- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: How far can a Ingram led team take us?
Posted on 6/13/23 at 3:00 pm to ThanosIsADemocrat
Posted on 6/13/23 at 3:00 pm to ThanosIsADemocrat
quote:KG was the best player on that team.
BI can definitely be as good as Paul Pierce. The #1 on a title team
quote:Are you saying BI can be as good as DWade?
And DWade the #1 on title team
1
Posted on 6/13/23 at 3:02 pm to ThanosIsADemocrat
quote:Hey, wanna ask me that question I already answered again?
The irony is not lost to the rest of the board when you type this. You should take a break
It amazes me how much you can screw up and pretend it's not there in the posts for us to see.
You got cocky thinking I was dodging your question but I had already answered it. It's ok to admit that fact.
This post was edited on 6/13/23 at 3:03 pm
Posted on 6/13/23 at 3:03 pm to shel311
quote:
KG was the best player on that team.
He wasn’t, but nice effort.
quote:
Are you saying BI can be as good as DWade?
Why can’t he? Specifically , what skills does he lack?
He’s an equal to or or better passer a better shooter, is taller and doesn’t rely on athleticism to play basketball. he can absolutely get to Dwades level.
Posted on 6/13/23 at 3:04 pm to ThanosIsADemocrat
quote:
He wasn’t
quote:Because DWade is all time great. BI has never ever ever shown that he can be all time great. It's not that difficult.
Why can’t he? Specifically , what skills does he lack?
quote:
he can absolutely get to Dwades level.
This post was edited on 6/13/23 at 3:05 pm
Posted on 6/13/23 at 3:07 pm to shel311
quote:
Because DWade is all time great. BI has never ever ever shown that he can be all time great. It's not that difficult.
So “because”. Poor effort.
Also, you didn’t answer the yes or no question regarding Luka finishing below the Pels, led by Ingram. So shall I ask again?
You have this thing where you lose, but you pretend you’re not. Maybe take a break.
Posted on 6/13/23 at 3:08 pm to ThanosIsADemocrat
quote:
So “because”. Poor effort.
quote:You're doing it AGAIN after I just told you? LOL
Also, you didn’t answer the yes or no question regarding Luka finishing below the Pels, led by Ingram. So shall I ask again?
I answered it, holy shite, you gotta start reading threads, man. You HAVE to do better, you can't get much worse than what you're doing right now.
quote:
You have this thing where you lose, but you pretend you’re not. Maybe take a break.
This post was edited on 6/13/23 at 3:10 pm
Posted on 6/13/23 at 3:12 pm to shel311
You haven’t answered it once.
That’s not an answer to a yes or no question.
You need to start reading your own answers. Just typing nonsense isn’t working for you.
Poor effort all around today.
quote:
quote: Luka finished below Ingrams team. Is he not a number #1? What else has Luka done over, as I've stated to you multiple times, a representative sample size? What's the answer? Is it more than BI, yes or no?
That’s not an answer to a yes or no question.
You need to start reading your own answers. Just typing nonsense isn’t working for you.
Poor effort all around today.
Posted on 6/13/23 at 3:14 pm to ThanosIsADemocrat
Bro just give up on shell. The dude loves CJ to death. He argues ridiculous points and inaccurate analogies. Then literally cuts part of your argument and not the whole thing, pastes it and responds back trying to make himself win the argument. The dude didn’t even realize lakers gave up a first in the westbrook trade. Honestly, not worth arguing with someone like that.
Posted on 6/13/23 at 3:18 pm to Pels_Yaz
quote:
Bro just give up on shell. The dude loves CJ to death. He argues ridiculous points and inaccurate analogies. Then literally cuts part of your argument and not the whole thing, pastes it and responds back trying to make himself win the argument. The dude didn’t even realize lakers gave up a first in the westbrook trade. Honestly, not worth arguing with someone like that.
You have to give the hall monitors a swirlie every now then. Most of those guys don’t know how to debate, but insist on themselves. It’s amusing me while my son is in the pool. On his behalf, he’s average on nba knowledge, he just doesn’t get what makes a winner.
Posted on 6/13/23 at 3:22 pm to ThanosIsADemocrat
quote:
You haven’t answered it once.
Do better
Still wondering when you realize the Luka Mavs were better than the Pelicans with BI but no Zion...just waiting for you to get there and catch up to me.
Are you there yet?
You seem to think BI led us to the playoffs, but ignore it was Zion that led us to the 1st seed largely without BI, and BI couldn't keep us winning like that.
But again, the BI Pels were worse than the Luka Mavs so what point do you think you're making with that comparison?
Posted on 6/13/23 at 3:22 pm to Pels_Yaz
quote:
Bro just give up on shell. The dude loves CJ to death. He argues ridiculous points and inaccurate analogies. Then literally cuts part of your argument and not the whole thing, pastes it and responds back trying to make himself win the argument. The dude didn’t even realize lakers gave up a first in the westbrook trade. Honestly, not worth arguing with someone like that.
Posted on 6/13/23 at 3:24 pm to ThanosIsADemocrat
quote:
Most of those guys don’t know how to debate
quote:Oops, swing and a miss!
Also, you didn’t answer the yes or no question regarding Luka finishing below the Pels, led by Ingram. So shall I ask again?
quote:
On his behalf, he’s average on nba knowledge
quote:Oops, swing and a miss!
Also, you didn’t answer the yes or no question regarding Luka finishing below the Pels, led by Ingram. So shall I ask again?
Posted on 6/13/23 at 3:28 pm to shel311
quote:
Still wondering when you realize the Luka Mavs were better than the Pelicans with BI but no Zion...just waiting for you to get there and catch up to me. Are you there yet?
Did Lukas team fall behind the Pels after BI came back? Yes or no?
We are all waiting on you.
Posted on 6/13/23 at 3:29 pm to shel311
quote:
Oops, swing and a miss!
Speaking of muddying up the board…maybe take a break?
Posted on 6/13/23 at 3:31 pm to ThanosIsADemocrat
quote:Zion without BI: 10-7
Did Lukas team fall behind the Pels after BI came back? Yes or no?
We are all waiting on you.
BI without Zion: 16-17
Luka: 33-33
quote:Oops, swing and a miss.
Speaking of muddying up the board…maybe take a break?
So let's here your excuse for BI having the worst record of the 3....go!!!
This post was edited on 6/13/23 at 3:32 pm
Posted on 6/13/23 at 3:35 pm to shel311
You gotta watch the games, not basketball reference.
Tatum is disgustingly mid 80% of the time.
You need a middy come playoff time and he refuses to shoot them. The reason why the Celtics didn’t get to the finals was bc they just heat checked 3’s all playoffs. It was disgusting. They have a really talented team, but they play incredibly low IQ basketball, and that starts with Tatum and Brown.
We’d wipe the floor with them in a 7 game series if we were ever healthy.
Tatum is disgustingly mid 80% of the time.
You need a middy come playoff time and he refuses to shoot them. The reason why the Celtics didn’t get to the finals was bc they just heat checked 3’s all playoffs. It was disgusting. They have a really talented team, but they play incredibly low IQ basketball, and that starts with Tatum and Brown.
We’d wipe the floor with them in a 7 game series if we were ever healthy.
Posted on 6/13/23 at 3:37 pm to 3PieceSpicy
Bro no we wouldn’t. You think we would beat the celtics in a 7 game series?
Posted on 6/13/23 at 3:40 pm to shel311
quote:
Oops, swing and a miss
Dang Shel, thought you let this go. Quick refresher, Basketball is played with 5 on the court, not 1. Your correlations are statistically irrelevant.
Posted on 6/13/23 at 3:41 pm to Pistol44
quote:They are based on the specifics of the question he asked, certainly.
Dang Shel, thought you let this go. Quick refresher, Basketball is played with 5 on the court, not 1. Your correlations are statistically irrelevant.
He assumed BI's team without Zion was better than Luka's team and asked a question based on that, but he was wrong....so how would that not be relevant if he's asking a question based on literal factually incorrect data?
This post was edited on 6/13/23 at 3:45 pm
Posted on 6/13/23 at 3:53 pm to shel311
quote:
Oops, swing and a miss. So let's here your excuse for BI having the worst record of the 3....go!!!
This is what you don’t get.
BIs replacement is a far better player than Zions replacement, despite the ample opportunities Zion has given them.
There is a gaping hole at the 4.
Now, Luka fell behind Ingram, so he’s not a #1 correct? Despite having at worst an equal #2, right?
Page 5 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News