- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Arguments and Contradictions
Posted on 2/28/26 at 10:43 pm to OWLFAN86
Posted on 2/28/26 at 10:43 pm to OWLFAN86
I’m not Catholic. But I am a member on the one true, holy, catholic, and apostolic Church.
I’m sure you will have no idea what I’m talking about because all Protestants lack an understanding of Church history.
I’m sure you will have no idea what I’m talking about because all Protestants lack an understanding of Church history.
Posted on 2/28/26 at 10:46 pm to OWLFAN86
quote:Big fan. He wasn't trying to build a denomination -- he was trying to explain and defend "mere Christianity" which probably did more to unify Christians around essentials than most internet debates ever will.
C.S. Lewis?
Posted on 2/28/26 at 10:47 pm to Uga Alum
I love the Eastern Orthodox
Greek or Russian?
or perhaps a dirty Slav?
Greek or Russian?
or perhaps a dirty Slav?
Posted on 2/28/26 at 10:49 pm to RoyalWe
I am also a huge fan
Screwtape letters is still one of my favorites
Ive posted this channel here previously
Screwtape letters is still one of my favorites
Ive posted this channel here previously
Posted on 2/28/26 at 10:52 pm to Uga Alum
quote:My brother in Christ, I pray we both grow in humility and speak with charity toward those we disagree with.
I’m sure you will have no idea what I’m talking about because all Protestants lack an understanding of Church history.
Posted on 2/28/26 at 10:52 pm to Pedro
quote:I didn't vote for you.
Pedro
Posted on 2/28/26 at 10:55 pm to RoyalWe
I always am always an eager participant in theology threads
and although I still maintain my playful attitude in my discussions, I am more than happy to have a serious conversation. I doubt our brother has the spiritual maturity
he should read Colossians 3:16
and although I still maintain my playful attitude in my discussions, I am more than happy to have a serious conversation. I doubt our brother has the spiritual maturity
he should read Colossians 3:16
Posted on 2/28/26 at 11:00 pm to OWLFAN86
It's all good. I enjoy them myself and only recently decided to participate in them, trying to steer them toward actual discussion without the ad hominem. I fail sometimes. I wonder when Christians attack other Christians where they're coming from. I don't mind disagreements, but name-calling doesn't help anyone and seems a bit ironic to be using in a Christian discussion.
Posted on 2/28/26 at 11:02 pm to RoyalWe
I believe the old testament are parables and its not to be taken literal.
Posted on 2/28/26 at 11:04 pm to OWLFAN86
OWL, you have pull around here. You think you can lobby to get me one one thread a week (to start one thread a week)?
Posted on 2/28/26 at 11:07 pm to RoyalWe
Well one it's the OT, so just by environmental influences, it's gonna be difficult to have a serious discussion about theology on this board
and B
As mentioned I've always taken great interest in theology and even considered it being my major I had two uncles who had doctorates of theology, one of them was the one who introduced me to CS Lewis
But I remember a discussion in a class where just as discussion we came to the conclusion that perhaps all the different denominations were that God knew that as the world expanded the message was going to have to make allowances for times in human history and that the Catholic Church and then subsequently the Eastern Orthodox Church served best at establishing THE FAITH In what was then the remnants of the Roman and Greek empires the homes of the Cathlic and Orthadox
Western Civilization progressed as we had continuous splits over a verse or two the message while drifting from the messenger, Christ.
and B
As mentioned I've always taken great interest in theology and even considered it being my major I had two uncles who had doctorates of theology, one of them was the one who introduced me to CS Lewis
But I remember a discussion in a class where just as discussion we came to the conclusion that perhaps all the different denominations were that God knew that as the world expanded the message was going to have to make allowances for times in human history and that the Catholic Church and then subsequently the Eastern Orthodox Church served best at establishing THE FAITH In what was then the remnants of the Roman and Greek empires the homes of the Cathlic and Orthadox
Western Civilization progressed as we had continuous splits over a verse or two the message while drifting from the messenger, Christ.
Posted on 2/28/26 at 11:30 pm to OweO
jesus... chris we were having a good conversation til you showed up
Posted on 3/1/26 at 12:29 am to Uga Alum
There have long been charismatic Catholics. Often ascetic monks have shenanigans comparable to holy floor rollers.
I think both are condemnable.
I think both are condemnable.
Posted on 3/1/26 at 12:35 am to Uga Alum
It far has less to do with sola scriptura and far more to do with:
The utilization of local political forces to throw off a corrupt Catholic Church expositing too much authority in the 15th century which ultimately led to a shift in ecclesiastical authority from a top-down episcopal system to other ecclesiological theories.
Further, you can’t sweep the wide branches that have formed in Christianity in the 1,400 years prior to the reformation. Copts, Armenian orthodox, Alexandrine and Antiochene churches, etc. I don’t agree with them either, but when we talk about early Christianity, it is quite an overstatement to presume it was ever completely unified.
David Litwa (who is wrong about so much) has done a good job explaining the existence of “early christianities” instead of an “early Christianity.”
The utilization of local political forces to throw off a corrupt Catholic Church expositing too much authority in the 15th century which ultimately led to a shift in ecclesiastical authority from a top-down episcopal system to other ecclesiological theories.
Further, you can’t sweep the wide branches that have formed in Christianity in the 1,400 years prior to the reformation. Copts, Armenian orthodox, Alexandrine and Antiochene churches, etc. I don’t agree with them either, but when we talk about early Christianity, it is quite an overstatement to presume it was ever completely unified.
David Litwa (who is wrong about so much) has done a good job explaining the existence of “early christianities” instead of an “early Christianity.”
Posted on 3/1/26 at 12:50 am to nbhnc
Boom
early Christianity was tribal as was the communities the message spread to
The church fit what progressed civilization
Including the inquisition
early Christianity was tribal as was the communities the message spread to
The church fit what progressed civilization
Including the inquisition
Posted on 3/1/26 at 8:04 am to Uga Alum
quote:
I’m sorry, do you not attend churches where the pastors can afford their own private jets and people will just randomly flop on the floor like a fish and claim that they are speaking in tongues? Do any other churches besides Protestant churches provide experiences like that?
Out of curiosity, does the Pope fly commercial?
Posted on 3/1/26 at 8:35 am to Lonnie Utah
quote:Matthew 7:3-5 comes to mind.
Out of curiosity, does the Pope fly commercial?
3 “And why worry about a speck in your friend’s eye when you have a log in your own? 4 How can you think of saying to your friend, ‘Let me help you get rid of that speck in your eye,’ when you can’t see past the log in your own eye? 5 Hypocrite! First get rid of the log in your own eye; then you will see well enough to deal with the speck in your friend’s eye.
Popular
Back to top


2







