Domain: tiger-web1.srvr.media3.us Another one... Pit Bull Kills 3-year-old | Page 7 | O-T Lounge
Started By
Message

re: Another one... Pit Bull Kills 3-year-old

Posted on 4/1/14 at 10:36 am to
Posted by TDsngumbo
Member since Oct 2011
49810 posts
Posted on 4/1/14 at 10:36 am to
quote:

It is shocking that all you have to do is change the word pit bull to fire arm and all of these anti-pit bull comments would be just as valid...

Not really.
A pitbull is known to be a violent breed that turns in a second.
A firearm requires a human to pull its trigger. Either intentionally or accidentally. Either way, firearms require a great deal of responsibility (especially if children are around). Firearms can be controlled.
The only way to control a pitbull is with a firearm.
Posted by Darth_Vader
A galaxy far, far away
Member since Dec 2011
72763 posts
Posted on 4/1/14 at 10:36 am to
quote:

You realize that for some reason Super trashy, super ghetto, and super violent subsets just happen to love this bread right.... I would bet the bank that if things changed over night and these people I'm talking about, in bizaro world, would decide that their new favorite breed was say Labs, I would bet it wouldn't be long before the stats got skewed where majority of attacks and whatnot were done by "Labradors"....... It's just unfortunate that these fricking trash balls ruin it for the responsible dog owners and ruin it for the poor breed



Tell you what, you show me the stats where only Pits owned by white or ghetto trash attack and kill children while Pits owned by wealthy intelligent people are no risk to anyone, and I'll change my stance on Pits.

bottom line is this notion that it's all the owners fault and had nothing to do with the breed is pure bullshite. Yes, the owners have responsibility.

But the fact still remains this breed is far and away more dangerous than all other breeds of dogs.

The fact remains that time and again there are Pits who their owners describe as "sweet, loving, and great with kids and other dogs" only to one day have that sweet loving dog rip the throat out of a 4 year old girl or the neighbor's golden retriever.

The bottom line FACT about this dog that you nor any other Pit owner can get around is they kill on a regular basis. They kill other dogs, they kill elderly people, and they kill children. And they kill in numbers far and away higher than all other breeds combined.
Posted by TDsngumbo
Member since Oct 2011
49810 posts
Posted on 4/1/14 at 10:36 am to
quote:

You would discharge a firearm in a neighborhood where children are just because a dog is in your yard? My gosh.

I don't miss.
Posted by ATXTiger1
Austin
Member since Feb 2009
3296 posts
Posted on 4/1/14 at 10:37 am to
quote:

Guns serve a purpose and don't have a mind of their own


Pit Bulls, and all other dogs, serve a purpose. Guns still cause way more deaths from even though the owner is a "responsible gun owner".
Posted by Topwater Trout
Red Stick
Member since Oct 2010
69681 posts
Posted on 4/1/14 at 10:38 am to
quote:

I would bet the bank that if things changed over night and these people I'm talking about, in bizaro world, would decide that their new favorite breed was say Labs, I would bet it wouldn't be long before the stats got skewed where majority of attacks and whatnot were done by "Labradors


Labs led all breeds in attacks a few years ago (off the top of my head). They are also the most common breed.
Posted by HeadyBrosevelt
the Verde River
Member since Jan 2013
21591 posts
Posted on 4/1/14 at 10:38 am to
I love how all pit bull owners think it is a conspiracy by the media to make their dogs look like thugs.
Posted by Napoleon
Kenna
Member since Dec 2007
73710 posts
Posted on 4/1/14 at 10:38 am to
quote:

My opinion is based off real life experience, and I have seen three pitbull attacks (two to my own dog) and 0 (zero) by any other breed. Combine that with all the news you hear and I have no sympathy whatsoever for that breed. I agree with cities like Denver banning them.


Good thing the opinion of a troll has no sway anywhere. How is that pool in the arena doing btw?

I have owned one and it was a great dog, really friendly and not mean at all. I raised it from a pup. I have seen many pits and knew mean ones and nice ones. The meanest dogs I ever had were pedigree Labradors. They were brothers and fought all the time. Had to get rid of both.

Also basically any mutt with a big head or a wide nose is considered a Pit Bull. When most aren't.
Posted by Croacka
Denham Springs
Member since Dec 2008
61451 posts
Posted on 4/1/14 at 10:39 am to
Tell me what purpose a pit serves that's unique to the breed?

There are also way more guns than pits and I don't think that many guns of responsible owners kill other people


Good try though
Posted by TDsngumbo
Member since Oct 2011
49810 posts
Posted on 4/1/14 at 10:39 am to
quote:

Labs led all breeds in attacks a few years ago (off the top of my head). They are also the most common breed.

All deadly attacks or just attacks in general?
Posted by ATXTiger1
Austin
Member since Feb 2009
3296 posts
Posted on 4/1/14 at 10:39 am to
quote:

A pitbull is known to be a violent breed that turns in a second.

Only to ignorant people who don't know what they are talking about.
quote:

Firearms can be controlled.

Well people don't seem to control them very well...
quote:

The only way to control a pitbull is with a firearm.

Posted by SabiDojo
Open to any suggestions.
Member since Nov 2010
84394 posts
Posted on 4/1/14 at 10:39 am to
quote:

I don't miss.


Just be sure you don't.
Posted by Napoleon
Kenna
Member since Dec 2007
73710 posts
Posted on 4/1/14 at 10:39 am to
quote:

While we are banning Pit Bulls, lets ban all guns. 100's of children die each year from accidental deaths involving firearms. The only people that own firearms are Thug POS and White Trash POS.

It is shocking that all you have to do is change the word pit bull to fire arm and all of these anti-pit bull comments would be just as valid...


Posted by tidalmouse
Whatsamotta U.
Member since Jan 2009
30706 posts
Posted on 4/1/14 at 10:40 am to
I've never even had a friend that owned a Pit So I don't think I've ever had the opportunity to pet one or see it interact with it's owner.

If I'd ever been around them I might feel differently.

I'm not for the extermination of them.Just something to keep little kids from getting killed.
Posted by maisweh
Member since Jan 2014
4222 posts
Posted on 4/1/14 at 10:40 am to
i've posted it before, but lets try it again and see if anyone actually looks at it

LINK

So, what exactly is a "pit bull?" Nobody really knows. The United Kennel Club lists American Pit Bull Terriers as an official breed, but the American Kennel Club doesn't. It only lists a related breed: the American Staffordshire Terrier

Posted by 3rdRowTailgater
Tulsa
Member since Jul 2006
18860 posts
Posted on 4/1/14 at 10:41 am to
quote:

The fact remains that time and again there are Pits who their owners describe as "sweet, loving, and great with kids and other dogs" only to one day have that sweet loving dog rip the throat out of a 4 year old girl or the neighbor's golden retriever.


So it doesn't matter that my dog, nor any of my friend's who have owned pits have ever had any problems with the breed? Just because some shite owners that breed and train dogs for fighting, keep them chained up and mistreat them have created problems with the breed doesn't mean that the breed should be outlawed or exterminated.
Posted by ATXTiger1
Austin
Member since Feb 2009
3296 posts
Posted on 4/1/14 at 10:41 am to
quote:

I don't think that many guns of responsible owners kill other people


I agree, and I don't think that many pit bulls from responsible owners kill people.
Posted by Darth_Vader
A galaxy far, far away
Member since Dec 2011
72763 posts
Posted on 4/1/14 at 10:41 am to
quote:

Pit Bulls, and all other dogs, serve a purpose. Guns still cause way more deaths from even though the owner is a "responsible gun owner".


I'll buy into your logic just as soon as a gun grabs a child, drags it into it's case, and kills the child.
Posted by PoppaD
Texas
Member since Feb 2008
5347 posts
Posted on 4/1/14 at 10:41 am to
quote:

I would bet the bank that if things changed over night and these people I'm talking about, in bizaro world, would decide that their new favorite breed was say Labs, I would bet it wouldn't be long before the stats got skewed where majority of attacks and whatnot were done by "Labradors


As a owner of a lab for most of my life I gotta call some bs on this. It takes a whole lot more for a lab to first attack and then for a lab to kill then it takes a Pitt. A lab would attack if provoked and was scared. It would kill if really scared.

However the Pitt in this story was chilling in a cage, was not provoked, saw a kid he has probably seen many times and maybe even played with, and decided to break down the gate holding him and kill the kid. I've never heard of a lab of any type doing that.
Posted by Camo Tiger 337
Lake Charles
Member since Jan 2014
2102 posts
Posted on 4/1/14 at 10:42 am to
What is it about these threads that bring the people out like this. shite gets crazy over here when we get a pit bull attack thread.
Posted by HeadyBrosevelt
the Verde River
Member since Jan 2013
21591 posts
Posted on 4/1/14 at 10:42 am to
Pit bulls are the only breed that constantly need to be defended by their owners. I think there is a reason for that.

Pit bull owners = delusional trash

A strange phenomenon is when a hot girl in her 20s gets a pitbull because they are "misunderstood." I have seen this scenario end tragically more than once.
This post was edited on 4/1/14 at 10:42 am
Jump to page
Page First 5 6 7 8 9 ... 23
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 7 of 23Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram