- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Films vs Movies
Posted on 4/28/25 at 4:00 pm to indytiger
Posted on 4/28/25 at 4:00 pm to indytiger
quote:
I've noticed several posters on here correcting people about using the term film for a movie, and movie for a film.
They are and should be used interchangeably, and I almost don't believe you that people have been correcting usages. You might have examples, but the premise here is ridiculous. There shouldn't be any correcting going on for film vs. movie.
0
Posted on 4/28/25 at 4:04 pm to 3nOut
quote:
they're all just movies. i don't call them anything other than in polite company because i'm not a complete douche.
but i do say in our house, we define what we're watching as flicks, films, and movies. but we do that in terms of what kind of thing we want to watch.
Drop was a great little flick.
Sinners was a good movie
Warfare was a film.
again, that's just in house douchebaggery, not how i'd talk about it in polite company.
lol, this is a fair analysis. what does "picture" fall into the heirarchy? as in, "that director used to make great pictures"
Posted on 4/28/25 at 4:46 pm to indytiger
I've never heard it called a film theater.
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News