- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Notre Dame 3 @ Clemson 30 Final - ESPN
Posted on 12/29/18 at 3:46 pm to East Coast Band
Posted on 12/29/18 at 3:46 pm to East Coast Band
Question: how was that not illegal touching on the guy who recovered it anyway? Went out and was the first to touch the ball
0
Posted on 12/29/18 at 3:46 pm to dawgfan24348
Chip Kelly is saying they need to have conclusive evidence to overturn the call on the field. There's no way you're able to make that determination.
Posted on 12/29/18 at 3:46 pm to SpartyGator
That's bullshite you could not see that ball touching out of bounds
Posted on 12/29/18 at 3:46 pm to TheWalrus
Right call by refs and stupid decision to take the ball out of the endzone
Posted on 12/29/18 at 3:46 pm to Civildawg
fricking refs keeping Clemson alive so Bama can play Clemson instead of ND...wait...
Posted on 12/29/18 at 3:46 pm to Civildawg
quote:
clearly
You don't know what this means.
Posted on 12/29/18 at 3:46 pm to dawgfan24348
WTF is this shite? I thought the refs were for ND?!!?
Posted on 12/29/18 at 3:46 pm to Mr Perfect
quote:
If the ball is hovering over the sidelines it's out?
Thats just it I don't think you can tell that the ball is touching out of bounds and not just the end hanging over the sideline.
Posted on 12/29/18 at 3:46 pm to Civildawg
(no message)
This post was edited on 4/8/23 at 5:56 pm
Posted on 12/29/18 at 3:46 pm to AlterDWI
ND MILF would get it
Posted on 12/29/18 at 3:46 pm to East Coast Band
If the belly of the football is touching the ground flat in bounds, but the nose is overlapping the line without touching the ground, is that in bounds or out?
This post was edited on 12/29/18 at 3:47 pm
Posted on 12/29/18 at 3:46 pm to Civildawg
But the actual ball never actually touched the sideline - the nose over sideline doesn’t make it out.
Posted on 12/29/18 at 3:46 pm to jevins_slickin
Coommentators and the ABC rules expert all said it was the right call.
Posted on 12/29/18 at 3:47 pm to genro
That’s inbounds
Posted on 12/29/18 at 3:47 pm to AlterDWI
once again, this is immediate to Birmingham people 
Posted on 12/29/18 at 3:47 pm to JuiceTerry
Terrible reversal. A Football is not square. The only time the nose of the football is touching the ground is when it is basically up-and-down. Not when it is sideways. Clowns.
Posted on 12/29/18 at 3:47 pm to Buckeye06
quote:This. Did ESPN clarify? I didn’t hear anything specific.
I think OOB, but does the ball have to touch out of bounds or just be over the line? Like did the nose have to touch out of bounds or just be over that line?
Posted on 12/29/18 at 3:47 pm to Cobrasize
10th year senior Renfrow got popped
Posted on 12/29/18 at 3:47 pm to theunknownknight
I think his hand might have been out of bounds when he touched the ball and it reversed back in toward the field.
Posted on 12/29/18 at 3:47 pm to Roscoe
quote:
Coommentators and the ABC rules expert all said it was the right call.
The SEC media wing said it was correct? No. fricking. Way.
Page 12 of 47
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News