Domain: tiger-web1.srvr.media3.us Interstellar - Official Trailer | Page 5 | Movie/TV Board
Started By
Message

re: Interstellar - Official Trailer

Posted on 5/17/14 at 12:01 pm to
Posted by Cs
Member since Aug 2008
10680 posts
Posted on 5/17/14 at 12:01 pm to
quote:

but judging just the trailer alone, there should be little/no excitement


quote:

people are (rightfully) excited about the movie.


If the trailer "shouldn't" elicit excitement, then why should people be "rightfully" excited about the film?

You mentioned the concept was already trite, so, presumably, that shouldn't elicit undue excitement. Nolan has failed in the past, so simply because his name is attached to the film shouldn't automatically warrant excitement. Matthew Mcconaughey is still trying to rectify his abysmal cinematic outings from earlier in his career, and is hardly a lock to pull off the role of an engineer/scientist.

On what ground do people have to be "rightfully" excited about the film, if not for the trailer itself?
Posted by Duzz
Houston
Member since Feb 2008
10219 posts
Posted on 5/17/14 at 12:04 pm to
I don't get what they are trying to do, the planet is almost dead and they are going into space for...?

Even if they did find another planet how do they even mine the materials and bring it back or migrate enough people?

From the trailer it look like they are trying to find more resources or alien life.
Posted by Cs
Member since Aug 2008
10680 posts
Posted on 5/17/14 at 12:04 pm to
quote:

If it's Nolan, chances are we aren't gonna get any details. This might be the last trailer we get


Doubtful, unfortunately.

People who have read the full script have mentioned that every frame in this trailer is from the first 1/3 of the film, and that the actual plot doesn't truly commence until the ship enters the wormhole. So, while this trailer shows us nothing about what the film is actually about, I feel that subsequent trailers undoubtedly will.

The second trailer for Inception showed every major action sequence from every major level - limbo, level 3, level 2, level 1...even the plane. There wasn't one scene in the actual film that was a "surprise", simply because we had been exposed to every segment of the film from the trailer.
This post was edited on 5/17/14 at 12:09 pm
Posted by Cs
Member since Aug 2008
10680 posts
Posted on 5/17/14 at 12:07 pm to
quote:

I don't get what they are trying to do, the planet is almost dead and they are going into space for...?

Even if they did find another planet how do they even mine the materials and bring it back or migrate enough people?

From the trailer it look like they are trying to find more resources or alien life.



There is an extreme food shortage on the planet. From the trailer, it appears that a wormhole opens up near Saturn, and we apparently travel through it in hopes of finding aid.

Based on the quotes in the trailer, this doesn't seem to be a "save the planet" type of film.

"We're not meant to save the planet...we're meant to leave it."

"Mankind was born on Earth...it was never meant to die here."

"We must reach far beyond our own lifespans."

"We must think not as individuals, but as a species."

Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
471479 posts
Posted on 5/17/14 at 12:08 pm to
quote:

If the trailer "shouldn't" elicit excitement, then why should people be "rightfully" excited about the film?

they are 2 different things. we know the basics of the film, and knew them prior to the trailer

the trailer added nothing except it showed you some of the DP/cinematography and some of the acting

...and it had the song from V for Vendetta

i guess another way to put it is there is nothing noteworthy about the trailer. it adds nothing to what we knew

quote:

You mentioned the concept was already trite, so, presumably, that shouldn't elicit undue excitement.

no

i said the concept is not novel, so proclaiming it to be novel is off base. i can get excited for non-novel movies

quote:

Nolan has failed in the past, so simply because his name is attached to the film shouldn't automatically warrant excitement.

wut

quote:

On what ground do people have to be "rightfully" excited about the film, if not for the trailer itself?

director, actor(s), concept. things that were known prior to the trailer and to which teh trailer added 0

nolan makes good movies. MM is a good leading man. nolan has shown he's solid in the concept of fantasy/sci fi merging

all of those things create an aura of excitement, which i will not deny (as i am excited over the movie)

the trailer, however, did nothing for me. as i said earlier, this is not an indictment on the movie itself. it just adds nothing, so its addition to any excitement should mirror that and constitute nothing
Posted by Cs
Member since Aug 2008
10680 posts
Posted on 5/17/14 at 12:25 pm to
quote:

concept. things that were known prior to the trailer and to which teh trailer added 0


Most individuals had no idea what the film was even about from the teaser, and some individuals still don't comprehend the basic premise (see the post 4 spots up). So, I would posit that there are quite a few individuals who were "excited" to learn details related to this film that weren't explicitly revealed in the teaser, such as wormholes, global foot shortages, cryostasis, as well as an introduction to the characters, their relationships, etc.

Additionally, excitement is a subjective emotion - something that may elicit excitement in one individual may not elicit the same degree of excitement in another individual. It seems a bit fatuous that one could think they could set an objective standard by which the emotion of excitement is generated within an individual. It's akin to saying that you don't love someone, so you don't see a reason why anyone else should suddenly love that person.
This post was edited on 5/17/14 at 12:30 pm
Posted by Freauxzen
Washington
Member since Feb 2006
38563 posts
Posted on 5/17/14 at 1:15 pm to
Pretty meh, even by Nolan standards. It may be the intent, but remember, people thought Gravity would trail off into something COMPLETELY different until details came out.
Posted by jeff5891
Member since Aug 2011
15943 posts
Posted on 5/17/14 at 2:08 pm to
quote:

it adds nothing to what we knew
Uh it told me what theory of space travel they are going for which I did not see in the first trailer.


quote:

Cs

I wouldn't engage SFP. He will literally post 100 times in a thread to tell you why your subjective opinion is wrong and his is right.
This post was edited on 5/17/14 at 2:13 pm
Posted by GatorsGators
Member since Oct 2012
13802 posts
Posted on 5/19/14 at 8:33 pm to
quote:

the best example of people claiming i was trolling and then me being proven 100% right was the dark knight. the group think and expectations for that movie were so high, any criticism of the movie during the theater run was called trolling. years later looking back, the flaws are accepted 100%
TDK is flawless

I'm assuming you mean TDKR

I caved and read the leaked Interstellar script from 2008. It's good, although there are some plot points that I don't think will fly with Nolan's anti-CGI ways.
Posted by JombieZombie
Member since Nov 2009
7687 posts
Posted on 5/19/14 at 9:04 pm to
quote:

TDK is flawless


Far from it.
Posted by GatorsGators
Member since Oct 2012
13802 posts
Posted on 5/19/14 at 9:09 pm to
I guess there's no such thing as a truly "flawless" movie then.

TDK gets as close to being flawless as a big-budget modern blockbuster can get.
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 5Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram