- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 7/5/16 at 11:17 pm to The Pirate King
quote:
"Gun, he's got a gun" "hey bro don't you fricking move"
Moves toward gun, gets shot.
Facebook vid.....officer is clearly shouting "he's going to his pocket "
Cop then warns the perp again....perp is still non-compliant and gets several to the chest.
Good shoot.
Posted on 7/5/16 at 11:17 pm to The Pirate King
Two cops all over me like that, I'm throwing my hands in the air like I just don't care.
Want to fight with cops? You'll have a high probability of getting beat up or killed.
All convicted felons know this.
The question now is, and we'll never know the answer, why?
a) Heat of the moment, emotional decision
b) Suicide by cop
c) Really thought he could take the cops
d) Panicked
e) Mental illness
f) Drugs/Alcohol
g) Some combination of the above
Want to fight with cops? You'll have a high probability of getting beat up or killed.
All convicted felons know this.
The question now is, and we'll never know the answer, why?
a) Heat of the moment, emotional decision
b) Suicide by cop
c) Really thought he could take the cops
d) Panicked
e) Mental illness
f) Drugs/Alcohol
g) Some combination of the above
Posted on 7/5/16 at 11:18 pm to Ibleedblackandgold
quote:Yeah, people get such a fair shake in court
the court system exist for you to state a case
Posted on 7/5/16 at 11:19 pm to JayDeerTay84
quote:
Ah. Another case were one simply had to comply to live.
Non compliance isn't a reason to be shot. I certainly wish he had complied and none of this would have happened.
Hopefully one of the other videos will be clearer on whether or not he actually did reach for his gun. If not this will become a shitshow
Posted on 7/5/16 at 11:23 pm to Cap Crunch
He should've used his Baton.
Posted on 7/5/16 at 11:23 pm to crkelly91
Looks like the police officer was definitely out of line. Looks like murder.
However, the video of the riots looks like people are having fun. Seems weird.
However, the video of the riots looks like people are having fun. Seems weird.
Posted on 7/5/16 at 11:24 pm to slackster
quote:
I'm not disputing any of this. Never have.
So then you are defending a man with a gun who is resisting arrest after being tazed twice and tackled by 2 cops?
Why is your requirement to use deadly force that a person be reaching for a gun? If he has a gun and he gains control of the police officer, the officer is dead. Or if he simply gains control of the officer he can use their weapon against them. Do you realize how quickly that situation can get out of control when 3 people are wrestling on the ground?
That is why it is so important that you comply with the request of an officer. ESPECIALLY if you are armed.
Posted on 7/5/16 at 11:24 pm to WaWaWeeWa
This. Why on earth would the cops shoot the guy if he wasn't going for his gun? The cops discover the fact that CD Dawg has a gun, cops tell him not to go for gun, CD Dawg moves his arm towards said gun. Police have a reasonable fear for their lives when CD Dawg goes for weapon and they respond with deadly force. Case closed.
BUT, the retards in NBR lead by the retard Gary Chambers will probably riot and shite for the next few days. It's so strange. There is clear evidence that CD man clearly went for the gun. Enough said.
During the next few days, if you're white and driving around a shitty neighborhood, i.e. anywhere in Baton Rouge, stay strapped and vigilant.
BUT, the retards in NBR lead by the retard Gary Chambers will probably riot and shite for the next few days. It's so strange. There is clear evidence that CD man clearly went for the gun. Enough said.
During the next few days, if you're white and driving around a shitty neighborhood, i.e. anywhere in Baton Rouge, stay strapped and vigilant.
quote:
You need to watch the clearer video on Facebook. It's clear that he is on his back and continues to struggle with both of the officers trying to hold him down.
You are getting too caught up in thinking "did his hand slide down and reach for the gun"
It's very simple. Just state the facts:
- cops think man has a gun
- refuses to comply
- gets tazed twice. Still doesn't comply
- is on the ground resisting arrest and 2 cops can't control him
- cops see what they think is a gun and he is still resisting arrest after being told not to move
- he gets shot
Those are the very clear facts from the video. You can't dispute them
Posted on 7/5/16 at 11:25 pm to cas4t
quote:
Yea there is nothing clear about that video, at all,
That is my point. That is the point about the whole ordeal. People have a preconceived notion as to what happened depending on their bias. They see the video and only see what they want in order to draw the "clear" conclusions they need to support their side.
