- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Kentucky vs. Charlotte Bobcats
Posted on 3/25/12 at 3:21 pm to BayouBengals03
Posted on 3/25/12 at 3:21 pm to BayouBengals03
quote:
It's a good point.
People are undervaluing just how fricking bad Charlotte is, though.
They suck in the NBA for sure. But they've still beat (5?) NBA teams this year. Kentucky has lost to two college teams.
Posted on 3/25/12 at 3:21 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:Not that funny, particularly when the talent/depth/age factors start coming into play.
basketball is a funny game, brah
Posted on 3/25/12 at 3:23 pm to SlowFlowPro
Well yeah, Charlotte is an awful NBA team. You also have to factor in the fact that Charlotte would probably play balls to the wall against a college team. The Bobcats may suck, but they still have pride.
Posted on 3/25/12 at 3:23 pm to AlexLSU
But if the game stays close, the pressure is also all on them. 
Posted on 3/25/12 at 3:24 pm to Truculent Typist
quote:
Not that funny, particularly when the talent/depth/age factors start coming into play.
i mean syracuse almost lost to a 16 seed this year. that gap is as big, if not bigger
Posted on 3/25/12 at 3:24 pm to BayouBengals03
It is kind of amazing that DeSagana Diop has managed a 12-year NBA career averaging 2.1 pts and 3.8 rebounds per game.
Posted on 3/25/12 at 3:24 pm to AlexLSU
quote:
The Bobcats may suck, but they still have pride.
i dunno. they do play corey maggette a lot and played fat boris diaw a shite ton earlier
Posted on 3/25/12 at 3:25 pm to Truculent Typist
quote:
Not that funny, particularly when the talent/depth/age factors start coming into play.
Yeah, I don't think it's in the realm of say, baseball, where you've had college teams go toe-to-toe with minor league teams in exhibitions. Cause all you need then is a really good outing from one star pitcher to make it a game.
In contact sports like basketball and football in which top-to-bottom roster depth and physicality are a huge factor, college teams simply can't compete with a pro team.
This post was edited on 3/25/12 at 3:27 pm
Posted on 3/25/12 at 3:25 pm to SlowFlowPro
not all these UK players are going to pan out and be starters or stars in the league they would get skull fricked
Posted on 3/25/12 at 3:26 pm to BayouBengals03
quote:
People are undervaluing just how fricking bad Charlotte is, though.
I honestly don't believe people itt have watched the Bobcats this year. They are fricking awful.
Posted on 3/25/12 at 3:27 pm to StraightCashHomey21
quote:
not all these UK players are going to pan out and be starters or stars in the league
i don't know if charlotte has anybody on their roster who did "pan out"
maybe henerson
Posted on 3/25/12 at 3:28 pm to volfan30
quote:
I honestly don't believe people itt have watched the Bobcats this year. They are fricking awful.
Yeah, but they aren't winless. They've still knocked off 7 NBA teams. They'd have to be winless, with the prospect that just about their entire roster would be cut from the league next year before we could even have this discussion.
Posted on 3/25/12 at 3:29 pm to StraightCashHomey21
quote:
not all these UK players are going to pan out and be starters or stars in the league
The Bobcats have zero stars and being generous, 3 NBA starters.
Posted on 3/25/12 at 3:32 pm to volfan30
Look at how shitty this roster is.
Obviously, if the Bobcats play okay and Kentucky plays poorly, Charlotte wins by 40+.
However, if Kentucky plays really well and gets some momentum going in front of 30,000 of their own fans, they could definitely keep this game close for a while and probably end up losing by 20.
Obviously, if the Bobcats play okay and Kentucky plays poorly, Charlotte wins by 40+.
However, if Kentucky plays really well and gets some momentum going in front of 30,000 of their own fans, they could definitely keep this game close for a while and probably end up losing by 20.
Posted on 3/25/12 at 3:35 pm to BayouBengals03
quote:
Look at how shitty this roster is.
I've already pointed out that a bunch of these players were as good, if not better, in college than anyone on Kentucky not named Anthony Davis and maybe MKG.
This post was edited on 3/25/12 at 3:36 pm
Posted on 3/25/12 at 3:38 pm to xenythx
If any of these Kentucky players played on another team without 5 other future NBA players, they'd average 20+ points and be considered for All-American honors.
You have to take that into consideration. These guys can't reach their maximum statistical potential playing with each other.
You have to take that into consideration. These guys can't reach their maximum statistical potential playing with each other.
This post was edited on 3/25/12 at 3:39 pm
Posted on 3/25/12 at 3:40 pm to xenythx
quote:
I've already pointed out that a bunch of these players were as good, if not better, in college than anyone on Kentucky not named Anthony Davis and maybe MKG.
jones > dj white, bro
davis would be the best player on the court
lamb and walker would be interesting. MKG and henderson is interesting
where chartlotte would win is with their bench
Posted on 3/25/12 at 3:41 pm to BayouBengals03
quote:
You have to take that into consideration. These guys can't reach their maximum statistical potential playing with each other.
just look at terrence jones's stats last year compared to this year (with davis)
Posted on 3/25/12 at 3:45 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
jones > dj white, bro
Absolutely.
Posted on 3/25/12 at 3:47 pm to BayouBengals03
which of these is the better scorer?
Player A:
FG: 47.2%
FT: 85.2%
3PT: 47.4%
Player B:
FG: 42.8%
FT: 81.9%
3PT: 33.0%
Player A:
FG: 47.2%
FT: 85.2%
3PT: 47.4%
Player B:
FG: 42.8%
FT: 81.9%
3PT: 33.0%
Popular
Back to top


0




