- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Facts from district attorney (Georgia shooting)
Posted on 5/9/20 at 10:16 am to the LSUSaint
Posted on 5/9/20 at 10:16 am to the LSUSaint
quote:
You can’t bring a shotgun to a fist fight and then claim self defense because the other guy grabbed it.
Yes you can
But you cannot be the obvious initial aggressor, fire a shot before the guy tried to take your gun, then claim self defense
2
Posted on 5/9/20 at 10:18 am to FAP SAM
Jesus. Did anyone read the letter? The DA clearly explains why he is refusing himself.
Posted on 5/9/20 at 10:19 am to FAP SAM
quote:
you shouldn't be giving your opinion on the case in order to make your friend look better
Maybe the more factual knowledge is what's doing that. You do not know.
Posted on 5/9/20 at 10:20 am to DeafJam73
quote:
MAYBE this guy really was up to no good ,
Based on what evidence? How would the two suspects even begin to know his motive?
Yet you do the same with the suspects.
quote:
Lets base opinions off of actual evidence instead of making conclusions like lebron james did instantly claiming all blacks are being hunted.
Get out with this shite.
Yes, Lebron is full of it so we should get out with his shite.
Posted on 5/9/20 at 10:21 am to FAP SAM
quote:
But you cannot be the obvious initial aggressor, fire a shot before the guy tried to take your gun, then claim self defense
Read the letter at the link. Their analysis shows that Aubrey crosses from the right side of the truck to the left, advances on the guy with the shotgun and grabs it. A shot is fired only after he has his hands on the shotgun. That is a justifiable shooting per the law.
Now I have only watched the video on a phone screen and can’t say all of that is accurate. But that is what the DA is saying.
Posted on 5/9/20 at 10:23 am to DeafJam73
quote:
Based on what evidence? How would the two suspects even begin to know his motive?
Not defending the guys, but because of his record of stealing.
Doesn't give you the right to kill him because you saw him at a construction site.
Posted on 5/9/20 at 10:23 am to Geauxboy
quote:
Yet you do the same with the suspects.
Because even if the jogger had committed a crime, the two guys in the truck are not inherently in the right. Was he an imminent threat to anyone at that time? Was he actively in the process if committing a crime? Maybe, maybe not. So, yeah. I’m questioning them hard because they’re not the one’s who are dead. Their actions caused the death of someone else.
Posted on 5/9/20 at 10:23 am to jbgleason
quote:
Read the letter at the link. Their analysis shows that Aubrey crosses from the right side of the truck to the left, advances on the guy with the shotgun and grabs it. A shot is fired only after he has his hands on the shotgun. That is a justifiable shooting per the law.
The point is this DA is biased and had to recuse herself. The police wanted to arrest these dudes and she told them not to. Any statement she makes should be viewed as a biased report that is attempting to clear her friend
Posted on 5/9/20 at 10:25 am to jbgleason
quote:
Did anyone read the letter? The DA clearly explains why he is refusing himself.
Sigh...
So, you are literally going to ignore the myriad of evidence and latch on to this one line.
Why?
Posted on 5/9/20 at 10:26 am to dgnx6
quote:
because of his record of stealing.
They knew that?
Posted on 5/9/20 at 10:26 am to Inspector85
“I have a conflict of interest and therefore can’t be objective or fair. Now let me tell you why they shouldn’t be arrested.”
You see the problem?
You see the problem?
Posted on 5/9/20 at 10:27 am to the LSUSaint
quote:
Yes you can
You can but you can’t instigate the fist fight. Off of your property while trying some half assed blockade.
You could have video of that guy rummaging through construction sites and those 2 would still be in the wrong for executing a burglar who didn’t even steal anything. Call 911. Get behind the dude and follow til the Po Po show up.
Posted on 5/9/20 at 10:28 am to jbgleason
quote:
Read the letter at the link. Their analysis shows that Aubrey crosses from the right side of the truck to the left, advances on the guy with the shotgun and grabs it. A shot is fired only after he has his hands on the shotgun. That is a justifiable shooting per the law.
It’s not that cut and dry. You can also argue he attacked because he felt threatened by a guy with a gun. Which holds more water than a guy with a gun being threatened by a jogger. The life of the guy in the truck was not in imminent danger. If it was, it’s only because he put himself there. He instigated.
Posted on 5/9/20 at 10:29 am to jbgleason
quote:
Read the letter at the link. Their analysis shows that Aubrey crosses from the right side of the truck to the left, advances on the guy with the shotgun and grabs it. A shot is fired only after he has his hands on the shotgun. That is a justifiable shooting per the law.
He’s saying the “initial aggressor” is the father/son by chasing him with a truck and their firearms and attempting to corner him.
Posted on 5/9/20 at 10:29 am to dgnx6
quote:
Not defending the guys, but because of his record of stealing
They had no way of knowing his record.
Posted on 5/9/20 at 10:29 am to jbgleason
quote:
Jesus. Did anyone read the letter? The DA clearly explains why he is refusing himself.
If you recuse, you shouldn’t offer an opinion. If you can reasonably and fairly offer an opinion, you shouldn’t recuse.
If you recuse AND offer an opinion, you are full of shite and I don’t give much weight to what you say.
Posted on 5/9/20 at 10:29 am to jbgleason
Cant really tell in the video when the first shot is fired when I watched it. neither of them were in the cameras view. But that's what this DA is saying so prepare for riots
Posted on 5/9/20 at 10:31 am to FAP SAM
quote:
But you cannot be the obvious initial aggressor, fire a shot before the guy tried to take your gun, then claim self defense
If I bring a gun to a fistfight, I can absolutely use the gun IF at some point if I feel my life is in danger.
I'm responding to that..not you and others changing the situation.
Grave danger....I assume risk when fist fighting..but if the guy stomps on my head, I can pull out a pistol and defend myself against dying.
Works both ways with hypotheticals
This post was edited on 5/9/20 at 10:37 am
Posted on 5/9/20 at 10:32 am to Nado Jenkins83
It’s really all irrelevant. If the two guys in the truck can’t prove that they saw him commit a crime or prove he was an immediate threat to the community, they are fricked.
Page 2 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News