Cops could be right or wrong but that video doesn't prove anything one way or the other. I wish it did, but it doesn't. You can hear the cops plainly but you cannot see anything happening.
Posted on 7/5/16 at 11:25 pm to adp
Well, they did taze the guy twice and that didn't stop him. It'd be great if we saw more use of non lethal ways to subdue criminals, but if he was actually reaching for a gun, the cops had no choice.
Once again, we have to wait for all of the evidence to come out before we decide if the cops were in the right
Once again, we have to wait for all of the evidence to come out before we decide if the cops were in the right
Posted on 7/5/16 at 11:26 pm to adp
Hope you're joking.
Just in case you're not. A taser is way more affective than a baton
You don't answer threat of a gun with an impact weapon. You don't respond to threat of deadly force with a compliance tool
Just in case you're not. A taser is way more affective than a baton
You don't answer threat of a gun with an impact weapon. You don't respond to threat of deadly force with a compliance tool
Posted on 7/5/16 at 11:26 pm to slackster
oh i bet the guy who got shot was a contributing member of society who dindu nuffin
Posted on 7/5/16 at 11:28 pm to Jim Smith
quote:
Why on earth would the cops shoot the guy if he wasn't going for his gun? The cops discover the fact that CD Dawg has a gun, cops tell him not to go for gun, CD Dawg moves his arm towards said gun. Police have a reasonable fear for their lives when CD Dawg goes for weapon and they respond with deadly force. Case closed.
BUT, the retards in NBR lead by the retard Gary Chambers will probably riot and shite for the next few days. It's so strange. There is clear evidence that CD man clearly went for the gun. Enough said.
This is exhibit A in support of the argument that people see what they want. You cannot imagine why on earth the cops would shoot the guy if he wasn't going for his gun, but I can just as easily suggest that there is no valid reason for the guy to go for his gun when he's on the ground with two cops on top of him. You don't have the ability to see anything from any other viewpoint if you see that video and think ANYTHING is clear.
Posted on 7/5/16 at 11:30 pm to LurkingTigers
quote:
It's just as bad on Twitter... The best part is you can tell most of them didn't even watch the video.. Really sad how stupid people are. It's one thing to disagree with it.. It's another to completely make up shite..
The hashtag with his name on it has no variety of opinions whatsoever. How can everyone commenting on Twitter agree on a conclusion so quickly without all the evidence yet?
Posted on 7/5/16 at 11:30 pm to crkelly91
I'm usually on the cops' side in these thing but that looks really bad
Posted on 7/5/16 at 11:31 pm to slackster
quote:
Cops could be right or wrong but that video doesn't prove anything one way or the other. I wish it did, but it doesn't. You can hear the cops plainly but you cannot see anything happening.
What? YOUR bias is confusing you
The only disputed evidence is:
- He got tazed twice (which multiple witness are confirming, not just the cops)
- He had a gun (again multiple witnesses are confirming and the police state that in the video)
You don't need anymore facts to come to the conclusions that the cops were justified
He had a gun and was on the ground resisting arrest after 2 attempts to use non deadly force were unsuccessful. Sorry you don't like it, but deadly force is justified. And I think most people would agree with that.
Posted on 7/5/16 at 11:31 pm to WaWaWeeWa
quote:
So then you are defending a man with a gun who is resisting arrest after being tazed twice and tackled by 2 cops?
I'm not defending him. I'm defending the assertion that he got what he deserved and/or that these cops deserve a promotion. They did what they had to do and I'm not suggesting otherwise, but people want this to be a good thing and it simply isn't. The guy is likely 100% at fault for his death, but it doesn't mean he deserved to die nor should it be celebrated. I don't believe the cops had any other choice in this situation.
Posted on 7/5/16 at 11:33 pm to slackster
quote:
I've watched the video multiple times. No possible way you can suggest he slides his right arm down. You can hardly even tell if he is on his back or his face.
There's nothing conclusive. Anyone saying so is extremely biased.
Posted on 7/5/16 at 11:34 pm to slackster
I don't necessarily think having a gun justifies shooting him in this instance either. He looked restrained to me. Point blank in the chest like that is pretty gruesome. But then again if you think your life is in danger...
I do worry though that an officer is capable of getting away with murder or a wrongful shooting as long as he proclaims the perp has a gun, whether he does or not.
I do worry though that an officer is capable of getting away with murder or a wrongful shooting as long as he proclaims the perp has a gun, whether he does or not.
Popular
Back to top



1





