Domain: tiger-web1.srvr.media3.us New Transformers Movie | Page 5 | Movie/TV Board
Started By
Message

re: New Transformers Movie

Posted on 2/7/11 at 5:23 pm to
Posted by alajones
Huntsvegas
Member since Oct 2005
35876 posts
Posted on 2/7/11 at 5:23 pm to
quote:

This is a serious question - if you are in the market for something so frivolous to begin with, do you even need the pretense of narrative? Would you be equally happy just watching random action scenes employing the latest technology?
Kind of like a porn without the pretense of a plot. Those are the best ones. But I expect a little more from a movie.
Posted by The Egg
Houston, TX
Member since Dec 2004
83426 posts
Posted on 2/7/11 at 5:24 pm to
quote:

I'd rather watch another Fast & Furious movie, or Cowboys vs Aliens
battle LA my brotha
Posted by Tiger JJ
Member since Aug 2010
545 posts
Posted on 2/7/11 at 5:30 pm to
quote:

Kind of like a porn without the pretense of a plot.


Yeah, exactly. Do they even make porn movies anymore? Seems like it's been totally reduced to what it should be...discrete video clips for distribution on the internet. Why can't The Transformers be the same way? If everyone already admits upfront how fricking stupid the "plot" is to begin with, then why even bother with it at all?
Posted by Rohan2Reed
Member since Nov 2003
75674 posts
Posted on 2/7/11 at 5:34 pm to
quote:

"popcorn flciks"


quote:

Jaws, Raiders of the Lost Ark, The Lord of the Rings, E.T.



you probably think the original Rocky is a popcorn flick as well
Posted by GamecockAlum
SC
Member since Dec 2010
7705 posts
Posted on 2/7/11 at 6:03 pm to
quote:

Jetfire


Dude was an OG

quote:

the leg humper


Funny little fricker

quote:

the femme bot


Isabel Lucas is

quote:

the ghetto-bots


greatness

quote:

the stoned mom,


No arguments here.

quote:

the pointless roommate, the annoying sector 7 dude,


Both had a purpose, but the roommate role was retyped at the 12th hour due to Jonah Hill backing out of the role.

quote:

KILLIING THE BAD GUY


Only a Prime can kill another prime bruh. Seems to me you didn't pay any attention to what was actually going on in the film and made your mind up going into it and stuck to it.

quote:

The main Decepticon was invented just for the movie and was not an original Decepticon from the 80's.



The Fallen was not a new character bruh. Was he changed up a bit? Sure, but he was not a new character or "invented" for the movie. Some background knowledge forya.
Posted by MagillaGuerilla
Nick Fairley Fan Club, Founder
Member since Nov 2009
35729 posts
Posted on 2/7/11 at 6:49 pm to
quote:

The Fallen was not a new character bruh. Was he changed up a bit? Sure, but he was not a new character or "invented" for the movie. Some background knowledge forya.


It wasn't in the original series, so it's basically a new character.

Posted by Archie Bengal Bunker
Member since Jun 2008
15603 posts
Posted on 2/7/11 at 7:14 pm to
quote:

It wasn't in the original series, so it's basically a new character.


No, that is perfectly acceptable. You can change a correct completely, as long as you keep the name or costume.

Sincerely,

The Movie Board...
who thinks that Catwoman does not have to be a burglar, Bane can be venom-less. A character is just a name, who cares about their story!




On a more serious note.... Here is the clip in case you missed it or want to see it again: LINK


Screenshots:

No more covering up this story! (and what the frak, they are just invading alien ships, not robots?)


A FRAKKING DRAGON???


Anyone recognize this bot?????





It's Optimus, slashin countless fools with his sword! See the problem with the action sequences, now? (not that you didn't before)

Posted by GamecockAlum
SC
Member since Dec 2010
7705 posts
Posted on 2/7/11 at 7:53 pm to
Your screenshots are blurry as shite dude. How the frick was anyone suppose to recognize who it is? Even then, I probably would have guess Optimus because of the amount of red and blue on his build.

Maybe they are including a big alien dragon robot. Is there a problem with that? If you don't like it then.... *insert hick voice* GETTTTTT OUTTTTTTTT!
Posted by alajones
Huntsvegas
Member since Oct 2005
35876 posts
Posted on 2/7/11 at 7:59 pm to
quote:

Only a Prime can kill another prime bruh. Seems to me you didn't pay any attention to what was actually going on in the film and made your mind up going into it and stuck to it.
The other six robots were PRIMES!!! YOUR LINK JUST TOLD ME THAT AND IT SAYS IT IN THE MOVIE!!!

Don't presume anything about me please.

quote:

The Fallen was not a new character bruh. Was he changed up a bit? Sure, but he was not a new character or "invented" for the movie.
According to your link, his earliest reference is 2007! Really! Hardly what I would call an original Decepticon.
This post was edited on 2/7/11 at 8:00 pm
Posted by Archie Bengal Bunker
Member since Jun 2008
15603 posts
Posted on 2/7/11 at 9:29 pm to
quote:

According to your link, his earliest reference is 2007! Really! Hardly what I would call an original Decepticon.


The earliest TOY was 2007, the character made his first appearance in a 2002-2003 comic run. Still not legacy, but not exactly created for the movie (2009).
Posted by Archie Bengal Bunker
Member since Jun 2008
15603 posts
Posted on 2/7/11 at 9:37 pm to
quote:

Your screenshots are blurry as shite dude.


Blame the clip quality then. I still contend that the "blurriness" is due to the fast paced action.

quote:


Maybe they are including a big alien dragon robot. Is there a problem with that? If you don't like it then.... *insert hick voice* GETTTTTT OUTTTTTTTT!


Slow your roll defensive fanboy. I like Transformers; I like the idea of a Transformers movie; and I liked the first Transformers movie. The second one, to be polite, more than left something to be desired.

It just adds to my speculation that the too many robots problem will persist in the third movie. I will likely still see it, but the trailer looked really busy, even given that it was a short trailer. When I watched the trailer live, I had no idea who that robot was. Did you even watch the clip again? Or are you in full on defense mode?

Watch the clip (non-stop), and name 5... hell, name even 3 robots.... not named Optimus.
Posted by TheoreticalTiger
Big 10 Football sucks!!!
Member since Sep 2010
2698 posts
Posted on 2/7/11 at 9:51 pm to
quote:

The crazy action wasn't what killed it from me. It was the ghetto-bots and perv-ticons.

When you have a small transformer humping your leading lady's leg, that's when you know the movie has hit rock bottom.



Yea... The second Transformers was a disaster but even the 1st one had some disappointing moments that weren't funny. Anthony Anderson who I like was really not funny as a computer hacker. Also, the guy Area 51 guy tries way too had.

IMO, they need to drop the silliness and stick to badarseness fwiw.
Posted by GamecockAlum
SC
Member since Dec 2010
7705 posts
Posted on 2/7/11 at 10:22 pm to
quote:

The other six robots were PRIMES!!! YOUR LINK JUST TOLD ME THAT AND IT SAYS IT IN THE MOVIE!!!

Don't presume anything about me please.


No shite that his brothers were Primes. Did you not see the flashback scene that showed them sacrificing themselves to protect the Matrix? Come on bruh, how you going to bash a movie and not even know what went down?

quote:

According to your link, his earliest reference is 2007! Really! Hardly what I would call an original Decepticon


I never said he was an original Decepticon. I said he wasn't made up for the movie bruh and was I or was I not correct in that assertion?
Posted by MagillaGuerilla
Nick Fairley Fan Club, Founder
Member since Nov 2009
35729 posts
Posted on 2/7/11 at 11:15 pm to
quote:

No shite that his brothers were Primes. Did you not see the flashback scene that showed them sacrificing themselves to protect the Matrix? Come on bruh, how you going to bash a movie and not even know what went down?


Ancestors, not brothers.

And as far as the movie is concerned, it follows very little of the animated series...
Posted by GamecockAlum
SC
Member since Dec 2010
7705 posts
Posted on 2/7/11 at 11:28 pm to
quote:

Blame the clip quality then. I still contend that the "blurriness" is due to the fast paced action.


When I initially watched it, my only reaction was WOW.

quote:

Slow your roll defensive fanboy.


Whoaaaaaaa now. I'm no fanboy. I enjoy the movies but I don't own a single piece of Transformers merchandise.

quote:

Did you even watch the clip again?


Yes. I was pretty sure it was Optimus when I first saw it because of the blue and red and he used the sword before (Interstate interchange fight in T1).

I'm only familiar with a handful of Transformers to begin with. I did recognize Bumblebee . Outside of OP and BB, the only Autobots I know are the Ghettobots (they weren't in the trailer), Ironhide (The truck), and Ratchet (red and yellow truck), but neither of the last two were in the trailer. I know Megatron and Starscream, but saw neither of them. Wikipedia has a list of all of the Transformers that will be in the movie, so I'll probably do some more reading when time gets closer to the movie. I don't know if you saw the teaser from December that took place on the moon, but the robot they zoom in on at the end is OP's papa (supposedly at least).
Posted by cene
Goldens Meadowsss
Member since Dec 2007
2353 posts
Posted on 2/8/11 at 12:20 am to
the dragon is laser beak

the flying thing is Ultimate Prime since octimus' trailer will be a used in this movie or prime with him attached to silverbolt

i don't know what the hell the flying ships are going to be in this movie.

personally i hope this one is as good as the first which was actually decent. Unfortunately i see it being exactly like the second one with way too much going on and absolutely no direction.
This post was edited on 2/8/11 at 12:53 am
Posted by alajones
Huntsvegas
Member since Oct 2005
35876 posts
Posted on 2/8/11 at 8:38 am to
quote:

No shite that his brothers were Primes. Did you not see the flashback scene that showed them sacrificing themselves to protect the Matrix? Come on bruh, how you going to bash a movie and not even know what went down?
You just argued that they didn't kill the main bad guy because only a Prime can kill another prime and now you are saying that those other guys were primes and could have killed him?!?!?! But instead of just killing him, which they could have done, they killed themselves and locked away the matrix of leadership.

That, is a stupid storyline.
This post was edited on 2/8/11 at 8:45 am
Posted by GamecockAlum
SC
Member since Dec 2010
7705 posts
Posted on 2/8/11 at 8:48 am to
quote:

You just argued that they didn't kill the main bad guy because only a Prime can kill another prime and now you are saying that those other guys were primes and could have killed him?!?!?! But instead of just killing him, which they could have done, they killed themselves and locke daway the matrix of leadership.



You didn't watch the movie did you?

Only a Prime can kill another Prime. The Fallen's brothers did try to whip his arse and put him in his place but he wasn't having it. They were like well we aren't going to beat this dude (wasn't like he was rolling solo) so all of the Primes with the exception of Optimus stowed away in the desert and sacrificed themselves to protect the Matrix.

Ya dig?
Posted by alajones
Huntsvegas
Member since Oct 2005
35876 posts
Posted on 2/8/11 at 8:53 am to
quote:

You didn't watch the movie did you?
I've seen this movie like 20 times.
quote:

The Fallen's brothers did try to whip his arse and put him in his place but he wasn't having it.
This isn't what I got out of the flashback scene.
Posted by alajones
Huntsvegas
Member since Oct 2005
35876 posts
Posted on 2/8/11 at 8:55 am to
quote:

Primes with the exception of Optimus
I don't think you were paying attention. Optimus wasn't around. He is a descendent.
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram