Domain: tiger-web1.srvr.media3.us Sicario | Page 6 | Movie/TV Board
Started By
Message

re: Sicario

Posted on 5/21/25 at 12:29 pm to
Posted by DestrehanTiger
Houston, TX by way of Louisiana
Member since Nov 2005
13259 posts
Posted on 5/21/25 at 12:29 pm to
quote:

What makes you think Alejandro is done done and will return back to be an abogado again?


He was a lawyer in Mexico that completely changed his profession once his wife and daughter were brutally murdered. Maybe he stays on to help, but it is not inconceivable that he disappears after this (I understand there is a sequel).

quote:

Also, the US gave him the opportunity for that revenge. You think that his obligations and repayment ended there?


Even if he had obligations, it is strange that the foreign asset that the CIA brought in is the one that is getting a legal document signed. Again, it makes a lot more sense for this to be the concern of the CIA agent.
This post was edited on 5/21/25 at 12:38 pm
Posted by Lakeboy7
New Orleans
Member since Jul 2011
28324 posts
Posted on 5/21/25 at 12:30 pm to
quote:

She is needed on the mission because they need her agency on that mission




The CIA and Delta dont need some cheesedick FBI agent on an operational mission like that.

She was there only to make what they did legitimate or lawful. Incorporating a "clean" sister agency is a nice way to clean all that up.

The end of the movie tells you all that, he will blow her head off if she doesnt sign the memo that says in her opinion (FBI) things were done properly.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
471010 posts
Posted on 5/21/25 at 12:42 pm to
quote:

Even if he had obligations, it is strange that the foreign asset that the CIA brought in is the one that is getting a legal document signed. Again, it makes a lot more sense for this to be the concern of the CIA agent.

You think it's an optimal strategy for the CIA to send a known CIA agent to kill a federal LEO as opposed to someone who they have complete plausible deniability over (who works for the Colombian cartel on paper)?
Posted by DestrehanTiger
Houston, TX by way of Louisiana
Member since Nov 2005
13259 posts
Posted on 5/21/25 at 12:58 pm to
quote:

You think it's an optimal strategy for the CIA to send a known CIA agent to kill a federal LEO as opposed to someone who they have complete plausible deniability over (who works for the Colombian cartel on paper)?


I'm saying I don't understand why Alejandro gives a shite. They clearly show that he has a certain fondness for Kate. She reminds him of his daughter. Why would he care if the US government thinks the operation was legit enough to murder her? He already got what he wanted. I could see him murdering her just to get the chance for his revenge, but that carrot was already eaten.

Also, if the overall goal was to kill her, they could have done it way easier in Nogales. Alejandro was not sent there to kill Kate. He was sent there to get the signature. I get that he threatened to kill her and make it look like a suicide, but he would've just done that if that was the primary goal.
This post was edited on 5/21/25 at 1:00 pm
Posted by msap9020
Texas
Member since Feb 2015
2103 posts
Posted on 5/21/25 at 1:29 pm to
[
quote:

dont need some cheesedick FBI agent on an operational mission like that.


Platoon reset....
This post was edited on 5/21/25 at 1:30 pm
Posted by DownshiftAndFloorIt
Here
Member since Jan 2011
71590 posts
Posted on 5/21/25 at 2:37 pm to
quote:

He already accomplished what he was setting out to do for his revenge. Why did he care that the form was signed for the US government? it seems like Matt would have made more sense in that scene.


Yea, maybe so. I never really thought about that. I guess so Matt could maintain plausible deniability, and Alejandro is probably on the CIA payroll as well?
Posted by Roll Tide Ravens
Birmingham, AL
Member since Nov 2015
51374 posts
Posted on 5/21/25 at 2:46 pm to
quote:

She is needed on the mission because they need her agency on that mission.

They needed a member of the FBI involved because the CIA cannot operate independently on U.S. soil. That was her only purpose. She just decided to dig deeper and question things more than Graver and the CIA expected.
Posted by Roll Tide Ravens
Birmingham, AL
Member since Nov 2015
51374 posts
Posted on 5/21/25 at 2:49 pm to
quote:

I'm saying I don't understand why Alejandro gives a shite. They clearly show that he has a certain fondness for Kate. She reminds him of his daughter. Why would he care if the US government thinks the operation was legit enough to murder her?

I guess Alejandro's potential concern would be that, if the illegal actions of Graver and the CIA did become known, he would be implicated in it. We also know because of Day of the Saldado that he planned to keep his relationship with Graver and the CIA alive, even if after he got his revenge.
Posted by Pandy Fackler
Member since Jun 2018
21114 posts
Posted on 5/21/25 at 9:06 pm to
This might be in the thread already. It's a short vid explaining why Kate is the villian in the movie.

first pageprev pagePage 6 of 6Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram