Domain: tiger-web1.srvr.media3.us Kentucky vs. Charlotte Bobcats | Page 7 | More Sports
Started By
Message

re: Kentucky vs. Charlotte Bobcats

Posted on 4/1/12 at 4:08 pm to
Posted by bobbyray21
Member since Sep 2009
9490 posts
Posted on 4/1/12 at 4:08 pm to
quote:

WOW. You are a VERY RETARDED pERSON.


Tell me who is better.
Posted by dukke v
PLUTO
Member since Jul 2006
216346 posts
Posted on 4/1/12 at 4:08 pm to
quote:

UK would have the two best players on the court. This means something.



No it doesn't UK lost to VANDY. This is not even an arguement. I have NO clue why you would think UK would have a shot. I guess YOU think Last years Bama football team could beat last years Colts team to.
Posted by tiggerthetooth
Big Momma's House
Member since Oct 2010
64270 posts
Posted on 4/1/12 at 4:09 pm to
Charlotte plays every single day, practicing, playing etc. They are all bigger, stronger, and faster. This is the DUMBEST argument. Charlotte wins 100 out of 100 times IMO. They are grown men regardless of how much you think of Kentucky's NBA prospects. Half of Kentucky's team couldn't even make an NBA roster.
Posted by bobbyray21
Member since Sep 2009
9490 posts
Posted on 4/1/12 at 4:09 pm to
quote:

No it doesn't UK lost to VANDY. This is not even an arguement. I have NO clue why you would think UK would have a shot. I guess YOU think Last years Bama football team could beat last years Colts team to.


Tell me who is better.
Posted by BayouBengals03
lsu14always
Member since Nov 2007
99999 posts
Posted on 4/1/12 at 4:09 pm to
quote:

And Charlotte by 40? Nonsense raised to the gibberish. Charlotte wins by 40? You actually believe that?

If Kentucky plays poorly, an NBA team would beat them by 40. Even a bad one.

Considering the longer game, the bench factor, the rotations, etc.

Kentucky has to knock down shots to stay in the game. If they don't, it could get out of hand in the 2nd half.
Posted by dukke v
PLUTO
Member since Jul 2006
216346 posts
Posted on 4/1/12 at 4:11 pm to
quote:

Half of Kentucky's team couldn't even make an NBA roster.



But UNC's could???? Thats makes me think that from what YOU have said that this years UNC team [with the 5 1stround picks ]could do better than UK. Am I right????
Posted by tiggerthetooth
Big Momma's House
Member since Oct 2010
64270 posts
Posted on 4/1/12 at 4:12 pm to
quote:

But UNC's could???? Thats makes me think that from what YOU have said that this years UNC team [with the 5 1stround picks ]could do better than UK. Am I right????



Nope they could not. Half their team is walk-ons anyhow.
This post was edited on 4/1/12 at 4:13 pm
Posted by dukke v
PLUTO
Member since Jul 2006
216346 posts
Posted on 4/1/12 at 4:13 pm to
quote:

Tell me who is better.



Charlotte. NEXT.
Posted by tiggerthetooth
Big Momma's House
Member since Oct 2010
64270 posts
Posted on 4/1/12 at 4:13 pm to
UNC would get man handled equally.
Posted by bobbyray21
Member since Sep 2009
9490 posts
Posted on 4/1/12 at 4:14 pm to
quote:

Charlotte plays every single day, practicing, playing etc. They are all bigger, stronger, and faster. This is the DUMBEST argument. Charlotte wins 100 out of 100 times IMO. They are grown men regardless of how much you think of Kentucky's NBA prospects. Half of Kentucky's team couldn't even make an NBA roster.


The "grown men" argument is the dumbest argument of any made throughout this thread.

Are NBA rookies "grown men"? So six of the guys on UK's team will be grown men in four months. But they aren't grown men now?

When does the transformation occur?

Mind-boggling dumb. You never want to go full retard. At least make a good argument.
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
112692 posts
Posted on 4/1/12 at 4:15 pm to
quote:

Charlotte wins by 40? You actually believe that?
Most people do.

Charlotte will suit up 12 NBA players, Kentucky will not.

Charlotte has guys who were dominant in CBB, and are better players not.

Charlotte doesn't have a team full of rookies.

Charlotte has won, what, 10 games against NBA teams this year, and they've probably beat a couple of decent teams. YOu don't honestly think Kentucky can beat decent NBA teams, do you?
Posted by dukke v
PLUTO
Member since Jul 2006
216346 posts
Posted on 4/1/12 at 4:15 pm to
quote:

Nope they could not. Half their team is walk-ons anyhow.



BUT you said they have 5[FIVE] 1st round picks on that team. YES the team that is sitting at home after CHOKING. From this. YOUR UNC team is A better equipped team to challenge A so called pro team.
Posted by bobbyray21
Member since Sep 2009
9490 posts
Posted on 4/1/12 at 4:16 pm to
quote:

Charlotte. NEXT.


Let the record reflect that dukke v cannot name two players on Charlotte's roster who are better than MKG or Anthony Davis.

It has been conceded. If they played, the two best players on the court would be playing for Kentucky.

Moving right along.
Posted by dukke v
PLUTO
Member since Jul 2006
216346 posts
Posted on 4/1/12 at 4:17 pm to
quote:

Mind-boggling dumb.


This would be YOU in this thread. FACT.
Posted by tiggerthetooth
Big Momma's House
Member since Oct 2010
64270 posts
Posted on 4/1/12 at 4:18 pm to
quote:

BUT you said they have 5[FIVE] 1st round picks on that team. YES the team that is sitting at home after CHOKING. From this. YOUR UNC team is A better equipped team to challenge A so called pro team



If UNC is 100% healthy YES I think they are better than Kentucky, but NO I do not think they can beat the Charlotte Bobcats.

The grown men argument is very applicable BTW because these guys are developed in every phase of the game physically and mentally which comes with age in many ways.
Posted by dukke v
PLUTO
Member since Jul 2006
216346 posts
Posted on 4/1/12 at 4:18 pm to
quote:

No it doesn't UK lost to VANDY. This is not even an arguement. I have NO clue why you would think UK would have a shot. I guess YOU think Last years Bama football team could beat last years Colts team to.


Tell me who is better.


OK. Are you asking who is better?? The Bama football team, or the Colts???
Posted by tiggerthetooth
Big Momma's House
Member since Oct 2010
64270 posts
Posted on 4/1/12 at 4:19 pm to
quote:

Let the record reflect that dukke v cannot name two players on Charlotte's roster who are better than MKG or Anthony Davis.

It has been conceded. If they played, the two best players on the court would be playing for Kentucky.

Moving right along.


WOW. MKG and Anthony Davis can barely hit a jump shot and you talk like this? Kemba Walker and Augustin would hit 3's ALL DAY long. UK does not have 1 guy who could shoot above 30% from the NBA 3 point line IMO.
Posted by dukke v
PLUTO
Member since Jul 2006
216346 posts
Posted on 4/1/12 at 4:20 pm to
quote:

Let the record reflect that dukke v cannot name two players on Charlotte's roster who are better than MKG or Anthony Davis.



And this matters HOW????????? What a STUPID PUNK KID YOU ARE. Go play in the sandbox little boy.
Posted by dukke v
PLUTO
Member since Jul 2006
216346 posts
Posted on 4/1/12 at 4:21 pm to
quote:

but NO I do not think they can beat the Charlotte Bobcats.



Thats all I was asking.
Posted by Tactical1
Denham Springs
Member since May 2010
27139 posts
Posted on 4/1/12 at 4:22 pm to
Not another one of these.
Jump to page
Page First 5 6 7 8 9 ... 13
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 7 of 13Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram