Domain: tiger-web1.srvr.media3.us Rambo: First Blood vs First Blood Part II | Page 2 | Movie/TV Board
Started By
Message

re: Rambo: First Blood vs First Blood Part II

Posted on 10/15/11 at 2:31 pm to
Posted by WikiTiger
Member since Sep 2007
41055 posts
Posted on 10/15/11 at 2:31 pm to
quote:

First Blood is a real movie about the after-effects of the Vietnam war...socio-economic situations, how society wanted to move on and forget and how disposable the marginalized people are in mainstream society. The country was still lost and Stallone portrayed that broken-compass confusion perfectly. It has real heart to the story like the original Rocky and the acting and small dialogue matter...like Rourke did recently in The Wrestler. The plot in First Blood could and probably did and probably still does happen in small jerk-water towns across America. The sheriff and the law pushing people around they don't like.

Part II was a Chuck Norris flick.




pretty much exactly what I came here to type.

FWIW, "First Blood" is a pretty good book that really delves deeply into the PTSD issue

The character of John Rambo was not meant to be an action hero.
Posted by Flair Chops
to the west, my soul is bound
Member since Nov 2010
35649 posts
Posted on 10/15/11 at 3:07 pm to
Part II, hands down.

Murdock, I'm comin to get you.

How will you live, John?
Day by day

Rambo, what mean expendable?

I want what they want and every other guy who came over here and spilled his guts and gave everything he had wants, for our country to love us as much as we love it.

Posted by lsufan112001
sportsmans paradise
Member since Oct 2006
11178 posts
Posted on 10/15/11 at 3:48 pm to
I'll take the first one by far...
Posted by Zamoro10
Member since Jul 2008
14743 posts
Posted on 10/15/11 at 4:07 pm to
And just to clinch First Blood easily over Part II - the music...

First Blood has this:

It's a Long Road

Part II doesn't.
Posted by theunknownknight
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2005
60696 posts
Posted on 10/15/11 at 4:16 pm to
quote:


First Blood has this:

It's a Long Road

Part II doesn't.





fail. it is in the Rambo II soundtrack. Track 5: Stories.
Posted by Zamoro10
Member since Jul 2008
14743 posts
Posted on 10/15/11 at 5:05 pm to
quote:

The character of John Rambo was not meant to be an action hero.


Glad you brought this up...in the book he dies.

In fact, in the original First Blood ending, Rambo dies.

LINK
Posted by Zamoro10
Member since Jul 2008
14743 posts
Posted on 10/15/11 at 5:05 pm to


Well, they knew they had a winner and copied from the best.
Posted by magildachunks
Member since Oct 2006
35648 posts
Posted on 10/15/11 at 7:46 pm to
quote:

Well, they knew they had a winner and copied from the best.



that's Rambo's theme song. Pretty sure it's in every one.
Posted by Marciano1
Marksville, LA
Member since Jun 2009
19943 posts
Posted on 10/15/11 at 8:49 pm to
First Blood - better movie
Part II - most re-watchable
Posted by bulldog95
North Louisiana
Member since Jan 2011
21208 posts
Posted on 10/15/11 at 11:43 pm to
rambo part 4

arrow to heads of rebels making inmates run through water to step on mines=win

50 caliber gun slaughter end of movie=win
blowing up WWII era bomb in middle of jungle=win
fooling dogs smell with shirt strip from women that leads to WWII bomb mentioned above=win

stare down with mecenary leader=win
girl gives necklace'bracelet to rambo=win
kills the rebels on gunboat with pistol old western style=win

blowing up gunboat with 50 caliber gun=win

legs, arms, heads, exploding from 50 caliber gun=win

gutting rebel leader=win


SO #4 has more violence, gore, and a sexy woman also so I vote for #4. But if only between 1 & 2 then I pick the original.

Posted by T-BRO
Cleveland, TX
Member since Sep 2003
1644 posts
Posted on 10/16/11 at 10:20 am to
First Blood was a rip-off of a Dirk Benedict movie called "Ruckus".
Also had Linda Blair (exorcist girl) in it.
LINK
Posted by Al Bundy Bulldog
The Grindfather
Member since Dec 2010
36322 posts
Posted on 10/16/11 at 10:22 am to
Part 2 no question

Loved it when I was little
Posted by yakamein
Duluth, Michigan
Member since Sep 2011
277 posts
Posted on 10/16/11 at 11:35 am to
I was the first to respond to the OP. I have read all of the arguments through the thread and after reading it all my verdict is...

I prefer the original...
Posted by Hot Carl
Prayers up for 3
Member since Dec 2005
62247 posts
Posted on 10/16/11 at 1:51 pm to
quote:

I've always wondered how much of first blood part 2's screenplay written by James Cameron was changed by Sylvester Stallone when he rewrote it...how much better could part 2 have been if it was camerons


Probably no better. Dare I say Stallone is a better writer than Cameron?
Posted by SteveLSU35
Shreveport
Member since Mar 2004
14977 posts
Posted on 10/16/11 at 5:21 pm to
I prefer the original, and I have found that when women watch the first one they really enjoy it.
Posted by Cdawg
TigerFred's Living Room
Member since Sep 2003
61840 posts
Posted on 10/16/11 at 9:22 pm to
Screaming "Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaayyyyyyyyyyy" in helicopter = Win

Escaping a barrel of Napalm dropped from helicopter = win

Shooting an M-60 from the hip = win

Killing Russian commies in Vietnam = win

Killing ex VC commies in Vietnam = win

rescuing POW's from commies in Vietnam = win

Rambo going shirtless teh whole movie = no homo win

Only wants his country to love its soldiers as much as its soldiers love it = win
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram