- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 1/1/20 at 8:19 pm to Dr RC
quote:
or the runner up from the championship game
Nope, they get the next highest ranked team in the CFP rankings. Now, that will probably be the CG loser the majority of the time, but not always. Hell, had LSU not lost the 7OT game last year, there was a chance they would have been ranked ahead of Georgia at the end and gone Sugar instead of Fiesta
Posted on 1/1/20 at 8:22 pm to Dr RC
The committee ranking determines who the runner ups are but I get that it's not their fault. How ever you want to slice it there should be more leeway to make better matchups.
Posted on 1/1/20 at 8:23 pm to OldManRiver
The SEC/Big 12 tie-in is KILLING the Sugar Bowl.
Should have been Baylor/Memphis in the Cotton Bowl, and Georgia/Penn State in the Sugar Bowl
Should have been Baylor/Memphis in the Cotton Bowl, and Georgia/Penn State in the Sugar Bowl
Posted on 1/1/20 at 8:24 pm to slackster
quote:
It's what happens when the playoff committee makes the shitty arse match ups.
This is the Sugar Bowl's own fault.
Posted on 1/1/20 at 8:26 pm to Eat Your Crow
The Sugar Bowl has visions of Texas or Oklahoma being in the consistently that’s why they made the deal.
Posted on 1/1/20 at 8:30 pm to udtiger
quote:UGA's fanbase is also Baptist and conservative. Tons of Baylor fans in NO. Like UGA they work hard and play hard.
You know Baylor is a pretty Baptist school and Waconis pretty conservative.
I'd imagine their fans may be wary of NO and its reputation.
Posted on 1/1/20 at 8:32 pm to RLDSC FAN
quote:
Playoffs are killing the rest of the bowls
This.
Might be better to have a plus-one or the playoff after the bowls. Then the top teams are still playing for something.
Posted on 1/1/20 at 8:33 pm to bomber77
quote:Yep. They've got an inflated sense of self. Winning in that half-assed SEC East has them thinking they're actually a big time program.
Anybody that lost to South Carolina ought to be be grateful to be playing period.
Posted on 1/1/20 at 8:35 pm to Bestbank Tiger
Why can’t we just accept that non playoff games don’t mean anything. Then it will be a lot easier to just enjoy football during two weeks in December when there isn’t a whole lot going on.
A two point game under 4 minutes isn’t any less fun to watch because isn’t a playoff game.
A two point game under 4 minutes isn’t any less fun to watch because isn’t a playoff game.
Posted on 1/1/20 at 8:35 pm to Drew Brews
Silly matchup. No one cares about seeing Baylor.
Posted on 1/1/20 at 8:37 pm to RLDSC FAN
quote:They are weeding out the fair-weather fan form the true fan. Even if your team is not in the playoff, a bowl is the last time of the year to watch them play, plus it's generally against a rare opponent. If fans can't be interested in that, they suck!
Playoffs are killing the rest of the bowls
Posted on 1/1/20 at 8:40 pm to Dizz
quote:In the past, besides the separate bowls hosting #1 and #2, the other bowls didn't really mean anything.
Why can’t we just accept that non playoff games don’t mean anything
Posted on 1/1/20 at 8:43 pm to Jake88
quote:
In the past, besides the separate bowls hosting #1 and #2, the other bowls didn't really mean anything.
From the way people talk about it now you would think every bowl game had some importance before the playoff.
Posted on 1/1/20 at 8:46 pm to Jake88
Bowl games are a reward for the players and a time when the fan base can travel and enjoy the team they support cap their seasons. This is still true. For some reason because of the success the sec has had its fans seem to find it bothersome unless they are playing for a national championship even though Alabama is the only team to win one in the playoff era.
Posted on 1/1/20 at 8:48 pm to Eat Your Crow
quote:Big 10 was too coward to play the SEC.
The SEC/Big 12 tie-in is KILLING the Sugar Bowl.
Should have been Baylor/Memphis in the Cotton Bowl, and Georgia/Penn State in the Sugar Bowl
Posted on 1/1/20 at 8:48 pm to Dizz
quote:
A two point game under 4 minutes isn’t any less fun to watch because isn’t a playoff game.
Agree. I'll watch if a team I like is in a bowl.
Problem with the Sugar Bowl is UGA and Baylor are coming off losses that knocked them.out of playoff contention. So the fans see the game as a disappointment instead of being happy to be there.
Compare that to the Sugar Bowl against Illinois. We weren't expecting a natty that year so it was a great finish to a fun season.
Posted on 1/1/20 at 8:48 pm to Eat Your Crow
quote:
The SEC/Big 12 tie-in is KILLING the Sugar Bowl. Should have been Baylor/Memphis in the Cotton Bowl, and Georgia/Penn State in the Sugar Bowl
This! Should never have paired up with the Big 12. If it’s not Texas or OU, SEC fans won’t be excited... even though Baylor is top 10. UGA-Penn St would have drawn a lot more interest
Posted on 1/1/20 at 8:49 pm to OldManRiver
Do we need to move this game back to Tulane Stadium?
Posted on 1/1/20 at 8:55 pm to bomber77
quote:that’s about to change in a couple days my friend
Alabama is the only team to win one in the playoff era.
Popular
Back to top


0






