Domain: tiger-web1.srvr.media3.us Saints Draft Thread: Updates inside | Page 73 | Saints Talk
Started By
Message

re: Saints Draft Thread: Updates inside

Posted on 4/27/17 at 11:02 pm to
Posted by DupontsCircle
Dupont Circle
Member since Jun 2016
5823 posts
Posted on 4/27/17 at 11:02 pm to
We won't miss him. I have more faith in Lattimore and that ain't that much. Sorry. I don't trust our track record with CBs. Call me superstitious if you will.
Posted by Cypdog
Member since Jan 2014
855 posts
Posted on 4/27/17 at 11:03 pm to
Fair
Posted by Methuselah
On da Riva
Member since Jan 2005
23350 posts
Posted on 4/27/17 at 11:04 pm to
Hopefully this OT will play lights out. It just seems with our D ranked so low (weren't we last?) and our O ranked pretty high I'm not sure how much thi pick will move the needle.
Posted by LosLobos111
Austere
Member since Feb 2011
45385 posts
Posted on 4/27/17 at 11:04 pm to
Understood

I think after the woes they have to swing for an elite prospect for the backfield
Posted by Brisket
Over dere
Member since Dec 2009
933 posts
Posted on 4/27/17 at 11:05 pm to
quote:

it wouldn't shock me one bit if he quits after a couple of years.


WTF kind of drugs do you people take in here? Where on earth do you get this crazy idea. Hallucinate much?
Posted by LosLobos111
Austere
Member since Feb 2011
45385 posts
Posted on 4/27/17 at 11:06 pm to
Weren't last

I listed like 10 pass rushers that are in the same bubble who'll be available at 42 and even 76.

Posted by ellishughtiger
70118
Member since Jul 2004
21182 posts
Posted on 4/27/17 at 11:21 pm to
Any chance Lattimore may see some kick and punt return time. I saw he ran a 4.36 40
Posted by jamal
Places Unknown
Member since Jan 2013
12980 posts
Posted on 4/27/17 at 11:22 pm to
Doubt it. No experience I believe and we gotta watch his Hamstring
Posted by adamb2151
Houston, Texas
Member since Jun 2013
6586 posts
Posted on 4/27/17 at 11:53 pm to
The O doesn't continue to win games for you if you don't continue to add pieces to keep it functional.
Posted by Hazelnut
Member since May 2011
16466 posts
Posted on 4/28/17 at 12:02 am to
Yeah I've seen our team with a subpar O line and I really don't want to go back to that. I just can't knock drafting a o lineman. Especially given the position we were in and what was available
This post was edited on 4/28/17 at 12:03 am
Posted by WicKed WayZ
Louisiana Forever
Member since Sep 2011
33782 posts
Posted on 4/28/17 at 12:13 am to
It was the right move. Hell, he might overtake Strief by midseason. You never know. Regardless, he will be a starting right tackle for us in the future, one way or another

So, in essence, we got 2 starters in the first round. Can't ask for much more
Posted by JabarkusRussell
Member since Jul 2009
15825 posts
Posted on 4/28/17 at 12:14 am to
Spoilers? This isn't a movie. Do you bitch about spoilers during the Olympics or want the news live? I'll post Twitter leaks tomorrow just for you. That concerned stay off the internet.
This post was edited on 4/28/17 at 12:16 am
Posted by saintsfan1977
Arkansas, from Cajun country
Member since Jun 2010
10148 posts
Posted on 4/28/17 at 3:08 am to
quote:

It just seems with our D ranked so low (weren't we last?)


Thats what happens when you lose half your starting defense and all of your secondary in week 3.
Posted by BallHawk
Orlando
Member since Jul 2011
6061 posts
Posted on 4/28/17 at 4:18 am to
No I'm not concerned but plenty of posters are and like watching picks live. God forbid people have courtesy and don't ruin experiences for others.
Posted by BallHawk
Orlando
Member since Jul 2011
6061 posts
Posted on 4/28/17 at 5:20 am to
quote:

So future OL will have two studs at tackle, a Pro Bowl Center, and hopefully a continually improving Peat at G. I'll take it.


Don't forget a solid starter in Warford. Shaping up to be very good for the next 5 years
Posted by Lilpickles
Member since Nov 2016
1701 posts
Posted on 4/28/17 at 6:26 am to
Not knocking it, the question is could they have taken the OL at 42 or later?
Posted by goatmilker
Castle Anthrax
Member since Feb 2009
74926 posts
Posted on 4/28/17 at 6:39 am to
quote:

the question is could they have taken the OL at 42 or later?


What would have stopped them?
Posted by Lilpickles
Member since Nov 2016
1701 posts
Posted on 4/28/17 at 7:33 am to
And take a DE at 32.....
Posted by The Sad Banana
The gate is narrow.
Member since Jul 2008
89507 posts
Posted on 4/28/17 at 7:59 am to
Sean Payton has said that there was a big gap between Ramczyk and the pack and it makes sense for them to pick him at 32. The draft isn't over. There is a lot of value to be had at pick 42.

Calm down you dummy know it alls. (not directed at you, goat)
This post was edited on 4/28/17 at 8:00 am
Posted by jpcedotal
Member since Apr 2017
43 posts
Posted on 4/28/17 at 9:39 am to
Should be another good CB available at 42.
Jump to page
Page First 71 72 73 74 75 ... 115
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 73 of 115Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram