- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Favorite older commercials
Posted on 5/11/23 at 8:26 am to RogerTheShrubber
Posted on 5/11/23 at 8:26 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
This idiot believes men pretending to be sexualized 12 year old girls is something they're born with.
He also thinks the exponential rate of trannyism is because all of those poor people were suffering in silence.
You would be dead wrong my friend but of course you know that...you are simply signaling your virtue to like-minded folks for their approval.
quote:
You cannot reason with people this stupid. He's made up his mind because its attractive to him.
I fully understand to be narrow minded and bigoted you either have to be too stupid to use a dictionary or too obtuse. I also fully understand the definition of gender as opposed to the definition of sex and biology. You are 100% correct that my mind is made up and nothing will change it...I have made up my mind to accept that words have accepted definitions and are therefore used appropriately whether they fit my world view or not.
2
Posted on 5/11/23 at 8:56 am to LSU6262
Posted on 5/11/23 at 9:02 am to AwgustaDawg
quote:
It is amazing that just 27 years ago that was done and no one went out and bought beer, set up a camera, got their gun and blasted the beer and posted them doing so publicly to virtue signal their disgust...
Why do you want to show your penis to kids?
Posted on 5/11/23 at 9:16 am to LSU6262
Posted on 5/11/23 at 9:26 am to AwgustaDawg
No, I mean growing up in the NOLA area, they stayed in the green area of the French Quarter. You probably know the area very well
Posted on 5/11/23 at 9:27 am to LSU6262
I use to really enjoy the Girls Gone Wild commercials as a boy...
Posted on 5/11/23 at 9:29 am to AwgustaDawg
quote:
I fully understand to be narrow minded and bigoted you either have to be too stupid to use a dictionary or too obtuse. I also fully understand the definition of gender as opposed to the definition of sex and biology. You are 100% correct that my mind is made up and nothing will change it...I have made up my mind to accept that words have accepted definitions and are therefore used appropriately whether they fit my world view or not.
Define the word "woman".
Posted on 5/11/23 at 9:42 am to LittleJerrySeinfield
That's thinking with your dipstick, Jimmy!
Posted on 5/11/23 at 10:19 am to LittleJerrySeinfield
quote:
Define the word "woman".
In what context and in what era? The word is not a reference to gender...it is derived based on biology. The 2 are not synonymous despite the trend of the last 70 or so years to use them as such...for about 1500 years they were never used synonymously and for about 70 they have been to some extent...
The word is almost as old as English itself...derived from "wif" (adult BIOLOGICAL female) and "man" (human being) combined it was originally wifman and meant an adult biological female human. Interesting enough "wer" meant adult biological male and combined with man became "werman" meaning an adult biological male human...but suspicoulsy close to the modern spelling and sound "woman"...but I digress. Neither wifman, woman, werman or man references gender in any manner because prior to about 1900 gender was a grammatical reference only and was never used in english in the way so many mistakenly use it today as an indicator of biological sex. Nouns in most languages, including old and middle english, were gender specific...English evolved and today nouns are no longer gender in nature for the most part. Gender as used today began in the late 1950s and 60s to describe cultural and social expectations based on biological sex...a biological male is expected to dress as a man, a biological woman is expected to dress as a woman. During the same period it these norms and expectations were becoming less and less prevalent...women could wear pants, men could be sexually attracted to a woman in pants. Sometime in the last 70 years or so gender became more widely used than sex in scholarly texts and social science, and the arts and humanities...this is where the current confusion stems....for about 70 years of mankinds millions of years we have read and heard gender and sex used interchangeably when for the vast majority the existence of english of any sort existing on earth they were not synonymous and are not considered synonymous today...yet they are often used that way and their meanings taught that way. Again, for about 70 years...prior to that it was unheard of. Gender refers to characteristics while sex refers to biology...therefore a man in a dress is still a biological man who is, while in the dress, wearing the clothing associated with the feminine gender.
As far as gender identity we all, every one of us, identify ourselves in terms of gender. Most of the time, say 99% of the time, that identicication coincides with our biological sex...we never thing about it and if we do societal and cultural expectations lead us to tamp those thoughts deep down and not allow them to be known...except in rare instances where someone says "wait a tic...what about my opinion? Does it not matter?" Of course it does...but we usually do not think about it.
Posted on 5/11/23 at 10:22 am to AwgustaDawg
quote:
I have made up my mind to accept that words have accepted definitions and are therefore used appropriately whether they fit my world view or not.
quote:
In what context and in what era? The word is not a reference to gender...it is derived based on biology. The 2 are not synonymous despite the trend of the last 70 or so years to use them as such...for about 1500 years they were never used synonymously and for about 70 they have been to some extent...
The word is almost as old as English itself...derived from "wif" (adult BIOLOGICAL female) and "man" (human being) combined it was originally wifman and meant an adult biological female human. Interesting enough "wer" meant adult biological male and combined with man became "werman" meaning an adult biological male human...but suspicoulsy close to the modern spelling and sound "woman"...but I digress. Neither wifman, woman, werman or man references gender in any manner because prior to about 1900 gender was a grammatical reference only and was never used in english in the way so many mistakenly use it today as an indicator of biological sex. Nouns in most languages, including old and middle english, were gender specific...English evolved and today nouns are no longer gender in nature for the most part. Gender as used today began in the late 1950s and 60s to describe cultural and social expectations based on biological sex...a biological male is expected to dress as a man, a biological woman is expected to dress as a woman. During the same period it these norms and expectations were becoming less and less prevalent...women could wear pants, men could be sexually attracted to a woman in pants. Sometime in the last 70 years or so gender became more widely used than sex in scholarly texts and social science, and the arts and humanities...this is where the current confusion stems....for about 70 years of mankinds millions of years we have read and heard gender and sex used interchangeably when for the vast majority the existence of english of any sort existing on earth they were not synonymous and are not considered synonymous today...yet they are often used that way and their meanings taught that way. Again, for about 70 years...prior to that it was unheard of. Gender refers to characteristics while sex refers to biology...therefore a man in a dress is still a biological man who is, while in the dress, wearing the clothing associated with the feminine gender.
As far as gender identity we all, every one of us, identify ourselves in terms of gender. Most of the time, say 99% of the time, that identicication coincides with our biological sex...we never thing about it and if we do societal and cultural expectations lead us to tamp those thoughts deep down and not allow them to be known...except in rare instances where someone says "wait a tic...what about my opinion? Does it not matter?" Of course it does...but we usually do not think about it.
It's really quite simple. Define woman.
Posted on 5/11/23 at 10:24 am to LSU6262
I have a ton of them.
Snake the drug dealer
Oxy's Residont
Dunkin Donuts Moving Commerical
80s Whitney Bank Commercial
And the mother of all commercials:
Franky and Johnny See the Special Man
Snake the drug dealer
Oxy's Residont
Dunkin Donuts Moving Commerical
80s Whitney Bank Commercial
And the mother of all commercials:
Franky and Johnny See the Special Man
Posted on 5/11/23 at 10:28 am to LittleJerrySeinfield
quote:
It's really quite simple. Define woman.
I just did my friend. If you're incapable or unwilling to read it that is your choice.
But I will play your stupid game. Define Gender. I did your bidding, are you willing to do the same? Of course not....youre are too invested, too stupid or too obtuse.
Posted on 5/11/23 at 10:31 am to boxcarbarney
Posted on 5/11/23 at 10:32 am to AwgustaDawg
quote:
I just did my friend. If you're incapable or unwilling to read it that is your choice.
Why did it take you 500 words when 3 would suffice: adult human female.
Posted on 5/11/23 at 10:33 am to HoustonGumbeauxGuy
JFC that is fantastic. 
Posted on 5/11/23 at 10:33 am to AwgustaDawg
quote:
AwgustaDawg
Please go away. You've taken what could have been a fun thread (something that has been missing from the OT lately) and shite all over it.
Posted on 5/11/23 at 10:35 am to LSU6262
AND TWIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIINS
Posted on 5/11/23 at 10:38 am to LittleJerrySeinfield
quote:
Why did it take you 500 words when 3 would suffice: adult human female.
Because that is not the definition of any meaningful english language dictionary at any time in the history of the english language. The definition in any that is considered refferable in scholarly texts is, as I wrote " adult biological female human". Your leaving out the biological part indicates that you understand full well that gender and biology are, at best, loosely connected with the latter being based on observable and identifiable scientific data and the former being based on societal and cultural norms...
Posted on 5/11/23 at 10:41 am to AwgustaDawg
quote:
But I will play your stupid game. Define Gender. I did your bidding, are you willing to do the same? Of course not....youre are too invested, too stupid or too obtuse
1. A grammatical category, often designated as male, female, or neuter, used in the classification of nouns, pronouns, adjectives, and, in some languages, verbs that may be arbitrary or based on characteristics such as sex or animacy and that determines agreement with or selection of modifiers, referents, or grammatical forms
2. Either of the two divisions, designated female and male, by which most organisms are classified on the basis of their reproductive organs and functions; sex.
Posted on 5/11/23 at 10:43 am to AwgustaDawg
Because back then, it was a joke. The absurdity of such a thing was laughed at. But here we are facing what used to be paradoxical has come to fruition. Who’s laughing now. But what’s sad is that you’re ok with it. Enjoy your bud, bud.
Page 3 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News