Domain: tiger-web1.srvr.media3.us SCRUBS (2026) Premiere 2/25/26 | Page 4 | Movie/TV Board
Started By
Message

re: SCRUBS (2026) Premiere 2/25/26

Posted on 2/26/26 at 5:25 pm to
Posted by Gras Doux
Member since Feb 2026
359 posts
Posted on 2/26/26 at 5:25 pm to
quote:

I never watched this show all the way through. Just caught reruns every now and again. Should I binge watch the OG before starting this?



I would say yes. It has one of if not greatest series finales ever. The journey is so good. You will fall in love with every secondary character and background actor throughout the show. Really not a single bad character on this show.

Season 9 really isn't season 9. It's a spinoff by Bill Lawrence called Med School. Last second ABC got scared and called it scrubs season 9 and he couldn't do anything about it. After season 8 you can start on this revival.


quote:

Neauxla

Keep us posted when you start the series
This post was edited on 2/26/26 at 5:28 pm
Posted by Sl0thstronautEsq
Member since Aug 2018
17587 posts
Posted on 2/26/26 at 5:42 pm to
Just finished E2 and HOLY shite, they nailed it (so far).

Honestly, shocked at how good it is.
Posted by Gras Doux
Member since Feb 2026
359 posts
Posted on 2/26/26 at 6:08 pm to
quote:

Just finished E2 and HOLY shite, they nailed it (so far).

Honestly, shocked at how good it is.


Same

Dr Cox is coming back. Don't worry
Posted by LoveThatMoney
Who knows where?
Member since Jan 2008
12503 posts
Posted on 2/26/26 at 7:09 pm to
quote:

The other 2 things he said were sandwiched by disclaimers, making them just eyeroll inducing


But that’s the damn joke. Jesus. They’re laughing at how PC he has to be
Posted by Roaad
White Privilege Broker
Member since Aug 2006
82921 posts
Posted on 2/26/26 at 7:17 pm to
quote:

But that’s the damn joke. Jesus. They’re laughing at how PC he has to be
Jesus, I am aware. They damn near spell it out, ffs

I am saying it is cringe inducing and poorly done

hence the "eyeroll inducing"

Next you are going to tell me that Cox quit because he can't be PC enough. . .really blow my mind

This post was edited on 2/26/26 at 7:20 pm
Posted by Broski
Member since Jun 2011
80123 posts
Posted on 2/26/26 at 7:20 pm to
quote:

I am saying it is cringe inducing and poorly done



So, in your opinion, what wouldn't have been a poorly way to do it?
Posted by Roaad
White Privilege Broker
Member since Aug 2006
82921 posts
Posted on 2/26/26 at 7:20 pm to
quote:

So, in your opinion, what wouldn't have been a poorly way to do it?
better writing.

Better delivery would help, but the Todd has always had weak delivery
This post was edited on 2/26/26 at 7:22 pm
Posted by Broski
Member since Jun 2011
80123 posts
Posted on 2/26/26 at 7:23 pm to
quote:

but the Todd has always had weak delivery


So then what's the problem? That's who the Todd is and has always been.
Posted by Roaad
White Privilege Broker
Member since Aug 2006
82921 posts
Posted on 2/26/26 at 7:26 pm to
quote:

So then what's the problem?
LINK
Posted by Broski
Member since Jun 2011
80123 posts
Posted on 2/26/26 at 7:40 pm to
So the problem is that you just don't like Scrubs then?

Unless that is the case, you're not making much sense.
Posted by Roaad
White Privilege Broker
Member since Aug 2006
82921 posts
Posted on 2/26/26 at 7:50 pm to
quote:

So the problem is that you just don't like Scrubs
That only makes sense if your contention is that my problem is entirely with his delivery

I forgive his delivery, because of the actor's limitations

I call it the "Chris Klein conundrum"

But that is not what I said.

The writing for the scene was poor, and the setup surrounding it was weak.

So your theory is insufficient at best
Posted by Broski
Member since Jun 2011
80123 posts
Posted on 2/26/26 at 7:53 pm to
Now you're getting incredibly defensive


Regardless of your lashing out, these two episodes weren't in the pantheon of Scrubs episodes, but the writing unequivocally captured the spirit of the original run. If your problem is with the writing, your problem is with Scrubs.
Posted by Roaad
White Privilege Broker
Member since Aug 2006
82921 posts
Posted on 2/26/26 at 7:55 pm to
quote:

ow you're getting incredibly defensive


You are challenging my opinion, and asking me questions

You can't THEN say I am being defensive for responding.

That is retarded, in the kindest read. . .intentionally dishonest in the most practical read
This post was edited on 2/26/26 at 7:57 pm
Posted by Broski
Member since Jun 2011
80123 posts
Posted on 2/26/26 at 7:57 pm to
quote:

That is retarded, in the kindest read. . .intentionally dishonest in the most practical read


Claims intentional dishonesty in the challenge of his opinion, but doesn't even respond to the part of the post that actually challenged his opinion.

Irony is great, huh?
Posted by Roaad
White Privilege Broker
Member since Aug 2006
82921 posts
Posted on 2/26/26 at 7:59 pm to
quote:

laims intentional dishonesty in the challenge of his opinion,
JESUS CHRIST

Now you are being intentionally dishonest about what I called intentionally dishonest



Are you ok? This is seeming unhinged
Posted by Broski
Member since Jun 2011
80123 posts
Posted on 2/26/26 at 8:02 pm to
And the lashing out continues.

Why are you avoiding what I said?

You're not a Scrubs fan, that's fine.
Posted by Roaad
White Privilege Broker
Member since Aug 2006
82921 posts
Posted on 2/26/26 at 8:06 pm to
quote:

And the lashing out continues.

Wow

You are losing it, oumpkin

quote:

doesn't even respond to the part of the post that actually challenged his opinion.


quote:

I forgive his delivery, because of the actor's limitations

I call it the "Chris Klein conundrum"

But that is not what I said.

The writing for the scene was poor, and the setup surrounding it was weak.



Take your meds, my guy
Posted by Broski
Member since Jun 2011
80123 posts
Posted on 2/26/26 at 8:08 pm to
Still avoiding what I said and still lashing out. Playing the "I know you are but what am I?" card is actually cute.

Let me help you... respond to this:

quote:

Regardless of your lashing out, these two episodes weren't in the pantheon of Scrubs episodes, but the writing unequivocally captured the spirit of the original run. If your problem is with the writing, your problem is with Scrubs.



Posted by Roaad
White Privilege Broker
Member since Aug 2006
82921 posts
Posted on 2/26/26 at 8:11 pm to
quote:


Still avoiding what I said



Wooooooow

quote:

the writing unequivocally captured the spirit of the original run.
Obviously I disagree

Did you not understand that?
This post was edited on 2/26/26 at 8:13 pm
Posted by Broski
Member since Jun 2011
80123 posts
Posted on 2/26/26 at 8:12 pm to
Either you're an idiot or you think you actually responded to it in a previous answer. I guess that's why you linked it, but it didn't actually have anything to do with being a Scrub fan or not.

C'mon bud, I'm leading you to the water... drink it, don't drown in it.
Jump to page
Page First 2 3 4 5 6 ... 11
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 11Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram