never end
Posted on 5/18/10 at 10:58 pm to theunknownknight
quote:
This year was inexcusable as the dude gave up on his team
good thing you boy Kobe never quit on his team in a big playoff game.
Oh wait...
Posted on 5/18/10 at 11:01 pm to shel311
quote:
good thing you boy Kobe never quit on his team in a big playoff game.
Oh wait..
That must have been the year Kobe was the reigning 2-time MVP with 2 straight number 1 seeds at 60+ wins and quit/lost to a lesser team for the second straight year...
oh wait...
That's only happened ONCE in NBA History and that honor belongs to your boy.
This post was edited on 5/18/10 at 11:02 pm
Posted on 5/18/10 at 11:03 pm to StraightCashHomey21
quote:
well if you look at my post after that it pretty much sums it up, they would not be left starless.
Yes they would be at least .500, the bulls being .500 was inexcusable
I'm not sure what post you're talking about.
But let me get this straight, you're saying this years Cavs team without Lebron and Jamison coming late on the season, would win more games and would be a better team than Chicago???
I must be missing something here. You can't really believe that lol.
Posted on 5/18/10 at 11:04 pm to theunknownknight
It's just ironic to call out Lebron for quitting when ur a Kobe fan.
Posted on 5/18/10 at 11:05 pm to theunknownknight
quote:
Can no one show me a time where Lebron took a team with zero current starters and beat a 60+ win team?
Wait, when did Kobe do this? You talking about how Kobe ALMOST beat the Suns in seven games? Well LeBron almost single-handedly beat the 66-win Celtics in 2008 - and they actually won the championship that year unlike the Suns in '06.
Posted on 5/18/10 at 11:09 pm to theunknownknight
quote:
So you are using "this team beat that team but that team but this other team, therefore this team is better than that team" argument and you are calling MINE weak?
I was making fun of your argument. Are you THAT fricking dense?
You are grasping for straws man. I'm done here. I'm not trying to convince you of anything because you really have 0 credibility. We know that you believe Kobe is the greatest player that ever lived and the thought of anyone else being better, including Jordan himself, is for some odd reason threatening to you. Your act is tired man, but if that gives you a rise then have at it
This post was edited on 5/18/10 at 11:13 pm
Posted on 5/18/10 at 11:11 pm to shel311
quote:
I'm not sure what post you're talking about.
hell even if some how they didn't get the first pick and ended up taking Melo,Bosh or D Wade later on that squad would still make the playoffs
quote:
But let me get this straight, you're saying this years Cavs team without Lebron and Jamison coming late on the season, would win more games and would be a better team than Chicago???
I must be missing something here. You can't really believe that lol.
note whats above
Posted on 5/18/10 at 11:11 pm to theunknownknight
quote:
That must have been the year Kobe was the reigning 2-time MVP
I think it's safe to say that Kobe will retire with 1 MVP.
GOAT!!
Posted on 5/18/10 at 11:55 pm to mattz1122
quote:
Wait, when did Kobe do this?
You mean BESIDES winning a championship last year or going to the finals 6 times and winning 4 rings?
My contention is that the Lebron Homers are saying Lebron is BETTER than Kobe at carrying a team and he has never beaten a great team in the playoffs. You would think if Lebron was BETTER, he would have won at least ONE of those marquee series in his entire career regardless of his team, considering he "carries" them.
Posted on 5/18/10 at 11:55 pm to PortCityTiger24
quote:
I'm done here
You were done before you started posting.
Posted on 5/19/10 at 2:35 am to theunknownknight
quote:
Forget that Lebron had 4 other All Stars / Former All Stars on his team and Kobe only has 2 other All Stars / Former All Stars
wow
Posted on 5/19/10 at 8:41 am to TigerBait1127
First off you cannot compare the 2 because they do not play the same position. If Kobe is on the Cavs then West is not a starter and there is no reliable SF on the team. If Lebron is on the Lakers then Artest isn't on the team because no way Artest would have signed on to come off the bench.
Posted on 5/19/10 at 8:46 am to YoungJR24
Now one thing I do know is the Cavs with Kobe would have been a more focused and ready team for the playoffs. There would have been none of that pre-game posing and care free shite going on. That fun is okay during the regular season but come playoff time you got to be serious and focused. You've never seen the Lakers, Celtics, Pistons, or Spurs doing any of that.
Posted on 5/19/10 at 8:51 am to YoungJR24
quote:
If Lebron is on the Lakers then Artest isn't on the team because no way Artest would have signed on to come off the bench.
He played the 2 last year with Houston...I'm pretty sure he could do it along side Lebron.
Posted on 5/19/10 at 11:42 am to CRAZY 4 LSU
Must. Stay. Out. Of. This. fricking. Thread.
Page 6 of 18
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News